Kasem Bundit University : Pursuing transparency and collective anti-corruption efforts
Keywords:
Anti-corruption, STRONG Model, higher education institutions, good governanceAbstract
PURPOSES: To promote and instill integrity, enhance knowledge and skills, and establish collaborative networks for preventing and combating corruption based on the STRONG Model among students, faculty, and staff to foster transparency and sustainability. METHODS: A quantitative approach to evaluate the project “Kasem Bundit University: Pursuing trans parency and collective anti-corruption efforts. The project consisted of five components, namely Digital Anti-Corruption Challenge, STRONG Innovation Workshop, STRONG: Sufficient Mind Against Corruption course, STRONG Student Leaders Network, and Future University Anti-Corruption Forum. The target group totaled 510 participants. Questionnaires were used for data collection. Data from pre- and post-tests and satisfaction surveys were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired-samples t-test. RESULTS: A total of 519 participants were involved in the project. Knowledge of anti-corruption significantly increased, with 80–100% passing the criteria. Overall satisfaction was high to very high. Tangible outcomes included 29 infographic media, 12 prototype innovations, one anti-corruption course, and one student leader network. THEORETICAL/POLICY IMPLICATIONS: The STRONG Model was effective in promoting anti-corruption awareness, supporting governance and behavioral learning theories. Participatory learning, digital innovation, and leadership networks are recommended for strengthening the national anti-corruption strategy.
References
Artyukhova, N., Churikanova, O., & Bliumska-Danko, K. (2024). University leadership: Transparency in communication with external stakeholders. Business Ethics and Leadership, 8(4), 16-36. https://doi.org/10.61093/bel.8(4).16-36.2024
Atanaw, B., Estifanos, A. B., & Negash, H. G. (2025). How university governance affects education service quality: Insights from Ethiopian Public Universities. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1447357. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1447357
Glendinning, I., Orim, S.-M., & King, A. (2019). Policies and actions of accreditation and quality assurance bodies to counter corruption in higher education. Coventry University, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED597948.pdf
Moghimi, S. M., Rahbar, F., Yazdani, H. R., & Moghadamfar, S. R. (2022). Introducing the organizational resilience against corruption as a new concept in the anti-corruption literature: Concept analysis. Organizational Behavior Studies Quarterly, 11(1), 175–206. https://obs.sinaweb.net/article_249710_en.html
Office of the National Anti-Corruption Commission. (2024). STRONG Anti-Corruption and Bribery Organization. https://multi.dopa.go.th/acoc/assets/modules/news/ uploads/287364ec67934439f43544d695b269ce6704b54c5fb006160014286552315311.pdf
Sutanto, A. T. (2024). Anti-corruption education as a prevention of criminal acts of corruption. Journal Terekam Jejak (JTJ), 2(2), 1-14. https://journal.terekamjejak.com/index.php/jtj/article/view/34
Thamsutiwat S., & Pornwiang S. (2024). Analyzing the Implementation of Anti-corruption Education Curriculum Guidelines in Basic Education Institutions in Thailand. ISSN: 2189-101X [Pater presentation] The Asian Conference on Education & International Development 2024 official Conference Proceedings (pp. 171-184) Japan, https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2189-101X.2024.15
UNDP. (1997). Governance for Sustainable Human Development. A UNDP policy document. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/492551?v=pdf
Wongthanavasu, S., Ruangthamsing, C., Ketchatturat, J. & Thamviset, W. (2022). An evaluation of the implementation of the anti-corruption education curriculum. Journal of Modern Learning Development, 7(3), 83-99. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jomld/article/view/253577
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 KASEM BUNDIT JOURNAL

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ทัศนคติ ความคิดเห็นใด ๆ ที่ปรากฏในวารสารเกษมบัณฑิตฉบับนี้เป็นของผู้เขียน โดยเฉพาะ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษมบัณฑิตและบรรณาธิการ ไม่จำเป็นต้องมีความเห็นพ้องด้วย
