Analysis and Consideration of the Sources of Political Instability in Thailand’s Democratic Process
Abstract
This research aims to 1) analyze and identify the root sources of the political instability in Thailand’s democratic process, 2) study factors affecting Thailand’s democratic process and 3) suggest new ideas as a guideline leading to Thailand’s true democracy. This research adopted the tools for documented research and the history of Thai politics.
The results proved that the key factor affecting Thailand’s democracy building strongly included frequent military intervention in politics, weakness of multi-party system, low development of civil society and no rule of law in democratic process. These phenomena related closely and directly to the political structure, the political party system and the political culture including the civil society. These have significant impact on the instability in Thailand’s democratic process.
The author comes up with the following suggestions. Thailand should strengthen its economy first. After the economic base flourishes and stabilizes, the supporting infrastructure should be improved and adjusted as appropriate to fit into the new economic base. The military role should be repositioned. The military should be controlled by a democratically elected government and become professional soldier. These are one of the main indicators of democratic country. Therefore, the military must not interfere in politics and be under a civilian government.
References
Apinya Dissamarn. “Thailand’s Reform and the Thai Political Crisis Exit,” King Prajadhipok's Institute, 2014.
Elinor Bartak. The Student Movement in Thailand 1970-1976. Australia: Centre of Southeast Asian Studies, Monash University, 1993.
James Ockey. “Thailand in 2006: Retreat to Military Rule.” Journal of Asian Survey Vol. 47, No.1 (2007): 23-32.
Jittima Arnsakulcharoen. “Classes and Age of Thai Politics and Government.” Journal of Nakhon Phanom University 5, Vol. 1 (2015): 7-9.
Kanala Sukpanich and Sujit Boonbongkan. “Military and Thai Political Development.” Thai Military Academic Pamphlet, Social Science Association of Thailand 1, Vol. 3 (1986): 20-22.
Prajak Kongkirati. “40 Years, 14 October-40 Years of Royal Nationalism-Democracy.” Prachatai (5 May 2018), https://prachatai.com/journal/2013/07/4769. (Retri eved on 23 December 2021).
Samuel P. Huntington. “Democracy's Third Wave.” The Journal of Democracy, 2 (1991): 23.
Seymour Martin Lipset. “Industrialization and Democracy, Industrialization and Demo cracy.” The University of Chicago Press Jounal 3, (1965): 353.
Somluck Songsamphan. “19 September 2006: Former Government Official Disclosed the Truth in New York When Thaksin Knew about the Coup D’état.” https://www.bbc.com/thai/58552609 (Retrieved on December 15, 2021).
Suthinan Suwanwijit and Worawit Klinsuk. “Military and Politics in Thailand.” Journal of Modern Learning Development 6, Vol. 2 (2021): 345.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Law and Local Society Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published are copyright of local law and society journals. Faculty of Law Surat Thani Rajabhat University
Content and information in articles published in local law and society journals It is the opinion and responsibility of the author of the article directly. which the journal editor It is not necessary to agree or share any responsibility for articles, information, content, images, etc. published in local law and society journals. It is the copyright of the local jurisprudence journal. If any person or entity wants to distribute all or part of it or to take any action must have prior written permission from the local jurisprudence journal only.