COACHING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION MODEL FOR HOMEROOM TEACHERS OF SECONDARY VOCATIONAL SCHOOLS IN GUANGDONG PROVINCE
Keywords:
Coaching System Administration, Homeroom Teachers, Vocational EducationAbstract
Homeroom teachers in secondary vocational schools are a cornerstone of students’ holistic development, yet expanding responsibilities have caused substantial stress and professional burnout. Drawing on the PRACTICE coaching framework (capitalized consistently per academic convention), this study constructed and empirically validated a contextually tailored Coaching System Administration Model (CSAM) for Chinese vocational education. The model encompasses eight latent constructs: Problem Identification, Realistic Goal Setting, Alternative Solutions Generation, Consideration of Consequences, Feasibility Plan, Implementation Plan, Evaluation, and Emotional State. Using a mixed-methods design, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of 512 homeroom teachers from four regions in Guangdong Province and used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate the model. Results demonstrated robust internal consistency reliability, construct validity, and excellent model fit indices (χ²/df=1.982, CFI=0.960, TLI=0.951, RMSEA=0.044). Theoretically, this study extends the PRACTICE coaching framework to educational administration; practically, this model provides an empirically validated tool to promote teacher professional development and enhance student management in vocational education environments.
References
Aldrup, K., Carstensen, B., & Klusmann, U. (2024). The role of teachers’ emotion regulation in teaching effectiveness: A systematic review integrating four lines of research. Educational Psychologist, 59(2), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2282446
Comenius, J. A. (1986). Didáctica magna [The great didactic]. Ediciones Akal.
General Office of the CPC Central Committee, & General Office of the State Council. (2021, October 12). [Opinions on promoting the high-quality development of modern vocational education]. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. https://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/202110/t20211012_571737.html
Glover, T. A., Reddy, L. A., & Crouse, K. (2023). Instructional coaching actions that predict teacher classroom practices and student achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 96, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.10.006
Jackson, P. Z., & McKergow, M. (2007). The solutions focus: Making coaching and change SIMPLE (2nd ed.). Nicholas Brealey.
Libri, V. (2004). Beyond GROW: In search of acronyms and coaching models. The International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching, 2(1), 1–8.
Lü, H. G., & Liang, J. (2021). Investigation on the driving force of professional development of primary and secondary school homeroom teachers in the new era—An empirical study based on 21 cities in Guangdong Province. Educational Science Research, (12), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.12.007
Palmer, S. (2007). PRACTICE: A model suitable for coaching, counselling, psychotherapy and stress management. The Coaching Psychologist, 3(2), 71–77.
Ren, H. X. (2020). Research on reform and innovation in guiding the work of homeroom teachers under the people-oriented concept. New Wisdom, (33), 49–50. https://dianda.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=000030M9645425L0M9LO4R1C1D
Rui, Z. B. (2021). Research on the role positioning of homeroom teachers in secondary vocational schools in the new era. Chinese Vocational and Technical Education, 42(5), 13–17. https://dianda.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=00002EGI5V8G7JP0MNDO4JP1MJR
Wasik, B. H. (1984). Coping with parenting through effective problem solving: A handbook for professionals. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center.
Yang, L. J. (2022). Research on the current status and improvement strategies of class management of homeroom teachers in secondary vocational colleges. Asia Pacific Education, (5), 52–54. https://dianda.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=0000325219021G0M9TO4P1M20
Yang, S. P., & Wang, C. L. (2025). Analysis of the dilemma and new development path of secondary vocational education in China. Journal of Guangxi Education Institute, (2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.20208/j.cnki.1006-9410.2025.02.001
Yang, W. M., He, Z. H., & Lin, T. L. (2022). Class management stress among homeroom teachers: Influencing factors, coping approaches, and implications. Educator, (7), 68–69. https://dianda.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=0000326663945F0M9SO4R1E49
Zhang, J. J. (2022). Specific forms of school-enterprise cooperation in China. Industrial Technology and Vocational Education, 20(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2022.03.001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sarasas Suvarnabhumi Institute of Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The articles published are copyrighted by the Sarasas Journal of Humanities and Social Science. The opinions expressed in each article in this academic journal are those of the individual authors and do not reflect the views of Sarasas Suvarnabhumi Institute of Technology. The authors are solely responsible for all aspects of their respective articles. Any errors or inaccuracies in the articles are the sole responsibility of the authors.
