Thai-Myanmar Maritime Dispute Settlement under the Dispute Settlement Mechanism of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: Lesson from the South China Sea Case
Main Article Content
Abstract
Thailand and Myanmar are involved in the maritime dispute from the river mouth of the Pakchan River to the Surin Island in the Andaman Sea. The dispute includes the territorial dispute over the Lham-Khan-Khi Nok Islands and the maritime boundary dispute, which is similar to the South China Sea dispute between the Philippines and China that in 2016 the Arbitral Tribunal constituted in accordance with Annex 7 of the 1982 United Nations on the Law of the Sea (the Arbitral Tribunal) ruled in favor to the Philippines. It is worthwhile to study that whether or not the Thai-Myanmar maritime dispute will be settled by the dispute settlement mechanism of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (the LOSC).
The study explores that the dispute settlement mechanism under the LOSC comprises traditional consent-based procedure and mandatory procedure. The first procedure may apply to all disputes not only the dispute concerning interpretation or application of the LOSC but it relies on the consents of the both countries. On the other hand, Thailand or Myanmar may initiate the compulsory procedure for merely some issues. However, the application of compulsory is not worth. Accordingly, the negotiation should be the best approaches which the both countries are familiar with and full of experiences.
Article Details
References
Bautista, Lowell Bautista., “Philippine Arbitration against China over the South China Sea.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Ocean Law and Policy 1, no.1, (2016): 121-126.
Churchill, R. R., and A.V. Lowe. The Law of the Sea. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992.
Harrison, James. Making the Law of the Sea: A Study in the Development of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Jantree Sinsuppraroek. The South China Sea Dispute. Bangkok: Nititham, 2018. [in Thai]
Jaturon Thirawat. Maritime Territory of Thailand: Legal Issues in Practice Relating to Neighboring Countries and International Community. Bangkok: Thammasat University Press, 1998. [in Thai]
Krisdakorn Wongwuthikun. The Compulsory Dispute Settlement System under the 1982 United Nations on the Law of the Sea: Lessons from the Courts and Arbitral Tribunals’ Judgments on Jurisdiction (Research Report). Bangkok: Faculty of Law, 2018. [in Thai]
Kuan-Hsiung, Wang Kuan-Hsiung. Peaceful Settlement of Disputes in the South China Sea Through Fisheries Resources Cooperation and Management, Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies 3, (2015): 1-44.
Merrills, J. G. Merrills. International Dispute Settlement. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Oxman, Bernard H. Oxman. “The South China Sea Arbitration Award.” University of Miami International Law & Comparative Law Review 24, (2017): 235-284.
Surakiat Satienthai. “Thai-Cambodian Maritime Overlapping Area: Problems and Development.” Security Studies Pamphlet, no. 92, (2011). [in Thai]
Thanom Chareonlap. Law of the Sea the Maritime Zones of Thailand. Bangkok: Winyuchon, 2007. [in Thai]
Thao, Nguyen Hong. “The 2002 Declaration on the Code of Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea: A Note.” Ocean Development and International Law 34, no.3-4, (2003): 279-285.
The United Nations. “United Nations Treaty Collection.” Accessed August 25, 2019.
https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXI-5&chap ter=21 &clang=_en#1.
Vasin Teeravechayan. “Delimitation of the Maritime Boundaries between Thailand and Her Neighbouring Countries.” Master’s thesis of Law, Faculty of Law,Chulalongkorn University, 1977. [in Thai]