Factors Affecting the Choice of Alternative Justice Processes for People in Ratchaburi Province.

Main Article Content

Punchayaporn Sakprathompanit
Soratn Glubwila
Theeravut Ninphet

Abstract

The fact that Ratchaburi Province has little use of alternative justice processes will have an impact on Khao Bin Temporary Prison. Since the Khao Bin Temporary Prison can accommodate only less than 300 inmates, Ratchaburi Province is an area worth researching. And from reviewing the literature, it was found that no research has been found that studies what factors affect the choice of alternative justice processes by both parties.The objective of this research was 1) to study the perception and confidence in the alternative justice process, 2) to study the factors related to the decision to use the alternative justice process, and 3) to find ways to promote the alternative justice process in conflict management. Quantitative data was collected using questionnaires from 400 people in Ratchaburi Province. Qualitative data was collected using semi-structured interviews with 16 people involved in the alternative justice process and the mainstream justice process in Ratchaburi Province. Qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis, while quantitative data were analyzed using statistical methods such as mean, percentage, standard deviation, F-test, and Pearson correlation coefficient analysis. The findings revealed that 1) Most people did not receive information about the alternative justice process. In terms of confidence, it was found that most people believed that the alternative justice process was a faster process than the mainstream justice process. 2) The hypothesis testing found that (1) Different ages, educational levels, occupations and incomes have different choices of judicial procedures. (2) Factors of experience and perception related to the choice of the alternative justice process. 3) The guidelines for promoting the alternative justice process in conflict management should focus on publicizing the alternative justice process to increase public awareness. Emphasize the importance of emphasizing the advantages and benefits that people will receive from choosing alternative justice processes.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sakprathompanit, P., Glubwila, S. ., & Ninphet, T. . (2025). Factors Affecting the Choice of Alternative Justice Processes for People in Ratchaburi Province. Journal of Thai Justice System, 18(3), 123–144. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JTJS/article/view/278299
Section
Research Articles

References

Akkakorn Chaiyapong, Vachiravitch Ittithanasuphavitch, Chotiga Polrak and Niramol Yindee. (2018). THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY JUSTICE OF NONGKO SUB-DISTRICT, KRANUAN DISTRICT, KHONKAEN PROVINCE. SUTHIPARI, 32(103), 203–216.

Department of Corrections. (2021). Report on the overcrowding of prisoners in prisons/correctional institutions, Zone 7. http://www.correct.go.th/rt103pdf/crowded_pdf.php?filename=2024_2024-12-05

Jirasak Bangtamai and Siriphat Lapchit. (2021). Factor of Success the Operation of Prathabu Sub-District Community Justice Center. Journal of Legal Administration and Local Innovation, 7(8), 293–308.

Kamonchanok Kongcharoen. (2023). Acceptance of restorative justice process to manage community conflicts in Chachoengsao Province Academic. Journal of Buriram Rajabhat University, Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(2), 17–44.

MGR Online. (2023). Summary of the results of the 6-month work of the Dispute Mediation Center: 562 cases successfully mediated, reducing the number of cases to court and saving the government budget. https://mgronline.com/crime/detail/9660000062404

Ministry of Justice. (2007). Restorative justice process. The Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand.

Ministry of Justice. (2020). Announcement of the Ministry of Justice on the establishment of provincial groups and the determination of responsibilities of provinces that are provincial operation centers, B.E. 2563. https://km.moj.go.th/index.php/palace/blog-detail?id=430&view=1

Nattapong Phttamaroj and Suvicha Pouaree. (2015). Social Capital in Restorative Justice:Case Study of Phanom Sarakham CommunityJustice Centre. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University, 8(2), 392–407.

Office of the Judiciary. (2023). Annual Case Statistics Report Book 2021. https://opendata.coj.go.th/dataset/stat_case_64

Parichat Chokkerd. (2021). Thailand ranks in the top 10 for prison overcrowding. https://brandinside.asia/most-prisoners-world-top-10-ranking-in-2021/

Phongthon Tanyasiri. (2021). Knowledge and Understanding of People on the Role of Community Justice enter to Strengthen Reconciliation and Peaceful Culture for Provincial Justice Offices’ Pilot, the Ministry of Justice. Journal of Public Administration and Politics, 10(2), 126–146.

Ratchaburi Provincial Justice Office. (2021). Agency information. https://ratchaburi.moj.go.th/news/434.

Sanyapong Limprasert, SujinSanapath Rapeeporn, Saisa-Nguanand and Wasin Usanno. (2019). Community Justice: An Alternative Justice Process in Thai Society. RSU National Research Conference 2019. 1461–1474.

Surachai (Fu-Add) Vaivanjit, Suraiya Nire, Muhammad Raphir Makin, Mahamadari Vano, Mahamadari Vano and Chokchai Supapinyo. (2016). Community justice process reform in the southernmost provinces. [Research report]. King Prajadhipok's Institute.

Tai Wattana. (2021). Alternative justice processes in foreign countries towards a model for solving the problems of the Thai justice process. https://researchcafe.tsri.or.th/judicial-process/

V-Reformer. (2013). Alternative Justice Process, Alternative Justice, Part 1. http://v-reform.org/v-report/alternative-dispute-resolution-1-principle/