Crisis Resilience Developing an Integrated Public Disaster Communication System for Bangkok

Authors

  • Titipat Iamnirun School of Communication Arts, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University

Keywords:

Integrated Disaster Management, Crisis Communication, Industrial Sector, Public Participation, 2025 Building Collapse

Abstract

This research aims to 1) study the current state of public disaster management and crisis communication in Bangkok; 2) analyze best practices from the industrial sector, and 3) develop integrated disaster communication guidelines. Using qualitative research methodology through a case study of the 2025 building collapse incident, data was collected via in-depth interviews and focus groups with 16 stakeholders. The findings revealed that: 1) Bangkok's disaster management and crisis communication face challenges including lack of unified command, delayed and conflicting communication, insufficient preparedness, and limited public participation; 2) Best practices from the industrial sector demonstrate strengths in centralized command systems, integrated technology utilization, continuous personnel development, and strong safety culture; 3) Integrated disaster communication guidelines encompass six dimensions: command system reform, integrated communication system development, community participation enhancement, technology application, specialized personnel development, and legal framework improvement for transparency. The study's theoretical contributions include the “Adaptive Cross-sector Integration Model” that applies industrial practices to urban contexts, the development of an “Integrated Crisis Communication Platform” serving as a Single Source of Truth, and the “Community-centered Resilience Building” concept that positions communities as owners of disaster management systems. These research findings provide guidelines for enhancing Bangkok's disaster management capabilities toward greater efficiency and sustainability.

References

กรมป้องกันและบรรเทาสาธารณภัย. (2564). แผนการป้องกันและบรรเทาสาธารณภัยแห่งชาติ พ.ศ. 2564-2570. https://ndwc.disaster.go.th/ndwc/cms/2744?id=44525

กรมโยธาธิการและผังเมือง. (2566). รายงานการสำรวจความเสี่ยงอาคารสูงในกรุงเทพมหานคร. กรมโยธาธิการและผังเมือง.

กรมทรัพยากรธรณี. (2565). รายงานการศึกษารอยเลื่อนมีพลังในประเทศไทย. กรุงเทพฯ: กรมทรัพยากรธรณี.

ธนชาติ นุ่มนนท์. (2562). การประยุกต์ใช้ระบบบัญชาการเหตุการณ์ (ICS) ในการจัดการสาธารณภัยของประเทศไทย: ความท้าทายและโอกาส. วารสารวิจัยและพัฒนา มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏหมู่บ้านจอมบึง, 4(1), 55-68.

สำนักป้องกันและบรรเทาสาธารณภัย กรุงเทพมหานคร. (2567). รายงานสถิติเหตุเพลิงไหม้ในกรุงเทพมหานคร ปี พ.ศ. 2566. https://data.bangkok.go.th/organization/19000000?organization=19000000&_groups_limit=0&groups=garbageindist&license_id= License+not+specified

Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163-176.

Coombs, W. T. (2019). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Deniz, T., Taşan-Kok, T. B. T., & Eraydın, A. (2023). Coordination analysis in disaster management: A qualitative approach in Türkiye. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 111, 104672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104672

Galanti, L., et al. (2024). Placing engineering in the earthquake response and the survival chain. Nature Communications, 15, Article 4298. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48624-3

Kapucu, N., & Garayev, V. (2016). Structure and network performance: Horizontal and vertical networks in emergency management. Administration & Society, 48(8), 931-961.

Li, Y., & Liu, Q. (2023). Inter-organizational collaboration networks in disaster management: A systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 85, 103487.

Oh, O., Agrawal, M., & Rao, H. R. (2013). Community intelligence and social media services: A rumor theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 407-426.

Pelling, M. (2011). Adaptation to climate change: From resilience to transformation. Routledge.

Reynolds, B., & Seeger, M. W. (2005). Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of Health Communication, 10(1), 43-55.

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2015). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015-2030. UNDRR.

Vermiglio, C., Noto, G., Bolívar, M. P. R., & Zarone, V. (2022). Disaster management and emerging technologies: A performance-based perspective. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(4), 1093-1117.

World Bank & Royal Thai Government. (2012). Thai flood 2011: Rapid assessment for resilient recovery and reconstruction planning. World Bank.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yu, X., Hu, X., Song, Y., Xu, S., Li, X., Song, X., ... & Wang, F. (2024). Intelligent assessment of building damage of 2023 Turkey-Syria Earthquake by multiple remote sensing approaches. NPJ Natural Hazards, 1(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44304-024-00003-0

U.S. Geological Survey. (2024). Plan to coordinate post-earthquake investigations supported by the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP). U.S. Department of the Interior. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/cir1542

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). (2024). Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction (GAR 2024). United Nations. https://www.undrr.org/gar

Downloads

Published

2025-09-19

How to Cite

Iamnirun, T. (2025). Crisis Resilience Developing an Integrated Public Disaster Communication System for Bangkok. STOU Academic Journal of Research and Innovation (Humanities and Social Science), 5(2), 79–102. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/InnovationStou/article/view/281333

Issue

Section

Research Articles