Minor Patients’ Consents to Euthanasia: Comparative Study of the Netherlands, Belgium and the United Kingdom

Main Article Content

Sirintip Somjai

Abstract

Thailand has embraced passive euthanasia by recognizing the right to refuse treatments for extending life at the end of life or for relieving suffering, by virtue of Section 12 of National Health ACT B.E.2550 (2007).  This section does not provide the way in which minor patients give their consent to passive euthanasia. This results in a proposal to apply other rules – i.e. the rules relating to a minors’ capability to make decisions and give consent according to private law and medical practice, respectively – to this scenario. Nonetheless, there are discrepancies between those rules in terms of minors’ capabilities to give consent and their parents’ involvement in their consent processes. It is therefore unclear as to the way in which minor patients consent to passive euthanasia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Somjai, Sirintip. “Minor Patients’ Consents to Euthanasia: Comparative Study of the Netherlands, Belgium and the United Kingdom”. Naresuan University Law Journal 12, no. 1 (June 24, 2019): 47-66. Accessed March 9, 2021. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/lawnujournal/article/view/169638.
Section
Academic Articles

References

Alderson, Priscilla, and Morrow Virgania. The Ethics of Research with Children and Young People a Practical Handbook. 2nd ed. Chennai: C&M Digitals, 2011.

Alireza, Parsapoor. “Autonomy of Children and Adolescents in Consent to Treatment: Ethical, Jurisprudential and Legal Considerations.” Accessed March 12, 2017.
https://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4276576/.

Assche, Kristof van. “Recent Belgian Law Reform.” Accessed March 16, 2018. https://eol.law.dal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/law-of-28-may-2002-on-eutha
nasia-as- amended -by-the-law-of-13-february-2014.

Cuman, Giulia, and Chris Gastmans. “Minors and Euthanasia: A Systematic Review of Argument – Based Ethics Literature.” European Journal of Pediatrics 176, no.7 (2017): 837-847.

Dimond, Bridgit. Legal Aspects of Mental Capacity (A Practical Guide for Health and Social Care Professional). 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.

Encyclopedia of Sociology. “Personal Autonomy.” Accessed February 22, 2018. https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/encyclopedias-almancs-trascripts-
and-maps/personal-autonomy. Government of the Netherlands. “Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide.” Accessed July 7, 2018. https://www.government.nl/topics/euthanasia/euthanasia-assistedsuicide-
and-non-resuscitation-on-request.

ISSAN Lawyers. “The Living will in Thailand.” Accessed February 23, 2017. https://www.isaanlawyers. com/th/thelivingwillinthailand. [In Thai]

Jitti Tingsapat memorial Foundation. “ Euthanasia:The Consultation Models in Practice.” 6th the Books of Remembrance Day, Bangkok, 2001. [In Thai]

Jones, David Albert, Chris Gastmans And Calum Mackellar. Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Lessons from Belgium. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Kanit Nanakorn. Criminal Law. 6th ed. Bangkok: Winyuchon, 2017. [In Thai]

Kanit Nanakorn. Criminal Law: Offences. 10th ed. Bangkok: Winyuchon, 2010. [In Thai]

LaFollette, Hugh. Ethics in Practice: An Anthology. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2014.

Leviner, Pernilla. Stockholm Studies in Child Law and Children’s Right. Netherland: Koninklijke Brill, 2018.

Manning, Michael. “Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: Killing or Caring?.” Accessed February 20, 2017. https://www.chausa.org/docs /default-source/
health-progress/book-review---euthanasia-and-physician-assisted-suicide---killing-or-caring-pdf.pdf?sfvrsn=0.

Nordqvisit, Christian. “What are Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide?.” Accessed February 18, 2017. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/182951.php.

Pairuch Borvornsompong. “Child Victim Protection in Criminal Justice System and the Best Interest of the Child.” Master’s thesis, Faculty of Social Administration,
Thammasat University, 2005. [In Thai]

Paisan Limstit. “How to Create a Living will by Section of National Health ACT.” Folk Doctor 32, no. 381 (2011): 55. [In Thai]

Panuwat Lertsithichai. “Medical Research Ethics in Thailand: What should Be the Most Appropriate? an Analysis Based on Western Ethical Principles.” Journal-Medical Association of Thailand 87, no. 10 (2004): 1253-1261.

Sawang Boonchalermvipas, and Arnhang Yoomjinda. Medical Law. 2nd ed. Bangkok: Winyuchon, 2003. [In Thai]

Sawang Boonchalermvipas. “Giving and Understanding of Consent to Treatment in Section 8 of National Health ACT B.E.2550 (2007).” The Informed Consent Form Can Help Doctors Prosecuted? Conference, Center of Health, Law and
Ethics, Faculty of Law, Thammasat University, Bangkok, 2010. [In Thai]

Sawang Boonchalermvipas. “Right to Die is the Principle of Section 12 of National Health ACT B.E.2550 (2007).” Accessed February 23, 2017. https://www. gogood.in.th/ upload /article/ F_51_2. [In Thai]

Sleeboom, Margaret. “The Limitations of the Dutch Concept of Euthanasia.” Accessed March 27, 2018. https://www.eubios.info/EJ131/ej131j/htm.

Suttipong Kitchaicharoenporn. “Surrogate Informed Consent.” Master’s thesis, Faculty of Law, Thammasat University, 2014. [In Thai]

Verhaegen, Marie-Noelle, Jean Herveg, and Yves Poullet. “Les Droits du Patient Face su Traitement Informatise’ de Ses Donne’es Dans une Finalite’ the’Rapeutique:Les Conditions d’une Alliance Entre Informatique, Vie Prive’e et Sante’.”Accessed June 27, 2018. https://www.crid.be/pdf/public/4638.pdf.

Vitoon Eungprabhanth. “Right to Die.” Dunlaphaha 4, no. 43 (1996): 90-94. [In Thai]