English Instruction Using the KWULMSP Technique to Enhance Reading Comprehension Ability
Keywords:
Reading Skill, KWULMSP Technique, KWL Plus TechniqueAbstract
This article aims to synthesize the concepts of KWL Plus with vocabulary and speaking skills to enhance reading comprehension abilities of students. It is proposed that KWULMSP technique is divided into seven components: K (What Do You Know?), W (What Do You Want to Know?), U (Unknown Words), L (What Did You Learn?), M (Mapping), S (Summary) and P (Presentation). This technique could enhance the ability of the students to identify the main ideas and details, practice answering questions, and develop critical thinking skills.
References
Ausubel, D. P. (1960) “The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. ”Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(5), 267-272.
Anderson, R. C. (1977). “The Nation of Schemata and the Educational Enterprise,” Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Hillsdate, New Jesey : Lawrence ErlbaumCarr.
Anuyahong, Bundit. (2557). Development of an English Reading Instructional Model Based on Japanese Culture through Computer-Assisted Language Learning for First Year Students, Thai-Nichi Institute of Technology. Doctor of Philosophy Program in Department of Curriculum and Instruction. Silpakorn University.
Bean, T. W. and Steenwyk, F. L. (1984). The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth graders’ summary writing and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16.
Brown, Douglas H. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to language Pedagogy. 2nd ed. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Carr E. and Ogle, D. (1987). “KWL Plus: a strategy for comprehension and summarization.” Journal of Reading, 30, 626-631.
Changniam, Namphueng. (2559). The Effects of Reading English Instruction by KWL plus Technique on Reading Comprehension Ability of Lower Vocational Certificate one Students. Master Degree in Education Degree in Curriculum and Learning Management Program, Graduate School, Nakhon Sawan Rajabhat University.
Conner, Jenifer. (2004). KWL Plus. [online], Available from: http;//www.users. Edle, Utwente/lanzing/em home.html.
Cooter, R. B and Flynt, E. S. (1996). Teaching Reading in the Content Areas. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Davis and Winek. (1989). “Story map instruction: A road map for reading comprehension.” The Reading Teacher, 43 (3).
Hamdan, M. H. (2014). “KWL-Plus Effectiveness on Improving Reading Comprehension of Tenth Graders of Jordanian Male Students.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4 (11), 2278-2288.
Jittreenit, Neerawan. (2552).The effectiveness of the English day camp to promote communicative speaking skill for extra activity group of upper elementary school students Master of Arts Degree in Teaching English as a Foreign Language, Srinakharinwirot University.
Laowreandee, Watchara. (2552). Model and strategies in learning for thinking development: Nakhonprathum: Silpakorn University.
Laufer, B. and Shmueli, K. (1997). “Memorizing new words: does Teaching have anything to do with it?” RELC Journal, 28 (1), 89.
Ogle, D. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading teacher, 39, 564-570.
Reid, J., Forrestal, P. and Cook, J. (1989). Small group learning in the classroom. Portsmouth, HN: Heinemann.
SaengNapawan, Banjung. (2556). “Development Reading Critical Thinking for Prathom six by applying KWL Plus.” Master Degree in Curriculum and Instruction. Graduate School, Silpakorn University.
Suparp, Somsong. (2557). Development of English Reading Modules Focusing on Scaffolding Techniques in Learning to Enhance Reading Ability for EST, Faculty of Engineering Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakorn. Doctorate Degree in Curriculum and Instruction. Graduate School, Silpakorn University.
Szabo, Susan. (2006). “KWHHL: A Student-Driven Evolution of the KWL.” American Secondary Education, 34 (3), 57-67.
Williams, Eddie. (1994). Reading in the language Classroom. 8th ed. London: Macmillan Publisher Ltd.
Wiwatnanoon, Siwat. (2550). Analyzing and writing reading. Bangkok: Xexenonlising.
Anderson, R. C. (1977). “The Nation of Schemata and the Educational Enterprise,” Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Hillsdate, New Jesey : Lawrence ErlbaumCarr.
Anuyahong, Bundit. (2557). Development of an English Reading Instructional Model Based on Japanese Culture through Computer-Assisted Language Learning for First Year Students, Thai-Nichi Institute of Technology. Doctor of Philosophy Program in Department of Curriculum and Instruction. Silpakorn University.
Bean, T. W. and Steenwyk, F. L. (1984). The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth graders’ summary writing and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16.
Brown, Douglas H. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to language Pedagogy. 2nd ed. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Carr E. and Ogle, D. (1987). “KWL Plus: a strategy for comprehension and summarization.” Journal of Reading, 30, 626-631.
Changniam, Namphueng. (2559). The Effects of Reading English Instruction by KWL plus Technique on Reading Comprehension Ability of Lower Vocational Certificate one Students. Master Degree in Education Degree in Curriculum and Learning Management Program, Graduate School, Nakhon Sawan Rajabhat University.
Conner, Jenifer. (2004). KWL Plus. [online], Available from: http;//www.users. Edle, Utwente/lanzing/em home.html.
Cooter, R. B and Flynt, E. S. (1996). Teaching Reading in the Content Areas. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Davis and Winek. (1989). “Story map instruction: A road map for reading comprehension.” The Reading Teacher, 43 (3).
Hamdan, M. H. (2014). “KWL-Plus Effectiveness on Improving Reading Comprehension of Tenth Graders of Jordanian Male Students.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4 (11), 2278-2288.
Jittreenit, Neerawan. (2552).The effectiveness of the English day camp to promote communicative speaking skill for extra activity group of upper elementary school students Master of Arts Degree in Teaching English as a Foreign Language, Srinakharinwirot University.
Laowreandee, Watchara. (2552). Model and strategies in learning for thinking development: Nakhonprathum: Silpakorn University.
Laufer, B. and Shmueli, K. (1997). “Memorizing new words: does Teaching have anything to do with it?” RELC Journal, 28 (1), 89.
Ogle, D. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading teacher, 39, 564-570.
Reid, J., Forrestal, P. and Cook, J. (1989). Small group learning in the classroom. Portsmouth, HN: Heinemann.
SaengNapawan, Banjung. (2556). “Development Reading Critical Thinking for Prathom six by applying KWL Plus.” Master Degree in Curriculum and Instruction. Graduate School, Silpakorn University.
Suparp, Somsong. (2557). Development of English Reading Modules Focusing on Scaffolding Techniques in Learning to Enhance Reading Ability for EST, Faculty of Engineering Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakorn. Doctorate Degree in Curriculum and Instruction. Graduate School, Silpakorn University.
Szabo, Susan. (2006). “KWHHL: A Student-Driven Evolution of the KWL.” American Secondary Education, 34 (3), 57-67.
Williams, Eddie. (1994). Reading in the language Classroom. 8th ed. London: Macmillan Publisher Ltd.
Wiwatnanoon, Siwat. (2550). Analyzing and writing reading. Bangkok: Xexenonlising.
Downloads
Published
2019-10-15
How to Cite
สุภาพ ส. (2019). English Instruction Using the KWULMSP Technique to Enhance Reading Comprehension Ability. KASEM BUNDIT JOURNAL, 20(October), 157–166. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jkbu/article/view/219124
Issue
Section
Research articles
License
ทัศนคติ ความคิดเห็นใด ๆ ที่ปรากฏในวารสารเกษมบัณฑิตฉบับนี้เป็นของผู้เขียน โดยเฉพาะ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษมบัณฑิตและบรรณาธิการ ไม่จำเป็นต้องมีความเห็นพ้องด้วย
