THE POLITICS OF THE TRANSFER OF MISSIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL ROADS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION

Abstract

The Objectives of this research article were to: 1) political developments affecting the mission transfer policy of the department of rural roads 2) the role and relationship of politicians, government officials, business groups, and local government organizations that have conflicts of interest to support each other in the transfer. Transfer of missions of the department of rural roads 3) Roles, powers, and duties of the department of rural roads in the case of mission transfers in the event of having to terminate under Section 54 as required by law and 4) Problems, obstacles, and recommendations for the transfer of missions of the Department of Rural Roads. This research is qualitative research. Data were collected from documents, and In-depth interviews with 16 key informants were purposive random sampling. Analyzing descriptive data, the study results revealed that, The development of mission transfer was delayed due to current problems. Political flows and policy flow under the constitution and the act determining plans and procedures for decentralization of power to local government organizations, B.E. Thinkers make suggestions but don't have the power to drive them. As for the political base of the business group, it is the stakeholders who come to use the area of the local government to create bargaining power under the relationship of different groups of people. According to Section 54, there is still unclear duplication of authority. The limitations of the bureaucratic mechanism affect the efficiency and independence in solving road safety problems. The participation of network partners must be created by a central figure. Coordinate region local practice.