The Effects of Organizational Culture and Administrative Capability on the Personal Management Efficiency in the Competitive circumstance in the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC)

Abstract

This research studied the effects of organizational culture and administrative capability on the personal management efficiency in the competitive circumstance in the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC). The objective of this research was to investigate two aspects, which firstly was to examine the correlation between the organizational culture and its effects over the personal management efficiency in the competitive circumstance of AEC and, secondly was to study the correlation between administrative capability and its effects on the personal management efficiency in the competitive circumstance of AEC. The research populations were the commercial registration companies in Hat Yai district and Mueang Songkhla district, Songkhla province. The closed-ended questionnaires were distributed to 100 samples with specific sampling to a person who works in those companies. The data were statistically analysed to determine mean, standard deviation, frequency, percentage, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple regression analysis. The findings of this research are as follows.  Firstly, the organizational culture was positively correlated to the personal management efficiency. Similarly, 15 independent variables of the organization culture were respectively correlated to the four variables of personal management efficiency including the selection and recruitment variables (R = 0.671), relationship and compensation variables (R = 0.602), training and development variables (R = 0.528), and performance appraisal variables           (R = 0.602) at the significant level of 0.05. Secondly, the administrative capability was positively correlated to the personal management efficiency. Likewise, four independent variables of the administrative capability were correlated to the selection and recruitment variables (R = 0.615), relationship and compensation variables (R = 0.520), training and development variables (R = 0.456), and performance appraisal variables (R = 0.515), respectively at the significant level of 0.05.