THE EFFECT OF LEADERSHIP STYLE MODEL ON NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE THROUGH SUSTAINABLE SUPPLIER SELECTION AND LEAN MANAGEMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIES IN CHINA

Authors

  • Chanathip Choeyada Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi
  • Chow Rojanasang Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi
  • Chanongkorn Kuntonbutr Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi
  • Sudaporn Sawmong King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang

Keywords:

Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Sustainable Supplier Selection, Lean Management, Electrical and Electronic Industries in China

Abstract

          The objectives of this research article were to 1) study factors of transformational leadership style, transactional leadership style on new product development performance, 2) study the influence of transformational and transactional leadership factors on new product development performance, and 3) develop the effect of transformational leadership and transaction leadership model influence on new product development performance through sustainable supplier selection and lean management. This mixed-methods research is between quantitative and qualitative research. The simple random sampling in electrical and electronic industries in China. The sample population consisted of 2,414 samples. The sampling group's collecting data were taken from middle to top management levels with 518 samples. The data analysis employed a structural equation model. For qualitative research, employed structural interview method from 10 middle to top management level. The results showed that transaction leadership factors (TSL) influence new product development performance (NPD) (TE = 0.68), affect lean management (LM) (TE = 0.70), and influence sustainable supplier selection (SSS) (TE = 0.68). Sustainable supplier selection (SSS) effect on new product development performance (NPD) (TE = 0.44) lean management (LM) (TE = 0.56) and lean management (LM) affect new product development performance (NPD) (TE = 0.74) and directly influences 0.74 were statistically significant at 0.01 level. The findings are as follows. Transactional leadership directly influences sustainable supplier selection and lean management and indirectly influences new product development performance. Sustainable supplier selection indirectly influences new product development performance. Lean management had a direct influence on new product development performance in China. Transformational leadership had no influences statistically insignificant.

References

สุภมาส อังศุโชติ และคณะ. (2551). สถิติวิเคราะห์สาหรับการวิจัยทางสังคมศาสตร์และพฤติกรรมศาสตร์: เทคนิคการใช้โปรแกรม LISREL. กรุงเทพมหานคร: มิสชั่น มีเดีย.

Abdollahi, M. et al. (2015). An integrated approach for supplier portfolio selection: Lean or agile? Expert Systems with Applications, 42(1), 679-690.

Albukhitan, S. (2020). Developing Digital Transformation Strategy for manufacturing. Procedia Commuter Science, 11(170), 664-671.

Alefari, M. et al. (2017). The role of leadership in implementing lean manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 27(63), 756-761.

Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337-342.

Bao, Y. et al. (2017). Do resource differences between manufactures and suppliers help or hinder product innovation of manufactures? The moderation role of trust and contracts. Industrial marketing management, 16(64), 79-90.

Birasnav, M. (2014). Knowledge management and organizational performance in the service industry: The role of transformational leadership beyond the effects of transactional leadership. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1622-1629.

Bortolotti, T. et al. (2015). Successful lean implementation: Organizational culture and soft lean practices. International Journal of Production Economics, 28(160), 182-201.

Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.

Cheng, C. & Yang, M. O. (2019). Creative process engagement and new product performance: The role of new product development speed and leadership encouragement of creativity. Journal of Business Research, 76(99), 215-225.

Cooper, R. G. (2019). The drivers of success in new-product development. Industrial Marketing Management, 47(76), 36-47.

Corbett, F. & Spinello, E. (2020). Connectivism and leadership: harnessing a learning theory for the digital age to redefine leadership in the twenty-first century. Heliyon, 6(1), 1-9.

Dalenogare, L. S. et al. (2018). The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 31(204), 383-394.

David, G. (2017). Consumer Electronics Industry Report. Retrieved June 20, 2020, from https://intrepidsourcing. com/industry-reports/electronic-components-assembly-industry-report/

Dombrowski, U & Mielke, T. (2014). Lean Leadership – 15 rules for a sustainable lean implementation. Procedia CIRP, 2(17), 565-570.

Du, J. & Chen, Z. (2018). Applying Organizational Ambidexterity in strategic management under a “VUCA” environment: Evidence from high tech companies in China. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2(1), 42-52.

Elverum, C. W. et al. (2016). Prototyping in new product development: Strategy considerations. Procedia CIRP, 4(50), 117-122.

Fadnavis, S. et al. (2020). An assessment of organizational culture traits impaction problem Impacting problem solving for lean transformation. Procedia Manufacturing, 6(48), 31-42.

Gelard, P. et al. (2014). Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Knowledge Management. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 12(2), 67-82.

Giovanni, P. D. (2020). Process innovation through industry 4.0 technologies, lean practices and green supply chains. Retrieved June 20, 2020, from https://doi. org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100869

GRI. (2020). GRI standards. Retrieved June 20, 2020, from https://www.globalre porting.org/how-to-use-the-gri-standards/gri-standards-english-language/

Hair, J. F. et al. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. ( 7 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice Hall: Pearson.

Jia, F. et al. (2019). Multi-tier sustainable supply chain management: The role of supply chain leadership. International Journal of Production Economics, 32(217), 44-63.

Kotler, P. & Armstrong, G. (2016). Principles of marketing. (16 ed.). England: Pearson education limited.

Kotula, M. et al. (2015). Strategic sourcing supplier selection misalignment with critical success factors: Findings from multiple case studies in Germany and the United Kingdom. Int. J. Production Economics, 166(2015), 238-247.

Lei, Y. et al. (2021). Does Urban planning affect urban growth pattern? A case study of Shenzhen, China. Land Use Policy, 101(2021), 1-13.

Liu, L. (2018). IoT and A Sustainable City. Energy Procedia, 53(2018), 342-346.

Melander, L. & Vega, H. L. (2013). Impact of technological uncertainty in supplier selection for NPD collaborations: literature review and a case study. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 9(4), 323-339.

Mohammad, I. S. & Oduoza, C. F. (2019). Interactions of lean enablers in Manufacturing SMEs using interpretive structural modelling approach-a case study of KRI. Procedia Manufacturing, 5(38), 900-907.

Mokhtar, A. R. M. M. et al. (2019). Supply chain leadership: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. International Journal of Production Economics, 32(216), 255-273.

Ngai, C. S. B. et al. (2020). A comparative study of the linguistic manifestations of intertextuality in corporate leaders’ messages of global corporations in the US and China. English for specific purposes, 40(60), 65-84.

Ojha, D. et al. (2018). Transformational leadership and supply chain ambidexterity: Mediating role of supply chain organizational learning and moderating role of uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 31(197), 215-231.

Schuh, G. et al. (2018). Defining scaling strategies for the improvement of agility performances in product development projects. Procedia CIRP, 6(70), 29-34.

Shashi, C. P. et al. (2019). The impact of leanness and innovativeness on environmental and financial performance: Insights from Indian SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 212(June 2019), 111-124.

Shin, N. & Park, S. (2021). Supply chain leadership driven strategic resilience capabilities management: A leader-member exchange perspective. Journal of Business Research, 73(122), 1-13.

Stechert, C. & Balzerkiewitz, H. P. (2020). Digitalization of a Lean Product Development organization. Procedia CIRP, 9(91), 764-769.

Stich, V. et al. (2020). Measures for a successful digital transformation of SMEs. Procedia CIRP, 8(93), 286-291.

The Innovation Research Interchange. (2019). 2019 R&D Trends Forecast Results from the Innovation Research Interchange's Annual Survey. Research-Technology Management, 62(2), 21-30.

Tortorella, G. L. et al. (2020). Identifying pathways to a high-performing Lean Automation implementation: an empirical study in the manufacturing industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 33(231), 1-13.

Yun, S. et al. (2019). Technology development strategies and policy support for the solar energy industry under technological turbulence. Energy Policy, 46(124), 206-214.

Zawadzki, P. & Żywicki, K. (2016). Smart product design and production controlfor effective mass customization in the industry 4.0 concept. Management and Production Engineering Review, 7(3), 105-112.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-30

How to Cite

Choeyada , C. . ., Rojanasang , C. . ., Kuntonbutr , C. ., & Sawmong, S. . . . (2022). THE EFFECT OF LEADERSHIP STYLE MODEL ON NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE THROUGH SUSTAINABLE SUPPLIER SELECTION AND LEAN MANAGEMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIES IN CHINA. Journal of Buddhist Anthropology, 7(3), 332–348. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSBA/article/view/252866

Issue

Section

Research Articles