The Effects of 4Ex2 Instructional Model Integrated with Higher-Order Questions on the Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability of Grade 11 Students

Main Article Content

Tarisara Radrongtai
Montri Thongmoon

Abstract

The purposes of this research were: (1) to develop 4Ex2 instructional model plans integrated with higher-order questioning to enhance the mathematical problem-solving ability and mathematics learning achievement of Grade 11 students with an efficiency criterion of 70/70; (2) to compare the mathematical problem-solving ability and mathematics learning achievement of Grade 11 students after receiving the 4Ex2 instructional model integrated with higher-order questioning with the 70 percent criterion; and (3) to compare the mathematical problem-solving ability and mathematics learning achievement of Grade 11 students before and after receiving the 4Ex2 instructional model integrated with higher-order questioning. The sample consisted of 30 grade 11 students from Class 11/1 of the 2024 academic year. The sample was collect using cluster random sampling from a random school in kadrang district, Mahasarakham. The research instruments included: (1) 4Ex2 instructional model plans integrated with higher-order questioning, (2) a mathematical problem-solving ability test, and (3) a mathematics achievement test. The data were analyzed using percentage, mean, standard deviation, one-sample t-test, and dependent samples t-test. The results revealed that the developed 4Ex2 instructional model integrated with higher-order questioning on arithmetic and geometric sequences achieved an efficiency of 80.27/71.52, which met the established criterion of 70/70. In addition, the students’ mathematical problem-solving ability and mathematics learning achievement after the implementation were significantly higher than the 70 percent criterion at the .05 level. Furthermore, the post-test scores of both mathematical problem-solving ability and mathematics learning achievement were significantly higher than the pre-test scores at the .05 level. These findings indicate that the 4Ex2 instructional model integrated with higher-order questioning is effective in enhancing mathematical problem-solving ability and mathematics learning achievement of Grade 11 students.

Article Details

How to Cite
Radrongtai, T., & Thongmoon, M. (2026). The Effects of 4Ex2 Instructional Model Integrated with Higher-Order Questions on the Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability of Grade 11 Students. Journal of Science and Science Education (JSSE), 9(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.14456/jsse.2026.05
Section
Research Articles in Science Education

References

Academic Naphopittayasan School. (2021). The Report O-Net Test for Mathematics of Mathayomsuksa 6 Students (in Thai). Maha Sarakham: Naphopittayasan School.

Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. (2006). BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.

Brandt, R. (1984). Teaching of thinking, for thinking, about thinking. Educational Leadership, 42(1), 3.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.

Kennedy, L. M. and Tipps, S. (1994). Guiding children’s learning of mathematics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Khammani, T. (2017). Teaching science: Knowledge for effective instructional model (21st ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.

Makhanong, A. (2010). Mathematical skills and processes: Development for learning development (in Thai). Bangkok: Textbook and Academic Document Center, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University.

Makhanong, A. (2014). Mathematics for secondary school teachers (in Thai). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.

Marshall, J. C. (2007). 4Ex2 Instructional Model: Promoting stronger teaching and deeper conceptual understanding. Paper presented at the School Science and Mathematics Association, Indianapolis, IN.

Marshall, J. C., Horton, B. and Smart, J. (2009). 4E×2 Instructional Model: Uniting three learning constructs to improve praxis in science and mathematics classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(6), 501-516.

Ministry of Education. (2017). Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E.2551, revised B.E. 2560 (in Thai). Bangkok: Printing House of the Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand printing House.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Virginia: NCTM, Inc.

Promwong, C. (2013). Efficiency testing of instructional media or instructional packages (E1/E2). Silpakorn Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 7–20.

Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Schmalz, R. S. (1973). Categorization of questions that mathematics teachers ask. Mathematics Teacher, 66(7), 616–629.

Srisaard, B. (2013). Fundamental Research (9th ed) (in Thai). Bangkok: Suweeriyasarn.

The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). (2012). Mathematical thinking process skills (3rd ed) (in Thai). Bangkok: S Charoen Printing.

Thipkong, S. (2001). Research on mathematics teaching and learning (in Thai). Bangkok: Department of Education, Faculty of Education, Kasetsart University.

Worakham, P. (2019). Education research (8th ed) (in Thai). Mahasarakham: Taksila.