THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT, EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT AND INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT OF EMPLOYEES IN THAI ORGANIZATIONS
Keywords:
Employee Involvement, Innovative work behavior, Organizational context, Employee EngagementAbstract
In a tough competitive environment, many firms try to differentiate themselves by employing innovative policies. The main objective of this study is aimed at exploring the relationship between employee’s involvement, engagement and innovative behavior of employees in Thai organizations. The 400 respondents in this study were senior employees and supervisors/managers in Marketing or R&D departments of firms that had obtained the Thailand Trust Mark (TTM) issued by the Ministry of Commerce Thailand. The survey employed a random sampling technique approach. The findings indicated that direct relationship of employee involvement and employee engagement have a statistically significant and positively effect on innovative work behavior but organizational context was found to have no statistical significance with innovative work behavior. Based on these findings it can be concluded that the policy of the organization should bond and fit with employee values, skills and capabilities such as job rotation, flexible job assignment, self-managed teams and compensation schemes such as profit sharing in order to create motivation, commitment and satisfaction of employees.
References
Anderson, N., de Dreu, C.K.W., & Nijstad, B.A. (2004). The Routinization of Innovation Research: A Constructively Critical Review of the State-of-the-Science, Journal of Organizational Behavior. 25, 147-173.
Anthony, S.D., Johnson, M.W. & Sinfield, J.V. (2008). Institutionalizing innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review. 49(2), 45-53.
Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, 5.
Am, C. S. (2015). The best practices for innovation within news organizations. Retrieved on March 09, 2017, from https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/ strategy-studies/best-practices-for-innovation
Angle, H., (1989). Psychology and organizational innovation, in A. H. Van de Van, A. H Angle, H.L. and M.S. Poole, Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies. Harper & Row, New York.
Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shop floor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 73, 265-285.
Bowen, F.E., Rostami, M. & Steel, P. (2010). Timing is everything: a meta-analysis of the relationships between organizational performance and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1179-1185.
Bower, J. L. & Yves L. Doz. (1979). Strategy formulation: A social and political process, In D.E. Schendel and C.W. Hofer (Eds.) Strategic Management. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 152-166.
Binnewies, C., Ohly, S., & Sonnentag, S. (2007). Taking personal initiative and communicating about ideas: What is important for the creative process and for idea creativity? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16, 432-455.
Blumentritt, T, Kickul, J. & Gundry, L. K. (2005). Building an Inclusive Entrepreneurial Culture: Effects of Employee Involvement on Venture Performance and Innovation. Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 77-84.
Coakes, E, & Smith, P (2007). Developing communities of innovation by identifying innovation champions: The Learning Organization. The international journal of knowledge and Organization Learning Management, 14(1), 74-85.
Dabos, G.E, & Rousseau, D.M (2004). Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts of employees and employers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 52-71.
Denison, R. D. (1990). Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. John Wiley, New York.
De Jong, J. & Den Hartog, D. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64.
De Jong, J. & Den Hartog, D. (2008). Innovative Work Behavior. Zoetermeer: Scales.
De Jong, J. & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.
Devloo, T., Anseel, F., Beuckelaer. A. D. & Salanova. M. (2014). Keep the fire burning: Reciprocal gains of basic need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation and innovative work behavior. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(4), 1-14.
Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational Climate for Creativity and Innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1(5), 105-123.
Gabcanova, I. (2011). The employees- the most important asset in the organization. Human Resources Management & Ergonomics, 1-12.
Hartmann, A. (2006). The role of organizational culture in motivating innovative work behavior in construction organizations. Construction Innovation, 3(6), 159-172.
Istance, D. (2011). Education at OECD: recent themes and recommendations. European Journal of Education, 46(1), 87-100.
Janssen, O. (2003). Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 347-364.
Janssen, O. (2004). How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 201–215.
Kahn, W.A. (1992). To be fully there: psychological presence at work. Human Relations, 45(4), 321-49.
Khazanchi, S., Lewis, M.W., & Boyer, K.K. (2007). Innovation-supportive culture: the impact of organizational values on process innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 871-884.
Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055-1080.
Knuppert, M. L. (2007). Employee-driven innovation – a trade union priority for growth and job creation in a globalized economy. The Danish Confederation of Trade Unions, 1-21.
Locke, E. A., & David M. S. (1979). Participation in Decision-Making: One More Look." In Barry M. Staw and Larry L. Cummings, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1, 265-339.
Lukes, M. & Stephan, U. (2017). Measuring employee innovation, A review of existing scales and the development of the innovative behavior and innovation support inventories across cultures. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(1), 136–158.
Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organizational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64-74.
Madhura, B. & Deepika, P. (2014). A study on the drivers of employee engagement impacting employee performance, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133, 106–115.
Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do Personal Characteristics and Cultural Values That Promote Innovation, Quality, and Efficiency Compete or Complement Each Other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 175-199.
Oke, A. (2007). Innovation types and innovation management practices in service companies.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(6), 564–587.
Rana, S., Ardichvili, A. & Tkachenko, O. (2014). A theoretical model of the antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement. Journal of Workplace Learning, 26(3/4), 249-266.
Rank, J., Pace, V.L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 518-528.
Richman, A. (2006). Everyone wants an engaged workforce how can you create it? Workspan, 49, 36-39.
Robinson, D. Perryman S. & Hayday, S. (2004). The Drivers of Employee Engagement. Institute for Employment Studies.
Shapiro, G. (2000). Employee involvement: opening the diversity Pandora’s Box?, Personnel Review, 29(3), 304 – 323.
Schaufeli. W. B. & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi sample study, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 25, 293-315.
Shuck, B., Reio, T. G. & Rocco, T. (2011). Employee engagement: An examination of antecedent and outcome variables, Human Resource Development International, 14, 427-445.
Santamaria, L., Nieto, M.J. & Miles, I. (2012). Service innovation in manufacturing firms: Evidence from Spain, Technovation, 32(2), 144-155.
Schneider, B. (1990). The climate for service: An application of the climate construct. In B. Schneider, Organizational climate and culture San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 383-413.
Scott, S. & Bruce, R. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
Smith, R. (2017). Work(er)-driven innovation, Journal of Workplace Learning, 29(2), 110–123.
Stafford, L. (2008). Social Exchange Theories. In L.A. Baxter and D.O. Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in 13 interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives. Thousand Oaks. 377-389.
Stalk, G., Evans, P., & Shulman, L. E. (1992). Competing on capabilities: The new rules of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 57-69.
Ulhoi, J. P. (2010). Employee-driven innovation: extending the license to foster innovation, Management Decision, 48(1), 65–84.
Van de Ven, & A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation, Management Science, 32(5), 590-607.
West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation and Creativity at Work. Oxford: John Wiley.
Xie, X., Wu, Y., & Zeng, S. (2016). A theory of multi-dimensional organizational innovation cultures and innovation performance in transitional economies: The role of team cohesion, Chinese Management Studies, 10(3), 458–479.
Yıldız, B., Uzun, S. & Coskun, S. S. (2017). Drivers of innovative behaviors: The moderator roles of perceived organizational support and psychological empowerment, International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 6, 341-360.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารวิชาการ สถาบันเทคโนโลยีแห่งสุวรรณภูมิ
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับสถาบันเทคโนโลยีแห่งสุวรรณภูมิ และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆในสถาบันฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว
