The Moderating Effect of CEO Gender on Relationship between CEO Tenure and Risk-taking

Authors

  • Duangnapa Sukhahuta คณะบริหารธุรกิจ มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีพระจอมเกล้าพระนครเหนือ วิทยาเขตระยอง

Keywords:

CEO gender, , CEO tenure , Risk-taking

Abstract

The objects of this study are 1) to analyze the relationship between CEO tenure and firm risk-taking and 2) to examine the effect of CEO gender as a moderator on the CEO tenure and risk-taking relationship of firms listed on Thai stock exchange. The data were collected from the stock exchange of Thailand The samples were 2,395 firm-year observations by using purposive sampling method. The result of the study shows that 1) CEO tenure has significantly negative association with risk-taking. According to Agency theory, CEOs as an agent concern making utilities for themselves instead of maximizing benefits to the shareholders. 2) The result also confirms that CEO gender is a moderator.  The effect of the interaction between CEO gender and CEO tenure is significantly positive to risk-taking at 0.01 level. This implied that the gender of CEO affects decision-making about investment risk. According to sub-group analysis, the relationship between CEO tenure and firm risk-taking is significantly negative at 0.01 level for male group. For female group, it shows the positive relationship between CEO tenure and firm risk-taking. But it is not significant. Thus, it can be concluded that the longer the male CEO held the position, the more dare they invested at risk.

References

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51(6), 1173–82.

Berger, P., Ofek, E., & Yermack, D. (1997). Managerial Entrenchment and Capital Structure Decisions. The Journal of Finance. 52(4), 1411-1438.

Cain, M. D., & Mckeon, S. B. (2014). CEO Personal Risk-Taking and Corporate Policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 51(1), 139-164.

Chaicharuscharoenlap, P. (2015). CEO Characteristics on Corporate Performance: The Case Study of Listed Companies on SET 100. (Master of Science Program in Finance). Bangkok University. [In Thai]

Chakraborty, A., Sheikh, S., & Subramanian, N. (2007). Termination Risk and Managerial Risk Taking. Journal of Corporate Finance. 13(1), 170-188.

Chen, D., & Zheng, Y. (2012). CEO Tenure and Risk-Taking. Working Paper. University of Baltimore. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=2038064.

Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2006). Managerial Incentives and Risk-Taking. Journal of Financial Economics. 79(2), 431-468.

Grimm, C., & Smith, K. (1991). Management and Organizational Change: A Note on the Railroad Industry. Strategic Management Journal. 12(7), 557-562.

Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms ‘Competitive Moves’. Administrative Science Quarterly. 41(4), 659-684.

Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998). Endogenously Chosen Boards of Directors and their Monitoring of the CEO. The American Economic Review. 88(1), 96–118.

Hirshleifer, D. A., Low, A., & Teoh, S. H. (2012). Are Overconfident CEOs Better Innovators? Journal of Finance. 67(4), 1457-1498.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 3(4), 305-360.

Kim, K., & Buchanan, R. (2011). CEO Duality Leadership and Firm Risk-Taking Propensity. Journal of Applied Business Research. 24(1), 27-41.

Martin, A. D., Nishikawa, T., & Williams, M. A. (2009). CEO Gender: Effects on Valuation and Risk. Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting. 48(3), 23–40.

Martino, P., Rigolini, A., & D’Onza, G. (2020). The Relationships Between CEO Characteristics and Strategic Risk-Taking in Family Firms. Journal of Risk Research. 23(1), 95-116.

Meijer, M. (2017). CEO Compensation and Risk-Taking: Evidence from the US Banking Industry. Master of Science in Finance. Tilburg University. Retrieved June 24, 2020, from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:cDdVkR8FytsJ:arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi

%3Ffid%3D145043+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=th

Muscarella, C., & Zhao, J. (2013). Promoting The Quiet Life or Risk-Taking? CEO Severance Contracts and Managerial Decision-Making. Working paper, Penn State University.

Peni, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2010). Female Executives and Earnings Management. Managerial finance. 36(7), 629-645.

Ryan, H. E., & Wang, L. (2012). CEO Mobility and the CEO-Firm Match: Evidence from CEO Employment History. Working paper, Georgia State University.

Serfling, M. A. (2013). CEO Age and the Riskiness of Corporate Policies. Journal of Corporate Finance. 25(C), 251-273.

Simsek, Z. (2007). CEO Tenure and Organizational Performance: An Intervening Model. Strategic Management Journal. 28(6), 653-662.

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance. 52(2), 737-783.

Wambugu, A. W., Gichira, R., Wanjau, K., & Mung’atu, J. (2015). The Relationship Between Risk Taking and Performance of Small and Medium Agro Processing Enterprises in Kenya. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management. 3(12), 441-455.

Walls, M. R. (2005). Corporate Risk-Taking and Performance: A 20 Year Look at the Petroleum Industry. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 48,127-140.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-02

How to Cite

Sukhahuta , D. . (2022). The Moderating Effect of CEO Gender on Relationship between CEO Tenure and Risk-taking. Modern Management Journal, 19(2), 1–12. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/stou-sms-pr/article/view/253013

Issue

Section

Research Articles