Factors Affecting the Practice, Examination, Analysis, and Action Guidelines that Result in the Investigation of Disinformation.

Abstract

This article presents the results of the study factors affecting the practice, examination, and analysis to find disinformation and action guidelines that resulted in the practice of disinformation of a sample of 482 students. It was found that it was able to forecast the practice, examine, and analyze to find disinformation and could be explained correctly by 55.1% by using factors; (1) news experience that indicates the presence of disinformation and affects how clear, based on the credibility, place, time, and third party it is, if there are unclear and assumed to be distorted data and forecast is 40.4% accurate, (2) news experience in which there is an indicator of disinformation affects the analysis of other anomalies whose elements indicate that disinformation in the news is likely to be predictable with 39.4% accuracy, (3) news experience in which there is an indicator of disinformation affecting the review of websites or other news sources can be predicted with 39.5% accuracy, (4) news experience with indications that disinformation affects the accompanying image can be searched from Tineye whether the image is an old image that has been posted, and if it is used it is a disinformation which able to forecast with accuracy 38.6%, (5) news experience with indications of disinformation in news affecting search engines may also be notified by agencies that verify that misinformation in news can be predicted correctly 32.6%, and (6) news experience with indicators of disinformation resulting in inquiries from trustworthy agencies, such as the Anti-Fake News Center of Thailand, the Centers for Sure Before Sharing Thai News Agency, Able to forecast with accuracy 37.5%. The studied through key indicators including; Publishing purpose, Layout of images and graphics, News sources and citations, Headlines and terms used, News writing style, Censorship and comparison, and Types of news. All abnormalities were statistically significant at the .05 level.