Visible Death: The Hasdiling as Semiotic Technology in Lanna Funerary Ritual

Main Article Content

Yathaweemintr Peuchthonglang
Prateep Peuchthonglanglang

Abstract

A giant bird with an elephant's trunk, rising above rooftops in a cremation ground — the Hasdiling does not merely appear in Lanna funerary practice. It works. This article pursues the question of how it works, rather than what it means, tracing the object's function as a semiotic technology that engineers the perceptual conditions under which communities can witness death without being undone by it. Drawing on secondary interpretive ethnographic analysis of longitudinal fieldwork conducted across seven Northern Thai provinces (2016–2020), the study re-reads an existing body of richly documented ethnographic material through the intersecting lenses of religious semiotics, material religion studies, and phenomenological theories of spatial perception.


The argument is not that earlier scholarship misread Hasdiling, but that it asked of the object a different kind of question — one concerned with symbolic meaning rather than social mechanism. The findings demonstrate that the Hasdiling operates through the convergence of three structuring dimensions: the horizon as a perceptual infrastructure that frames death as passage rather than termination; vertical sociality as a spatial grammar through which moral hierarchy is made visible and physically felt; and ritual temporality anchored to the post-Lent season, which positions death within a communal rhythm of readiness and renewal. None of these dimensions work alone. Their convergence is what transforms the cremation ground into a managed moral event.


The article proposes the concept of Ritual Visibility of Death — the argument that funerary practice does not conceal death but carefully engineers the conditions under which it can appear in public: with order, with dignity, and without destroying those who witness it. This concept is developed through two complementary theoretical propositions: vertical sociality in religious materiality, which accounts for how height and spatial arrangement render moral hierarchy perceptible to the senses; and horizon as religious-social infrastructure, which explains how death comes to be experienced as movement rather than ending. Brought into dialogue with Philippe Ariès, Birgit Meyer, Webb Keane, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty, the Lanna case demonstrates how locally grounded ethnography can generate transferable theoretical insight — and why the question of how societies make death visible remains an undertheorized problem in the sociology of religion.

Article Details

How to Cite
Peuchthonglang, Y., & Peuchthonglanglang, P. (2026). Visible Death: The Hasdiling as Semiotic Technology in Lanna Funerary Ritual. Journal of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University, 38(1), 61–85. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jss/article/view/285874
Section
Academic Articles
Author Biography

Prateep Peuchthonglanglang, 1Department of Social Sciences and Humanities Faculty of Business Administration and Liberal Arts, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna

B.A. (Psychology), M.A. (Educational Psychology and Guidance), Ph.D. (Buddhist Studies)

References

ประทีป พืชทองหลาง, บุญรัตน์ ณ วิชัย, และญาตาวีมินทร์ พืชทองหลาง. 2563. ปราสาทศพนกหัสดีลิงค์ในล้านนา. ได้รับทุนสนับสนุนจากสำนักงานการวิจัยแห่งชาติ (วช.). (รายงานการวิจัยฉบับสมบูรณ์).

Adam, Barbara. 1990. Time and social theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Ariès, Philippe. 1981. The hour of our death, translated by Helen Weaver. New York: Knopf.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The forms of capital.” In Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, edited by John. G. Richardson. 241–258. Connecticut: Greenwood Press.

__________. 1991. Language and symbolic power, translated by Gino Raymond and. Matthew Adamson. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Davis, Richard. 1984. Muang metaphysics: A study of Northern Thai myth and ritual. Bangkok: Pandora Press.

Denzin, Norman K, and Yvonna S. Lincoln. Eds. 2011. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). California: SAGE.

Douglas, Mary. 1966. Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Durkheim, Émile. 1995. The elementary forms of religious life, translated by Karen E. Fields. New York: Free Press.

Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison, translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Pantheon Books.

__________. 1988. “Technologies of the self.” In Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault, edited by Luther H. Martin, Huck Gutman, and Patrick H. Hutton. 16–49. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Press.

Geertz, Clifford. 1973. “Religion as a cultural system.” In The interpretation of cultures, 87–125. New York: Basic Books.

Heaton, Janet. 2008. “Secondary analysis of qualitative data: An overview.” Historical Social Research 33(3): 33–45.

Hertz, Robert. 1960. Death and the right hand, translated by Claudia Needham, and Rodney Needham. London: Cohen & West.

Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy, translated by David Carr. Illinois: Northwestern University Press.

Ingold, Tim. 2013. Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. London: Routledge.

Keane, Webb. 2003. “Semiotics and the social analysis of material things.” Language & Communication 23(3–4): 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00003-7.

Ladwig, Patrice. 2012. “Visitors from hell: Transformative hospitality to ghosts in a Lao Buddhist festival.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18(S1): S90–S102.

Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The production of space, translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lincoln, Yvonna S, and Egon G. Guba 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. California: SAGE.

McDaniel, Justin. 2011. The lovelorn ghost and the magical monk: Practicing Buddhism in modern Thailand. New York: Columbia University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2012. Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Donald A. Landes. London: Routledge.

Metcalf, Peter, and Richard Huntington. 1991. Celebrations of death: The anthropology of mortuary ritual. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Meyer, Birgit. 2011. “Mediation and the genesis of presence: Toward a material approach to religion.” Material Religion 7(1): 23–39.

Morgan, David. 2010. Religion and material culture: The matter of belief. London: Routledge.

Obeyesekere, Gananath. 2002. Imagining karma: Ethical transformation in Amerindian, Buddhist, and Greek rebirth. California: University of California Press.

Peuchthonglang, Prateep, Yathaweemintr Peuchthonglang, and Boonrat Na Wichai. 2025. “The Style of Hasdiling Funeral Castles and the Funeral Ceremony of Monks in Northern Thailand.” Asian Journal of Arts and Culture 26(2): e43. https://doi.org/10.48048/ajac.2026.43.

Riessman, Catherine Kohler. 2008. Narrative methods for the human sciences. California: SAGE.

Swearer, Donald K. 2010. The Buddhist world of Southeast Asia. 2nd ed. New York: State University of New York Press.

Tambiah, Stanley Jeyaraja. 1970. Buddhism and the spirit cults in north-east Thailand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tanabe, Shigeharu, Ed. 2008. Imagining communities in Thailand: Ethnographic approaches. Chiang Mai: Mekong Press.

Thorne, Sally. 1994. “Secondary analysis in qualitative research.” Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship 26(3): 179–183.

Turner, Victor. 1969. The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine.

Van Gennep, Arnold. 1960. The rites of passage, translated by Monika B. Vizedom, Gabrielle L. Caffee. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.