Contentious Movement for the Right to the City by the Four Region Slums Network

Main Article Content

Boonlert Visetpricha

Abstract

This article presents the objectives, tactics, and movements of the Four Regions Slums Network for the long-term land rental contract from the State Railway of Thailand’s land (SRT). The movement has initiated since 1998 until the present [2021]. The researcher conducted the research by formally interviewing informants, who are community and the Four Regions Slum Network leaders, and Non-governmental Organizations’ staffs. The two concepts of the right to the city and the social movement were applied to investigate. The outcome showed that the aim of the movement, the claim for the right to rent the State Railway of Thailand’s land in the city, is according with the right to the city theory. This notion challenges mainstream urban development, which excludes the urban poor from the urban space. The main tactic of the movement was to mobilize its member to create a negotiation platform of power. The movement had succeeded both at the policy and community levels. As in the case study at Shong Lom–Lang Shang Community, instead of being removed from the city, the community was successfully obtained the 30-year land rental contract by the SRT. The movement reflected contentious politics, because it was driven by marginalized people who are frustrated by social inequality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Visetpricha บ. . (2021). Contentious Movement for the Right to the City by the Four Region Slums Network. Journal of Social Sciences Naresuan University, 17(2), 177–217. https://doi.org/10.14456/jssnu.2021.14
Section
Research Paper

References

Aalbers, M. B., & Gibb, K. (2014). Housing and the right to the city: Introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Housing Policy, 14(3), 207-213.

Bhan, G. (2009). “This is no longer the city I once knew”. Evictions, the urban poor and the right to the city in millennial Delhi. Environment and Urbanization, 21(1), 127-142.

Boonyabancha, S. (2009). Land for housing the poor-by the poor: Experiences from the Baan Mankong nationwide slum upgrading programme in Thailand. Environment and Urbanization, 21(2), 309-329.

Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., & Mayer, M. (Eds.). (2012). Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city. London and New York: Routledge.

Bunyarit, C. (2017). Bicycle route development for promoting tourism in Songkhla municipality by participation process. MUT Journal of Business Administration, 14(1), 198-227. [In Thai].

Castells, M. (1979). The urban question: A Marxist approach. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grassroots. California: University of California Press.

Chaiyaset, P. (2004). Pom Mahakan: The production of space (master’s thesis). Bangkok: Thammasat University. [In Thai].

Chantharapha, A. (2009). Four Region Slums Network: Identities and movement experiences. Bangkok: Four Region Slums Network. [In Thai].

Charoenporn, S. (1999). Social movement and organization: The case study of Ban Khrua community (master’s thesis). Bangkok: Thammasat University. [In Thai].

Charoenporn, S. (1999). Social movement and organization: The case study of Ban Khrua community (master’s thesis). Bangkok: Thammasat University. [In Thai].

Cress, D. M., & Snow, D. A. (2000). The outcomes of homeless mobilization: The influence of organization, disruption, political mediation, and framing. American Journal of Sociology, 105(4), 1063-1104.

De Soto, H. (1989). The other path. New York: Harper & Row.

Earl, J. (2000). Methods, movements, and outcomes. In P. G. Coy (Ed.), Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change (pp. 3-25). N.P.: Emerald Group Publishing.

Edwards, B., & McCarthy, J. D. (2004). Resources and social movement mobilization. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soul, & H. Kriesi (Eds), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 116-152). Maldem, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Elinoff, E. (2021). Citizen designs: City-making and democracy in Northeastern Thailand. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Fainstein, S. S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Glass, M. R., Woldoff R., & Morrison L. (2014). Does the middle class have rights to the city? Contingent rights and the struggle to inhabit Stuyvesant Town, New York. International Journal of Housing Policy, 14(3), 214-235.

Goodwin, J., & Jasper, J. M. (Eds.). (2014). The social movements readers: Cases and concepts. N.P.: John Wiley & Sons.

Harms, E. (2012). Beauty as control in the new saigon: Eviction, new urban zones, and atomized dissent in a Southeast Asian city. American Ethnologist, 39(4), 735-750.

Harvey, D. (2003). The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 939-941.

Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23-40.

Herzfeld, M. (2005). Appropriations of the appropriate: Policy and politeness in the negotiation of power at Pom Mahakan. N.P.: n.p.

Herzfeld, M. (2016). Siege of the spirits: Community and polity in Bangkok. Illinois: University of Chicago Press.

Kadi, J., & Ronald, R. (2014). Market-based housing reforms and the ‘right to the city’: The variegated experiences of New York, Amsterdam and Tokyo. International Journal of Housing Policy, 14(3), 268-292.

Khumprasert, I. (2007). The construction of representation of space for spatial rights (master’s thesis). Bangkok: Thammasat University. [In Thai].

Lefebvre, H., Kofman, E., & Lebas, E. (1996). Writings on cities. Oxford: Blackwell.

Mayer, M. (2009). The ‘right to the city’ in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements. City, 13(2-3), 362-374.

McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212-1241.

Mitprasat, M. (2002). Slum movement in Thailand. In P. Phongpaichit (ed.), Ways of lives, ways of fight: Contemporary people movement (pp. 354-406). Chiengmai, Silkworm Publishing.

Montgomery, C. (2019). Happy city: Transforming our lives through urban design (P. Phisitbutra, Trans). Bangkok: Broccoli.

Nattapattanun, E. (2016). The four regions slum network: The struggle for existence under the development projects of the Thai state from 1957-2010. Nakhon Pathom: Faculty of Arts, Slipakorn University. [In Thai].

Pattillo, M. (2013). Housing: Commodity versus right. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 509-531.

Phatharathananunth, S. (2006). Civil society and democratization: Social movements in Northeast Thailand. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.

Phundeamvong, C. (2016). Four Regions Slum Network’s process and participation in public policy advocacy on housing. Journal of Social Research, 39(1), 73-108. [In Thai].

Pintobtaeng, P. (1998). Politics on the street: Ninety-nine days of the assembly of the poor. Bangkok: Krirk University. [In Thai].

Pintobtaeng, P. (2009). Political framework analysis of the theory of social movement. Bangkok: Heinrich Boell Foundation Southeast Asia. [In Thai].

Pintobtaeng, P. & Unno A. (2002). Local fishermen network’s movement in southern Thailand: Case study of assembly of local fishermen in Andaman area. In P. Phongpaichit (ed.), Ways of lives, ways of fight: Contemporary people movement (pp. 282-352). Chiengmai, Silkworm Publishing.

Pongsawat, P. (2017). The human devouring town. Nonthaburi: Center for megacity and city studies.

Prakasvuthisarn, K. (2009). Social movements in Chiang Mai against problems from urbanization during 1997-2008. Social Sciences Journal, 1(21), 171-213. [In Thai].

Prakitnonthakan, C. (2006). Old wooden houses of Pom Mahakan Community (research report). Nakhon Pathom: Silpakorn University Research and Development Institute. [In Thai].

Ruthirako, P. (2018). Problems and obstacles of people who cycling in Hatyai city municipality and Khohong town municipality, Songkhla Province. University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce Journal Humanities and Social Sciences, 38(1), 54-70. [In Thai].

Sang-arun, N. (2012). The right to the city: The housing right movement of Bangbua Community. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies, 9(1), 1-12. [In Thai].

Sattayawatthana, C. (2004). Community rights of the Ban Khrua community in Bangkok and the social aspects of the effect of building express highway. Bangkok: Nititham. [In Thai].

Shin, H. B. (2013). The right to the city and critical reflections on China's property rights activism. Antipode, 45(5), 1167-1189.

Snow, D. A. (2004). Framing processes, ideology, discursive fields. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soul, & H. Kriesi (Eds), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 380-412). Maldem, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464-481.

Suesuan, Sin. (1987). The factors promoting people organization in the city: The case study of Ban Manangkhasila Community Credit Union Cooperative, Dusit District Bangkok. (master’s thesis). Bangkok: Thammasat University. [In Thai].

Tanthuwanit, N., S. Sholwilai, & S. Khotawinin. (2002). Fighting experiences of Pak Mul villagers: The case study of Pak Mun Dam and Rasisalai Dam. In P. Phongpaichit (ed.), Ways of lives, ways of fight: Contemporary people movement (pp. 182-236). Chiengmai, Silkworm Publishing.

Tarrow, S. G. (1994). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tiyawongsuwan, S. (2012). Roles of community-based organizations in the participation process for community development of developing country: A case study in Bangkok area (Doctoral dissertation). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [In Thai].

U-on, K., & Rojrudakorn, P. (2016). The development guidelines for green housing of Klong Nueng Pattana Community. Journal of the Faculty of Architecture King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, 18(23), 42-57. [In Thai].

Uitermark, J. (2009). An in memoriam for the just city of Amsterdam. City, 13(2-3), 347-361.

Usavagovitwong, N., Bunnag, K., & Vatanopas, N. (2018). Urban inequality in mega-urban region: The synoptic review from Thai’s context. Built Environment Inquiry, 17(2), 157-178. [In Thai].

Visetpricha, B. (2003). Four Region Slums Network: History and lessons. Samesky, 1(3), 68-92. [In Thai].

Visetpricha, B. (2008). The role of the people's movement in overcoming the problems of slum communities. Romphruk Journal, 26(2), 36-68. [In Thai].

Visetpricha, B. (2021). Sharing State Railway of Thailand’s land for urban poor’s housing. Retreved July 29, 2021, from https://waymagazine.org/land-and-right-housing-13/ [In Thai].

Williams, R. H. (2004). The cultural context of collective action: Constraints, opportunities, and the symbolic life of social movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soul, & H. Kriesi (Eds), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 91-115). Maldem, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Wongchum, S. (2005). Bicycling network development in Yala municipality (master’s thesis). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [In Thai].

Worasiangsuk, J. (2005). The roles and the perspectives of a sociologist in urban planning and Implementation processes: A case study of the planning of Thachang-Thaprachan, an old area of inner Bangkok. N.P.: n.p.

Worasiangsuk, J., & Khumprasert, I. (2011). How middle classes move to defend their space: A case study of an area in Chinatown, Bangkok. Thammasat Review, 14(1), 131-151.