Consistency with Public Policy Principles of Thailand's 2018-2037 National Strategy Formulation Process

Authors

  • noppadol Udomwisawakul สาขาวิชาวิทยาการจัดการ มหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราช

Keywords:

Consistency, Public Policy Principles, National Strategy Formulation Process

Abstract

This research purposes, 1) To study the situation of Thailand's 2018-2037 national strategy formulation process. 2) To analyze the conformity of the public policy principles of Thailand's 2018-2037 national strategy formulation process. 3) To propose characteristics consistent with public policy principles for Thailand's 2018-2037 national strategy formulation process. It is a qualitative research based on public policy principles using secondary documents and information on Thailand's 2018-2037 national strategy formulation process. It found that 1) the formulation of the national strategy of Thailand has a legal status and enforceability from the submission of a draft law to the legislature for consideration. The National Strategy Committee advised the Cabinet to formulate the National Strategy 2018-2037, which has a period of 20 years. 2) The law stipulates that government policies must be consistent with the national strategy, characterized as the output and outcome of public institutions that are consistent with the Institutional model of public policy principles. Moreover, it is in line with the Elite model which values ​​the needs ​​of the elite in formulating. While national strategy must vary according to the time and context of each society's interpretation. 3) The formulation of national strategies should be consistent with the Group model that focuses on the participation of groups and people to create equilibrium. The key success of a national strategy is the flexibility with social context that should be consistent with the Group model based on the legal state and liberal democracy.

References

Barber, B. (2003). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. LA: U.C.P.

Bormanan, N. (2017). Administrative Law Principles for Public Services. Bangkok: Winyuchon.

Bryson, John M. (2004). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement. San Fran: J.W. & Sons.

Dye, Thomas R. (2005). Understanding Public Policy. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Frederickson, H. George and Smith, Kevin B. (2003). Public Administration Theory Primer. Oxford: Westview Press.

Gerston, N. Larry. (1997). Public Policy Making. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

Hogwood, W. Brian and Gunn, A. Lewis. (1984). Policy Analysis for the Real World. Britain: Oxford University Press.

Kraft, M. and Furlong, S. (2003). Public Policy: Politics, Analysis and Alternatives. USA: CQ Press.

Lindblom, C.E. (1995). The Intelligence of Democracy: Decision Making through Mutual Adjustment. New York: The Free Press.

Mintzberg, H. and Quinn, James B. (1996). The Strategy Process: Concepts, Contexts, Cases. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Udomwisawakul, N. (2017). Public Policy Agenda Setting. Nonthaburi: Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University Press.

Wamsley, L. Gary (et.al.). (1990). Refounding Public Administration. Newbury Park: SAGE.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-03

How to Cite

Udomwisawakul, noppadol. (2023). Consistency with Public Policy Principles of Thailand’s 2018-2037 National Strategy Formulation Process. Modern Management Journal, 21(1), 1–16. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/stou-sms-pr/article/view/264369

Issue

Section

Research Articles