The Insolvency Execution with Patent and Trademark

Authors

  • Krisda Apinawatawornkul LL.D. Student, Graduate School of Law, National Institute of Development Administration
  • Prapin Nuchplam Advisor
  • Wariya Lamlert External expert, Thesis Advisor Co, Graduate School of Law National Institute of Development Administration

Keywords:

bankruptcy enforcement, patent, trademark, alternative sale method

Abstract

This research article aims to study the enforcement of debt repayment through patents and trademarks in bankruptcy cases. In Thailand, there are three major issues regarding bankruptcy enforcement: the knowledge and expertise of official receivers, valuation of intellectual property, and the auction process. This study uses qualitative research methodology through the review of books, academic articles, and in-depth interviews with experts.

The findings reveal that the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940) and related laws, including the Intellectual Property Valuation Manual by the Department of Intellectual Property, Ministry of Commerce, do not specify the qualifications required for official receivers to effectively manage patents and trademarks. Furthermore, no legal provisions guide alternative methods of asset sales in bankruptcy cases, despite Section 123 of the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 allowing such sales with creditor committee approval. Although the valuation manual offers broad guidelines for assessing the value of patents and trademarks, the recommendations are too general, making practical application difficult.

The researcher recommends amending the Ministry of Justice’s Regulation on Bankruptcy Enforcement and Liquidation B.E. 2520 (1977) to include provisions for appointing assistant official receivers, defining their authority and duties, determining remuneration, overseeing procedures, setting financial guarantees, and establishing minimum qualifications. Moreover, the Intellectual Property Valuation Manual should be revised to better align with the specific characteristics of patents and trademarks.

References

Balmond, C., & Crinson, K. (2022). Restructuring & Insolvency. London: Law Business Research Ltd.

Banyat Suchiwa. (2004). Law on Property (8th ed.). Bangkok: Jirawat Printing.

Caracappa. J. (2021). Benjamin Holt and Jeffrey Reisner. Acquisition Tools for Purchasing IP During the Pandemic.

Chuchai Sirinil. (1985). Scope of power, duties and responsibilities of the receiver. Master's thesis, Chulalongkorn University.

Corporate Finance Institute (CFI). Stalking-Horse Bid a Deal with a Potential Buyer that is Hidden from the Public, Creditors, and the Courts. Retrieved November 23, 2021 from https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/Knowledge/deals/stalking-horse-bid/

Department of Intellectual Property and Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI). Manual for valuing intellectual property. Retrieved November 11, 2021, from http://www.ipthailand.go.th/images/3534/web_01052018/manual.compressed

Euan Khunkaew. (2013). Bankruptcy Law (11th ed.). Bangkok: Krung Siam Publishing.

Mason, R. G., & Setty, S. R. (2021). Bidding Procedures-Stalking-Horse Protections and Collusion. Retrieved November 23, 2021, from https://www.weil.com/~/media/files/pdfs/363salestopics.pdf

Reilly, R. F. (2015). Intellectual property and insolvency issues: Valuation of intellectual property within a bankruptcy context. Retrieved October, 31 2022, from https://willamette.com/pubs/presentations3/reilly_abi_conference_paper_2015.pdf

Sukanya Treephaichayonsak. (1998). Problems in the Application of Temporary Asset Protection Measures. Master’s Thesis, Thammasat University.

Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI). (2017). Study Report on Intellectual Property Valuation Project. Bangkok: Department of Intellectual Property, Ministry of Commerce.

Thammasat University Research and Consulting Institute. (2011). Complete research report, research project on the role of the receiver in managing the debtor's business and assets. Bangkok: Department of Enforcement, Ministry of Justice.

Thammasat University, Faculty of Law. (2016). Final Research Report on the Project to Upgrade Bankruptcy Enforcement to International Standards. Bangkok: Ministry of Justice, Legal Execution Department.

The American Bar Association. (2005). Intellectual property valuation: A primer for indentifying and determining value Chicago: American Bar Association.

U.S. Department of Justice. Office of the United States Attorneys. Debt Collection Enforcement System. Retrieved May 30, 2023 from https: //www.justice.gov/usao/resources/making-foia-request/major-information-systems/debt-collection-enforcement-system

Downloads

Published

2025-06-27

How to Cite

Apinawatawornkul, Krisda, ์Nuchplam Prapin, and Wariya Lamlert. “The Insolvency Execution with Patent and Trademark”. Law and Local Society Journal 9, no. 1 (June 27, 2025): 1–30. accessed December 9, 2025. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/llsj/article/view/277742.

Issue

Section

Research Article