CORPORATE GOVERNANCE EFFECTS ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE LISTED COMPANIES ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE OF THAILAND

Authors

  • เบญจพร โมกขะเวส, ชาญชัย บัญชาพัฒนศักดา Shinawatra University

Keywords:

Corporate Governance, Financial Performance, The Stock Exchange of Thailand

Abstract

This research aims to study the corporate governance effects on financial performance of the listed companies on the Stock Exchange of Thailand. The sample consisted of 188 companies with the corporate governance scores from excellence to below good level, which the data was collected from annual data entry form, financial statements and annual report of the listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand during 2008-2017. The analysis of data and statistics used in quantitative analysis was included the percentage and the multiple regression analysis was used to test the hypotheses. The results of the study show that the companies with very good score on the corporate governance were 69 companies or 36.60%, the companies with below good level score were 59 companies or 31.40%, the companies with excellence score were 40 companies or 21.10%, and the companies with good score were 20 companies or 10.90%. The hypothesis testing of the corporate governance score (Sig. 14.694**), the independence of the chairman (Sig. 16.297**), the senior executives without merging the position (Sig. 12.497**), and the size of the board of directors (Sig 5.176**) are all affect the financial performance with the statistical significance at 0.01. However, the proportion of independent directors does not affect the financial performance.  

References

ตลาดหลักทรัพย์แห่งประเทศไทย. (2559). หลักการกำกับดูแลกิจการที่ดีของบริษัทจดทะเบียน. สืบค้นเมื่อ 16 กุมภาพันธ์ 2560, จาก https://www.set.or.th.

The Stock Exchange of Thailand. (2016). The Principles of Good Corporate Governance for Listed Companies. Retrieved February 16, 2017, from https://www.set.or.th.

รัฐนันท์ พงศ์วิริทธิ์ธร และคณะ. (2560). แบบจำลองของลักษณะองค์การที่เป็นเลิศที่มีอิทธิพลต่อผลการ ดำเนินงานของธุรกิจขนาดกลางและขนาดย่อมในเขตภาคเหนือของประเทศไทย. วารสารวิชาการ มหาวิทยาลัยฟาร์อีสเทิร์น. 11(2) : 224-239.

Pongwiritthon R., et al. (2017). Model of Characteristics of Excellence Organization that Influencing the Performance of Small and Medium Enterprise in Northern Region of Thailand. FEU Academic Review. 11(2): 224-239.

รัฐนันท์ พงศ์วิริทธิ์ธร. (2560). การเขียนแผนธุรกิจ SMEs เพื่อเสนอขอสินเชื่อ. เชียงใหม่: ศูนย์ถ่ายทอดองค์ความรู้ ภูมิปัญญาและนวัตกรรมชุมชน.

Pongwiritthon, R. (2017). Writing SMEs business plan for credit application. Chiang Mai, Thailand:Local Wisdom and Community Innovation, Information Center of Knowledge. (in Thai)

สมาคมส่งเสริมสถาบันกรรมการบริษัทไทย. (2559). รายงานการกำกับดูแลกิจการของบริษัทจดทะเบียนไทย (Corporate Governance Report of Thai Listed Companies 2016). สืบค้นเมื่อ 11 ธันวาคม 2559, จาก https://www.thai-iod.com. [in Thai]

Thai Institute of Directors. (2016). Corporate Governance Report of Thai Listed Companies 2016. Retrieved December 11, 2016, from https://www.thai-iod.com.

Coskun Metin & Sayilir Ozlem. (2012). Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Financial Performance of Turkish Companies. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(14): 59-64.

Hussin, N., & Othman, D. R. (2012). Code corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 6(2): 1-22.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, Agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): pp. 305-360.

Khatab, H. et al. (2011). Corporate governance and firm performance: A case study of Karachi
stock market. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 2(1): 39-43.

Krafft Jackie et al. (2013). Corporate Governance, Value and Performance of Firms: New
Empirical results on Convergence from a large international database. Working Paper.
University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, France.

Maher Maria & Anderson Thomas. (2000). Corporate Governance: Effect on firm performance
and economic growth. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development,
16(1): 1-40.

McColgan, P. (2001). Agency Theory and corporate governance: A review of the literature
from a UK perspective. Working paper. University of Strathclyde, UK.

Pham, P. K., Suchard J. A., & Zein, J. (2011). Corporate governance and alternative performance
Measures: Evidence from Australian firms. Australian Journal of Management, 36(3): 371-386.

Sunday, O. K. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance: The case of Nigerian listed firms. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences,
14(1): pp. 16-28.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-16

Issue

Section

Research Articles