Developing Mathematical Reasoning Skills on CER Framework of Grade 8 Students in Opportunity Expansion Schools through Mathematical Argumentation Activities on the Pythagorean Theorem

Main Article Content

Nitjarin Kutpun
Wanintorn Poonpaiboonpipat

Abstract

This study is action research aimed to 1) investigating approaches to developing mathematical reasoning skills on CER framework through mathematical argumentation-based learning activities, and
2) enhancing the mathematical reasoning skills on CER framework of Grade 8 students on the topic of
the Pythagorean Theorem. The participants consisted of 9 students from a small-sized opportunity expansion school. The research instruments included 1) 4 lesson plans, with one lesson plan implemented in each action research cycle, totaling 4 action research cycles 2) reflective journals on learning activity implementation 3) activity worksheets, and 4) an assessment of mathematical reasoning skills based on
the Claim–Evidence–Reasoning (CER) framework. Qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis of students’ worksheets and the mathematical reasoning assessment based on the CER framework, while descriptive statistics were used to analyze quantitative data. The findings of this research were as follows
1. The learning management approach for developing mathematical reasoning skills based on the CER framework through mathematical argumentation highlights important roles of both teachers and students. Key emphases include 1) teachers selecting open-ended problem situations or situations with multiple possible solutions, using language that students could easily understand before gradually extending to more complex problems. 2) teachers preparing students with the prerequisite knowledge and mathematical content necessary for mathematical reasoning. Consequently, foundational content was introduced during Action Cycles 1–2, while the concepts of the Pythagorean Theorem and its converse were emphasized in Action Cycles 3–4. and 3) teachers encouraging students to engage in analytical thinking, leading to
the presentation and refinement of claims relevant to the given situations, supported by appropriate reasoning, while enabling students to organize their mathematical thinking systematically and logically.
2. The results of the development of mathematical reasoning skills, based on the CER framework assessment, indicated that students achieved Level 3 in Claim (C), Level 3 in Evidence (E), and Level 2 in Reasoning (R). Overall, students’ mathematical reasoning skills in all CER components improved and reached Level 3. These findings demonstrate that the learning management approach implemented in the context of an opportunity expansion school was effective in developing students’ mathematical reasoning skills.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kutpun, N., & Poonpaiboonpipat, W. (2026). Developing Mathematical Reasoning Skills on CER Framework of Grade 8 Students in Opportunity Expansion Schools through Mathematical Argumentation Activities on the Pythagorean Theorem. Journal of Science and Science Education (JSSE), 9(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.14456/jsse.2026.11
Section
Research Articles in Science Education

References

Ball, D. L. and Bass, H. (2003). Making mathematics reasonable in school. In W. G. J. Kilpatrick, A research companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (pp. 27-44). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Baroody, A. J. (1998). Fostering Children's Mathematical Power: An Investigative Approach to K-8 Mathematics Instruction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Fosnot, C. T. (2005). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

Gravemeijer, K. and Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational studies in mathematics, 39(1), 111-129.

Hiebert, J. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

Jaroenphon, K. and Kitkuakul, S. (2023). Enhancing mathematical reasoning and communication abilities of Grade 6 students on triangles through mathematical argumentation-based learning (in Thai). Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi, 8(8), 187–202.

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J. and Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington: National Academies Press.

Kitkuekul, S. (2014). Science learning management: Directions for teachers in the 21st century (in Thai). Phetchabun: Juladis Printing.

Knudsen, J., Stevens, H. S., Lara-Meloy, T., Kim, H. J., Schechtman, N. and Shechtman, N. (2017). Mathematical Argumentation in Middle School-The What, Why, and How: A Step-by-Step Guide With Activities, Games, and Lesson Planning Tools. Corwin Press.

Lesh, R. A. and Doerr, H. M. (2003). Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

McNeill, K. L. and Krajcik, J. S. (2011). Supporting Grade 5-8 Students in Constructing Explanations in Science: The Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning Framework for Talk and Writing. Pearson.

Meechan, S. (2004). Rater Agreement Index (RAI) (in Thai). Journal of Education, Prince of Songkla University, 67-75.

Ministry of Education. (2017). Basic Education Core Curriculum 2008 (Revised Edition 2017) (in Thai). Bangkok: The Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand Printing House.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston.

National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organization). (2024). Ordinary National Educational Test (O-NET) results report for Grade 9, academic year 2024 (in Thai). Retrieved 21 May 2025, from niets: file:///C:/Users/asus/Downloads/Basic_Stat_BY_Grade_25

Niss, M. (2003). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The Danish KOM project. In A. Gagatsis and S. Papastavridis (Eds.). 3rd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematical Education (pp. 115-124). Athens: Hellenic Mathematical Society.

OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematics, financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Sema, P. and Thamsuan, J. (2017). Effects of organizing mathematics learning activities using inquiryco-operation model on mathematical reasoning and communication abilities of eighth grade students (in Thai). An Online Journal of Education, 12(4), 666-680.

Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A. and Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing Standards-Based Mathematics Instruction. Teachers College Press.

Stylianides, A. J. (2008). The role of conceptual analysis in teaching and learning proof. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2-8.

The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). (2017). Basic Education Core Curriculum: Mathematics Learning Area (Revised Edition B.E. 2560) (in Thai). Bangkok: Office of the Basic Education Commission.

The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (2022). Mathematical literacy framework (in Thai). Retrieved 23 May 2025, from pisathailand: https://pisathailand.ipst.ac.th/aboutpisa/mathematical_literacy_framework/

Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yackel, E. and Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for research in mathematics education, 27(4), 458-477.