Guidelines for developing good practices and ethical standards for presenting content on online media related to Hate Speech, Cyberbullying and Radicalization of the Thai Media Fund -
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study intends to investigate the prevalence of hate speech, cyberbullying, and radicalization in Thai online media. To outline policies for immediate, medium-term, and long-term operations in Thailand as well as the role of the Thai Media Fund in developing ethical principles for hate speech, cyberbullying, and radicalization that emerges in online media. Data from 20 groups of participants, totaling 300 people, were gathered using online focus groups as part of qualitative research. The results showed that the problems include dissemination of pornography, use of text and images that are inappropriate for the monarchy. Someone posted contents intended to bury people with physical disabilities or abnormalities. The ease with which contents may be created and accessed via social media is one of the main contributors to the issues. Lack of morals is another element that influences people to post content for commercial purposes using inappropriate media, images, phrases, or messages. There are numerous websites and applications that have been identified as platforms or online media for the dissemination of bullying and radicalization, including Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Clubhouse, and others. The reputation and dignity of a person can be destroyed by hate speech, cyberbullying, and radicalization, which can have a profound effect on society, culture, and a country.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Abuse Counseling and Treatment, Inc. (2023). Social-ecological model of violence. Retrieved from https://actabuse.com/services/community-education/prevention/social-ecological-model-1024x520/
Bangkok Media and Broadcasting Company Limited. (2021). How to deal with bullying problems that should not be viewed as normal. Retrieved from https://www.pptvhd36.com/health/how-to/4088
British Institute of Human Rights (2012) Mapping study on projects against hate speech online. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/16807023b4mk
Cramer, J. R., Fording, R. C., Gerstenfeld, P., Kehn, A., Marsden, J., Deitle, C., King, A., Smart, S., & Nobles, M. R. (2020). Hate-motivated behavior: Impacts, risk factors, and interventions. Retrieved from https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/ hpb20200929.601434/
Duangthai, T., & Promsit, S. (2019). Mayhem in the cyber world. Journal of Management Science Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University, 1(1), 1-15.
Henares-Montiel, J., Benítez-Hidalgo, V., Ruiz-Pérez, I., Pastor-Moreno, G., & Rodríguez-Barranco, M. (2022). Cyberbullying and associated factors in member countries of the European Union: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with representative population samples. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 1-13.
Isra News Agency. (2021). Ranked top in Asia! Nearly half of Thai children believe that "bullying" is typical, and over 80% of them have experienced it. Retrieved from https://www.isranews.org/article/isranews-article/105059-isranews-bullying.html
Israel, B. A., Checkoway, B., Schulz, A., & Zimmerman, M. (1994). Health education and community empowerment: Conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational, and community control. Health Education Quarterly, 21(2), 149-170.
Kokiatpitak, K., & Thepwan, N. (2021). Violent extremism. Security Perspective Journal, 6 (February-May). Retrieved from https://www.nsc.go.th/wp-content/uploads/Journal/article-00605.pdf
Komchadluek. (2023). The bullying situation in Thailand is severe. The online crisis makes the marks of bullying last longer. Retrieved from https://www.komchadluek.net/quality-life/well-being/540559
Krueger, R. A. (1998). Moderating focus groups, focus group kit. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
National Statistical Office. (2021). Survey of technology use. Household information and communication 2021 (2nd quarter). Retrieved from http://www.nso.go.th/sites/2014/DocLib13/%E0%B8%94%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%B2% E0% %AD%E0%B8%99/2564/report_64.pdf
Oguz, A., Mehta, N., & Palvia, P. (2023). Cyberbullying in the workplace: A novel framework of routine activities and organizational control. Internet research, In print.
Phattharathamrong, P. (2016). Exposure to and opinions on hate speech content among online media receivers: A case study of Facebook fan page. “Stop prettifying Thailand”. Thammasat University.
Phianjad, D., Sinthaworn, W., & Kosila, J. (2020). Promoting awareness about cyberbullying and verbal abuse of students at the basic education level: A case study schools in Chachoengsao province. Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University, Chachoengsao.
Prince, M., & Davies, M. (2001). Moderator teams: An extension to focus group methodology. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 4(4), 207-216.
Prevent Connect. (2023). Socio-ecological model. Retrieved from https://wiki.preventconnect.org/socio-ecological-model/
Ramasutta, P. (2015). Conflict of speech and the online world. Bangkok: Foundation for Education Democracy and development (Torch Publishing Project).
Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (2002). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Huberman, M.A. & Miles, M.B. (eds). The Qualitative Research Companion. London: Sage Publications, 305-329.
Statista. (2023). Cyber bullying-statistics & facts. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/topics/1809/cyber-bullying/#topicOverview
Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks. California: Sage.
Surat, P. (2018). Causes and consequences related to bullying through the cyber world: A case study of Thai youth who were bullied. Retrieved from
Thai Health Promotion Foundation. (2020). Communication that creates hate (Hate speech). Retrieved from http://cclickthailand.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/hate_speech_FINAL.pdf
The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2022). Guidance note from pilots to practice: Risk-informed utilization of online data for preventing violent extremism and addressing hate speech. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2022-05/UNDP-Guidance-Note-Risk-Informed-Utilization-of-Online-Data-for-PVE-and-Addressing-Hate-Speech.pdf