Sustainability Disclosure and Tax Planning: A Case of Listed Companies in Thailand Sustainability Investment Index
Keywords:
Environmental, Social and Governance, ESG, Sustainability Disclosure, Tax Planning, Thailand Sustainability Investment Index, SETTHSI, SETESGAbstract
The main objectives of this study were to explore the levels of sustainability disclosure and to examine the relationships between the levels of sustainability disclosure and tax planning of listed companies in the SET Thailand Sustainability (THIS) Investment Index, named SETTHSI index or SETESG index. The sample comprised 116 observations from listed companies in the index during 2020 - 2021. Sustainability disclosure data were measured using a questionnaire adapted from the Sustainability Reporting Guidelines of the Stock Exchange of Thailand and the Global Report Initiative. Also, tax planning data were measured by three measures: current effective tax rates, the ratio of tax expenses and total assets, and the ratio of tax expenses to cash flow from operating activities.
This study revealed that most listed companies in the Thailand Sustainability Investment Index had high levels of sustainability information disclosure and tended to increase sustainability information disclosure. The Resource Industry had the highest disclosure level at 0.693, but Technology Industry had the lowest sustainability disclosure level at 0.556. In addition, the governance dimension and the environment dimension were the highest and lowest disclosure levels at 0.660 and 0.596, respectively. Moreover, the results of this study provided empirical evidence that either sustainability disclosures as a whole or environmental, social, and governance dimensions were negatively correlated with tax planning. They pointed out that companies listed in Thailand Sustainability Investment Index that disclose high levels of environmental, social, and corporate governance information as a whole or by high dimensions tend to have low tax planning, demonstrating awareness of tax responsibility.
References
Chen, X. 2018. Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Political Connection and Tax Aggressiveness: Evidence from China’s Capital Markets. Open Journal of Business and Management. Vol. 6. 151 - 164.
Chongruksut, W. 2016. Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure in Thailand. Srinakharinwirot Research and Development: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 8. No. 15. 128 - 144.
Davis, A. K., Guenther, D. A., Krull, L. K. and Williams, B. M. 2016. Do Socially Responsible Firms pay more taxes?. The Accounting Review. Vol. 91. No. 1. 47 - 68.
Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C. 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics. Vol. 26. 301 - 308.
Lanis, R. and Richardson, G. 2012. Corporate Social Responsibility and Tax Aggressiveness: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Account & Public Policy. Vol. 31. No. 1. 86 - 108.
Mahadeo, J. D., Oogarah-Hanuman, V. and Soobaroyen, T. 2011. A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Social Disclosures in a Developing Economy. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 104. No. 4. 545 - 558.
Melo, L. Q., Moraes, G. S. C., Souza, R. M. and Nascimento, E. M. 2020. Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Tax Aggressiveness of Firms? Evidences of the Brazilian Stock Market. Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil. Vol. 19. 1 - 19.
Mohanadas, N. D., Abdullah Salim, A.S. and Pheng, L.K. 2019. CSR and Tax Aggressiveness of Malaysian Listed Companies: Evidence from an emerging economy. Social Responsibility Journal. Vol. 16. No. 5. 597 - 612.
Nadiah, H., Wan, K., Mastora, Y., Rohayu, Y. and Rozainun, A. 2017. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure and Its Impacts towards Corporate Tax Aggressiveness. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences. Vol. 7. No. 5. 10 - 15.
Na Phuttalung, W. 2021. The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Tax Planning of Listed Companies in Resources Industry Group on The Stock Exchange of Thailand. Master of Accountancy Independent Study. Kasetsart university.
Preuss, A. and Preuss, B. 2017. Corporate Tax Payments and Corporate Social Responsibility: Complements or Substitutes? Empirical Evidence from Europe. Business and Economics Journal. Vol. 8. No. 4. 1 - 8.
Sari, D. and Tjen, C. 2016. Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Environmental Performance and Tax aggressiveness. Business International Research Journal of business studies. Vol. 9. No. 2. 93 - 104.
Stock Exchange of Thailand a. 2022. Sustainability Reporting Guide. Retrieved September 5, 2022 from https://www.setsustainability.com/download/nqcywd36j9tmk5x
Stock Exchange of Thailand b. 2022. SETTHSI Index Series. Retrieved September 23, 2022 from https://www.set.or.th/market/ information/securities-list/constituents-list-SETTHSI
Thaipat Institute. 2017. Are CSR and ESG different? Retrieved August 21, 2022 from https://www.thaicsr.com/2017/06/csr-esg.html
Thanjunpong, S. 2014. The Impact of Corporate Governance on Tax Planning: Stock Exchange of Thailand. Journal of Accounting Profession. Vol. 10. No. 28. 5 - 18.
Thanjunpong, S. and Bangmak, R. 2017. The Influence of Board of Directors, Audit Committee
and Ownership Structure on Tax Planning: An Empirical Evidence of Thailand. Journal of Accounting Profession. Vol 13. No. 37. 29 - 44.
Thanjunpong, S., Chaiwong, D. and Dechsiri, P. 2018. The Association between Sustainable Development Report Disclosures and Tax Planning of Listed Companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. MFU Connexion: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 7. No. 2. 273 - 295.
Wallace, R. S. O. 1988. International and International Consensus on the Importance of Disclosure Item in Financial Reports: A Nigerian Case Study. The British Accounting Review. Vol. 20. No. 3. 223 – 265.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ข้อความ ข้อคิดเห็น ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ แผนภูมิ แผนผัง เป็นต้น ที่ปรากฏและแสดงในบทความต่างๆ ในวารสารบริหารธุรกิจเทคโนโลยีมหานคร ถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบโดยตรงของผู้เขียนบทความนั้นๆ มิใช่เป็นความรับผิดชอบใดๆ ของวารสารบริหารธุรกิจเทคโนโลยีมหานคร และมหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีมหานคร
บทความที่ตีพิมพ์ในวารสารบริหารธุรกิจเทคโนโลยีมหานคร ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์เฉพาะของคณะบริหารธุรกิจ มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีมหานคร หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำทั้งหมดหรือส่วนใดส่วนหนึ่งไปเผยแพร่ต่อหรือเพื่อกระทำการใดๆ จะต้องได้รับการอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรจากคณะบริหารธุรกิจ มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีมหานครก่อนเท่านั้น