The Study of Needs of Stakeholders for Develop the quality of Master of Education Program in Teaching Science and Technology

Main Article Content

Tuangthong Boonmachai
Piyatida Supa
Umporn Wutchana

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to study the needs of stakeholders regarding the development of Master of Education program in Teaching Science and Technology. The findings are intended to guide the improvement and enhancement of the curriculum to ensure its quality and responsiveness to the needs of learners and society. A mixed-methods approach was employed, incorporating both qualitative and quantitative research methods. Data were collected using in-depth interviews and questionnaires from 71 stakeholders. The results revealed that most respondents were science and technology teachers at the primary or secondary education levels working in public institutions. There was a strong demand for a curriculum that integrates scientific content with daily life, incorporates technology in learning management, and promotes analytical thinking and problem-solving skills. Additionally, appropriate characteristics such as social responsibility and adaptability to change were emphasized. The interview results were consistent with the survey findings, with all stakeholder groups highlighting the importance of knowledge and skills necessary for science teachers in the 21st century, particularly science content knowledge, technology integration skills, and learning design. Furthermore, they desired graduates to possess the characteristics of modern teachers who are proactive in adapting and engaging in lifelong learning. In conclusion, the findings of this research demonstrate the diverse and comprehensive needs of stakeholders for the development of the Master of Education Program, which will be highly beneficial for informing the improvement and development of the Master of Education Program in Teaching Science and Technology to ensure its quality and genuine responsiveness to the needs of learners and society.

Article Details

How to Cite
Boonmachai, T., Supa, P., & Wutchana, U. (2025). The Study of Needs of Stakeholders for Develop the quality of Master of Education Program in Teaching Science and Technology. Journal of Science and Science Education (JSSE), 8(2), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.14456/jsse.2025.16
Section
Research Articles in Science Education

References

Albarra Shidiq, G., Promkaew, S. and Faikhamta, C. (2022). Trends of competencies in teacher education from 2015 to 2020: A Systematic Review Analysis. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 43(1), 257-264.

Bakri, F., Permana, H., Fitriani, W., Ambarwulan, D. and Muliyati, D. (2021). The development of 21st century skills and competence in service teacher through TPACK training workshop. The 9th National Physics Seminar 2020 (pp.1-5). Jakarta State University: Jakarta.

Caratozzolo, P., Cukierman, U., Nørgaard, B., Schrey-Niemenmaa, K., Azofeifa, J. D. and Rueda-Castro, V. (2024). Future skills forecasting: ensuring quality learning for every segment of the workforce. EDUCON 2024 - IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference Proceedings (pp.1-5). Mexico: Institute for the Future of Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey.

Darlis, V. and Yolanda, D. R. (2021). Development of Monitor and Evaluation System of Learning Process Towards ASEAN University Network-Quality Assurance Criteria. The 3rd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2020) (pp.1-5). Greece: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

Faikhamta, C. (2013). The development of in-service science teachers’ understandings of and orientations to teaching the nature of science within a PCK-based NOS course. Research in science education, 43, 847-869.

Johnson, O. C. B. (2017). The impact of ASEAN university network-quality assurance (AUN-QA) assessment on the quality of educational programmes. In Theory and practice of quality and reliability engineering in Asia industry (pp. 87-97). Springer.

Kwok, A. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ classroom management beliefs and associated teacher characteristics. Educational Studies, 47(5), 609-626.

Malhotra, M. K. and Grover, V. (1998). An assessment of survey research in POM: from constructs to theory. Journal of operations management, 16(4), 407-425.

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2023). List of schools in the offices of the Office of the Basic Education Commission. Retrieved 3 March 2025, from Bopp: http://www.bopp.go.th/?page_id=878

Petko, D., Mishra, P. and Koehler, M. J. (2025). TPACK in context: an updated model. Computers and Education Open, 100244.

Siriphokeaw, W., Senarat, S. and Donkamonkan, T. (2022). Comparison of internal assurance criteria to quality assurance criteria ASEAN University Network (Comparison of IQA and AUN-QA Assurance). Journal of Modern Learning Development, 7(7), 474-489.

The Commission on Higher Education Standards. (2022). Details of Learning Outcomes Based on the Higher Education Qualifications Framework Standard B.E. 2565 (2022). Retrieved 26 March 2025, from Edu: https://www.ops.go.th/th/e-book/edu-standard/item/6940-2022-07-22-02-54-49

United Nation Educational and Cultural. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals Learning Objectives. Retrieved 3 March 2025, from Unesdoc: https://unesdoc.unesco.org//ark:/48223 /pf0000247444

United Nation Educational and Cultural. (2023). Greening Education Partnership. Retrieved 3 March 2025, from Unesco: https://www.unesco.org/en/sustainable-development/education/greening-future

Yusof, R., Othman, N., Norwani, N. M., Ahmad, N. L. B. and Jalil, N. B. A. (2017). Implementation of outcome-based education (OBE) in accounting programme in higher education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 1186-1200.