Ethical standards on behalf of communicators via social media according to social norm
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract
The objectives of this study were: 1) To study the ethical standards of mass media and social norms to develop best practices 2) To guidelines for traditional media professionals and online media in the country 3) To make recommendations for policy implementation to promote ethics and professional standards of traditional media and online media through the developmental perspective of regulatory guidelines from 3 countries: Taiwan, The Federal Republic of Germany and the United States of America. Research methods are primary data collection is a small group seminar in 5 regions and secondary data. The results of the study revealed that from the guidelines for supervision in 3 countries, the participants wanted to have 4 characteristics as well, namely self-regulation, supervision joint, supervision and supervision by the state. There were not based on social norms, concepts, or theories and unethical was found: biased, stereotypical, insulting, hateful, incitement, division, exaggeration, distortion, and fake news. The policy recommendation is to promote lifelong learning. Media literacy training, AI development, content detection, law amendment and collaboration with academia and other sectors. Determine guidelines to prevent Cyber Crime and access to the Internet equally. Practical Suggestions: The preparation of a manual for senders for the 4 Keng is creative, inspecting, caring, neutral and all-round, and for the 4 Keng receivers: questioning, searching, alerting and lifelong learning.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Amornviputpanich, P. (2018). The guidelines of ethical practice for citizen journalism in the era of social media. Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Communication Arts Program, Faculty of Communication Arts, Dhurakij Pundit University.
Bunsiriphan, M. (2013). Introduction to journalism: Philosophy and concepts. Bangkok: Thammasat University Press.
Communication Policy Center Department of Communication Arts Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. (n.d.). Guidelines for mass media, both mainstream and digital media, through 5 important principles. n.p.
Jommoon, R. (2021). The legal measure to regulate and control political fake news on cyberspace. Graduate School Chiang Mai University.
Leelayouth, P., & Otsu, B. (2017). Ethics and code of ethics of journalism in the era digital media. Journal of Graduate Studies Review Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University, 13(2), 176-189.
National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC). (2019). Fast checking new tool to promote media ethics. Retrieved from https://procheck.nbtc.go.th/articles/ detail/79
Panthong, W. (2022). Looking at 5 European nations to deal with political misinformation. Retrieved from https://www.naewna.com/politic/columnist/52295
Ramasoota, P. (2013). Internet Content Governance. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Singlor, T. (2022). SDG Updates: The role of the media in SDGS on a day when news and facts are mixed with distortions and media freedom are threatened. Retrieved from https://www.sdgmove.com/2021/08/24/sdg-updates-role-of-journalists-for-sdgs-in-the-time-of-misinformation-and-threats/
Wongphasuksathaporn, P. (2019). Lessons learned from countering fake news from Taiwan. Retrieved from https://www.isranews.org/content-Page/item/77599-fake-Newes-77599.html
Taiwan Media Watch Foundation. (2017). Taiwan media watch Retrieved from https://www.mediawatch.org.tw/node/8104