Para-rubber Farmer’s Household Livelihoods under Para-rubber and Economic Animal Production System in Three Southern Border Provinces

Main Article Content

Buncha Somboonsuke
Purawich Phitthayaphinant

Abstract

This research aimed to study a para-rubber and economic animal production system, and livelihoods of para-rubber farmer households in three southern border provinces, i.e., Yala, Narathiwat, and Pattani provinces. The samples were 57 para-rubber farmers having the para-rubber and economic animal production system. Descriptive statistics and manifest content analysis were employed to analyze the data. The findings revealed the main objective of the production system was to be as the main occupation of the households. The important economic animals were cattle, chicken, and goat. The trend most affecting the para-rubber farmers’ household livelihoods was the change in natural resources and environment, especially soil degradation. Their household livelihood assets were overall at a low level. More than half of the para-rubber farmer households gained supports from the related government agencies. The key livelihood strategy of the para-rubber farmer households was modification of food consumption patterns. The para-rubber farmers’ household livelihood outcomes were overall at a low level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Somboonsuke, B., & Phitthayaphinant, P. . (2020). Para-rubber Farmer’s Household Livelihoods under Para-rubber and Economic Animal Production System in Three Southern Border Provinces. Journal of Social Sciences Naresuan University, 16(2), 189–228. https://doi.org/10.14456/jssnu.2020.14
Section
Research Paper

References

Chantarat, S., Attavanich, W., & Sa-ngimnet, B. (2018). Microscopic view of Thailand’s agriculture through the lens of farmer registration and census data. Retrieved September 14, 2020, from https://bit.ly/3jPyDpo [in Thai].

Charernjiratragul, S., Romyen, A., & Satsue, P. (2017). Development of rubber-based intercropping system in Southern Thailand: Problems and obstacles. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(2), 588–599. [in Thai].

Data and Social Indicator Development Office, Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2019). Human achievement index 2019. Retrieved May 27, 2020, from https://bit.ly/3mCm5Ds [in Thai].

Deep South Watch Database. (2020). Summary of incidents in Southern Thailand, August 2020. Retrieved September 10, 2020, from https://bit.ly/3eiffA5 [in Thai].

Department for International Development. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. London: Department for International Development.

Intraskul, S., Somboonsuke, B., Thongtrai, N., & Phitthayaphinant, P. (2018). Cost of para-rubber production and selling problems of para-rubber farmers in Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(3), 817–828. [in Thai].

Jun-iad, J., Nilvises, P., Keowarn, B., & Yotakhong, S. (2014). The extension for self reliance of para rubber farmers in 3 Southern border Provinces. Princess of Naradhiwas University Journal, 6(2), 146–155. [in Thai].

Junkaew, A. (2010). Livelihoods of rubber unsmoked sheet producing households and rubber latex producing households: a case study of Namorbun Sub-District, Chulaporn District, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province (master’s thesis). Songkhla: Prince of Sonkla University. [in Thai].

Jutaviriya, K., & Lapanun, P. (2014). Integrated agriculture: Livelihood strategies of Esan farmers under globalization. Journal of Mekong Societies, 10(3), 25–48. [in Thai].

Kaewtathip, W. (2017). The suffering of rubber farmers in three Southern border Provinces of Thailand. Khon Kaen Agriculture Journal, 45(4), 693–702. [in Thai].

Longpichai, O., Perret, S. R., & Shivakoti, G. P. (2012). Role of livelihood capital in shaping the farming strategies and outcomes of smallholder rubber producers in Southern Thailand. Outlook on Agriculture, 41(2), 117–124.

Longpichai, O., & Kongmanee, C. (2019). Rubber farmers’ risk perception in Southern Thailand. Parichart Journal Thaksin University, 32(2), 134–146. [in Thai].

Masae, A. (2015). Enhancing sustainable rural livelihood through community-based development. Journal of Social Development, 17(1), 89–110. [in Thai].

Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. (2016). The agricultural development plan under the twelfth national economic and social development plan (2017–2021). Bangkok: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. [in Thai].

Muangkaew, T., & Shivakoti, P. G. (2005). Effect of livelihood assets on rice productivity: a case study of rice based farming in Southern Thailand. Journal of the International Society for Southeast Asian Agricultural Sciences, 11(2), 63–83.

Mulha, S., Satun, T., Phuworakij, M., Tabsombat, P., & Chalermsuk, T. (2015). Strategies used by residents of agricultural households in Bankhamphai, Muang District, Kalasin Province to maintain their livelihoods. Prae-wa Kalasin Journal of Kalasin University, 2(1), 80–111. [in Thai].

Narongchai, W., & Chumnanmak, R. (2019). Livelihood capital of urban farmer households in Kranuan District, Khon Kaen Province. Journal of Liberal Arts Prince of Songkla University, 11(1), 179–203. [in Thai].

National Accounts Office, Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2020). Gross regional and provincial product chain volume measures 2018 edition. Retrieved September 10, 2020, from

https://bit.ly/389nuNI [in Thai].

National Statistical Office. (2020a). Head count index (expenditure) by region and Province: 2009–2018. Retrieved September 10, 2020, from http://statbbi.nso.go.th/staticreport/page/sector/th/08.aspx [in Thai].

National Statistical Office. (2020b). Average monthly income per household by region and Province: 2009–2019. Retrieved September 14, 2020, from http://statbbi.nso.go.th/staticreport/page/sector/th/08.aspx [in Thai].

National Statistical Office. (2020c). Average debt per household by purpose of borrowing and Province: 2009–2019. Retrieved September 14, 2020, from http://statbbi.nso.go.th/staticreport/page/sector/th/08.aspx [in Thai].

Office of Agricultural Economics. (2020). Agricultural statistics of Thailand 2019. Retrieved June 18, 2020, from https://bit.ly/2TGCKcK [in Thai].

Ongiem, A., & Vichitvejpaisal, P. (2018). Validation of the tests. Thai Journal of Anesthesiology, 44(1), 36–42. [in Thai].

Ongwuttiwat, S. (2019). Linguistics strategies for responding to admonish in Thai and native speakers’ motivational concerns. Humanity and Social Science Journal, Ubon Ratchthani University, 10(2), 234–252. [in Thai].

Palee, J., & Anantanathon, A. (2020). The security-approach for enhancing agriculturalist surviving in industrial area of Thailand. Journal of Local Governance and Innovation, 4(1), 199–216. [in Thai].

Pensuk, A., & Shresthra, R. P. (2008). Effect of paddy area conversion to rubber plantation on rural livelihoods: A case study of Phatthalung watershed, Southern Thailand. GMSARN International Journal, 2(4), 185–190.

Ratanon, N., & Masae, A. (2015). Community learning process in selecting livelihood strategy towards sustainability livelihoods: A case of Ban Jaidee. Journal of the Association of Researchers, 20(3), 157–170. [in Thai].

Saengloetuthai, J. (2017). Quality of research instrument. Journal of Research and Curriculum Development, 7(1), 1–15. [in Thai].

Satsue, P., & Phitthayaphinant, P. (2018). Factors related to change in quality of life of para-rubber farmers from low para-rubber prices problem in Srinakharin District, Phatthalung Province. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Mahasarakham University, 37(3), 71–84. [in Thai].

Somboonsuke, B., Dhammasaccakarn, W., Cherdchom, P., Longpichai, O., & Phitthayaphinant, P. (2015). Potential, capacity and development of hired labor in smallholding rubber production system: Lesson learned from traditional rubber area, Songkhla Province. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 36(1), 74–87. [in Thai].

Somboonsuke, B., & Kongmanee, C. (2018). Causes of problems in driving diversify production systems in rubber plantations: Roots of problems and alternatives of rubber farmers under declining rubber prices. Journal of Business Administration and Social Sciences Ramkhamhaeng University, 1(3), 1–16. [in Thai].

Sriboonruang, K. (2014). Livelihood strategies of Esan farmers in agri-food and agro-fuel business context. Walailak Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 51–93. [in Thai].

Suphajaroenkool, A., Parinyasutinun, U., Laeheem, K., & Somboonsuke, B. (2019). Rubber fund cooperatives: Livelihood strategy of rubber planters under the situation of rubber’s price fluctuation case study of Baan Wang Pa, Thung Tam Sao, Hat Yai, Songkhla. Humanities and Social Sciences Journal, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, 10(2), 248–258. [in Thai].

Tanangsnakool, C., & Sutthinarakorn, W. (2016). Solutions to a career stability of rubber plantation’s farmers. Kasetsart Educational Review, 31(1), 57–62. [in Thai].

Thongpan, S., & Nuengchamnong, N. (2019). “From paddy field to rubber plantation”: Change in livelihood and food security of farmer households in Mekong river area, Bueng Kan Province. Humanity and Social Science Journal, Ubon Ratchthani University, 10(1), 10–41. [in Thai].

Viswanathan, P. K. (2008). Emerging smallholder rubber farming systems in India and Thailand: A comparative economic analysis. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 5(2), 1–19.

th Coordination Operation Center, Internal Security Operations Command. (2020). Strategy for the development of southern border Provinces 2020–2022. Retrieved May 27, 2020, from https://bit.ly/35Y29nZ [in Thai].