A Comparative Study on Efficiency of Bluestar and Luminol Chemiluminescent Reagents in Bloodstain Detection on Single-ply and Two-ply Fabrics Laundered with Detergent.
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Currently, there are many crimes. A number of studies on crime scene investigations have been reported. This indicates a significant problem in Thai society, especially crimes involving life and property, such as assault cases, murder cases, robbery or robbery, etc. There must be a method for location analysis in case solving because the crime scene is considered the starting point of an offense. According to criminal statistics from the National Statistical Office, the rates of crime cases related to life, the body, and sex were found to increase from 2011–2022. Each case was complicated and became an unusual staged crime. In these cases, forensic science plays an important role in the investigation of offenders. Therefore, in this study, the effectiveness of the tested fluorescent chemicals, Bluestar and Luminol, for detecting blood stains on single-ply and two-ply towels washed with detergent was investigated. A drop of blood on single-ply and two-ply towels was prepared, and the samples were washed with washing powder and detergent after being left for 2 minutes before cleaning. The single-thread and double-thread towels were cleaned 10 times, each time 1 day apart. After 10 washes, the single-ply and two-ply towels were tested for luminescence reactions with Bluestar and Luminol via photocoagulation. Images of the fluorescence reactions of the Bluestar and Luminol chemicals were then recorded. The results showed that the Bluestar can detect bloodstains on single- and two-ply towels that are washed with washing powder and detergent more than Luminol. Moreover, Bluestar exhibits greater luminescence than Luminol does.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Published Manuscripts are the copyright of the Journal of the Justice System. However; the opinions that appeared in the content are the sole responsibility of the author.
References
Adair, T. W. (2006). Experimental detection of blood under painted surfaces. IABPA News,
-19.
Adair, T. W. (2006). Experimental detection of blood under painted surfaces. International
Association of Bloodstain Pattern Analysts News, 12-19.
Arkaraphon Aieorattanawadee(2015). A comparison of the luminol and Bluestar methods in
bloodstain detection. (Master of Science).Nakhon Pathom.Kasetsart University
BETZ, W. R., MAPOLDO, S. G., WACHOB, G. D., & FIRTH, M. C. (1989). Characterization
of carbon molecular sieves and activated charcoal for use in airborne contaminant
sampling. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 50(4), 181-187.
Chuena, L. W., & Eea, K. B. (2010). Forensic light sources for detection of biological evidences
in crime scene investigation: a review. Malaysian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1,
-28.
Cox, M. (1991). A study of the sensitivity and specificity of four presumptive tests for blood. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 36(5), 1503-1511.
Domala Sai Krishna, & Samuel, S. (2017). Development of Latent Blood Stain Using Luminol from Four Different Surfaces after Subjecting to Different Agents over Periods of Time. International Journal of Applied Biology and Forensics, 1, 2 68-71.
Jutamas Yimnoon.(2016).Detection of humen bloodstains on various types of shoe soles by the
methods of phrnolphthaleiin,luminol and fluorescein (Master of Science).
Nakhon Pathom. Silpakorn University.
Klasey D, & Levine, G. (1992). Using ultraviolet to enhance blood. Journal of Forensic
Identification, 42(5), 45-50.
Krishna, D. S., & Samuel, S. (2017). Development of Latent Blood Stain Using Luminol from Four
Different Surfaces after Subjecting to Different Agents over Periods of Time.
International Journal of Applied Biology and Forensics, 1, 268-271.
Luczak, S., Wozniak, M., Papuga, M., Stopiniska, K. and Sliwka, K. (2006) . A comparison of the
Bluestar and luminol effectiveness in bloodstain detection. Forensic Science
International, 56:239-245.
Sahs, P. T. (1992). DAB: an advancement in blood print detection. Journal of Forensic
Identification, 42(5), 412-420.
Sawarod Purimano.(2012).Detection of bloodstain by phenolphthalein test, tetramethylbenzidine
test , luminol test and BlueStar test. (Master of Science).Nakhon Pathom.
Silpakorn University.
Valentina, B., & Rahul, P. (2021). A comparison study of the detection of bloodstains on painted
and cleaned surfaces with luminol .Forensic Science International 75–82.
Waraporn Somburut.(2018).The interactions among the characteristics of variables that affect
luminol and BlueStar in detecting bloodstain. (Master of Science).Nakhon Pathom.
Silpakorn University.
Webb, J. L., Creamer, J. I., & Quickenden, T. I. (2006). A comparison of the presumptive luminol
test for blood with four non‐ chemiluminescent forensic techniques. Luminescence,
(4), 214-220.
Yuan, C. L., Xu, Z. Z., Fan, M. X., Liu, H. Y., Xie, Y. H., & Zhu, T. (2014). Study on characteristics and
harm of surfactants. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 6, 7: 2233-2237.