Sustainable waste Management of Naku Subdistrict Administration Organization Nakae District Nakhon Phanom Province

Abstract

The objectives of this research were (1) to study the Public opinion on sustainable waste management of Naku subdistrict Administration Organization Nakae District Nakhon Phanom Province. (2) to comparison the public opinion on sustainable waste management of Naku subdistrict Administration Organization Nakae District Nakhon Phanom Province. The samples used in this study were 361 and the value of reliability were 0.91. The research collected the data by using the questionnaire. The statistics used for analyzing data were frequency, percentage, means, and standard deviation. Hypothesis tested by t-test and F-test and if differences were found, the differences in pair were later analyzed by LSD method at the statistical significance level of .05

            The results of this research were as follows:

1. The public opinion on sustainable waste management of Naku subdistrict Administration Organization Nakae District Nakhon Phanom Province found that in overall and in each aspect at a moderate level ( = 3.06) ranking in the order of mean from high to low as follows: Consciousness with waste management aspect (  = 3.12) Participation on waste management aspect (  = 3.11) Development of storage aspect (  = 3.07) Community learning and prototype aspect (  = 3.04) Laws and guidelines aspect (  = 3.02) and Potential of Naku subdistrict Administration (  = 2.97)
2. The comparisons of the public opinion on sustainable waste management of Naku subdistrict Administration Organization Nakae District Nakhon Phanom Province classified by sex, age, occupation, education levels and income found that population were different in sex found that public opinions on sustainable waste management of Naku subdistrict Administration Organization Nakae District Nakhon Phanom Province in overall and in each aspect at a different, but population who were different in age, occupation, education levels and income were not different by the statistical significance at .05 level.