The Importance of Forensic Anthropological Photography: From Unidentified Bodies to Skeletal Reconstruction

Main Article Content

Ratthakan Panmarasri

Abstract

            Forensic anthropological imaging is a fundamental component in personalidentification, skeletal analysis, and the use of forensic evidence in the justice system. Despite the existence of internationalguidelines, there remains a lack of a systematic standard framework that can comprehensively link image accuracy,digital data integrity, traceability, and acceptance in court. This study aims to review the role of forensic anthropological imaging, analyze specialized standardsapplied internationally, and compare them with the context of Thailand. An integrative literature review was conducted based on relevant international standards, including ISO 21043, SWGIT, FOROST, FIRS, and ANZPAA. The findings indicate that Thailandstill lacks a national specialized standard for forensic anthropological imaging. This gap results in variability in image quality,digital evidence integrity, and traceability, which may affect the reliability of forensic evidence in judicial proceedings. This article proposes the Thai Forensic Anthropological Imaging Standard (TFAIS) as a nationalframework to systematically enhanceimaging practices, digital data management,and the maintenance of chain-of-custody. In conclusion, TFAIS has the potential to reduce data variability, improve the accuracyand verifiability of forensic imaging evidence,and bridge scientific practice with courtroomacceptance, thereby strengtheningevidence-based justice.

Article Details

How to Cite
Panmarasri, R. (2026). The Importance of Forensic Anthropological Photography: From Unidentified Bodies to Skeletal Reconstruction. Journal of Thai Justice System, 19(2), 129–154. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JTJS/article/view/285230
Section
Academic Articles

References

Australia New Zealand Policing Advisory Agency. (2020). Guidelines for forensic anthropology practitioners. ANZPAA National Institute of Forensic Science.

Blau, S. & Ubelaker, D. H. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315528939

Byers, S. N. (2016). Introduction to forensic anthropology (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642031

Forensic Investigation Research Station.(2022). Technical manual 8: Skeletal photography (2nd ed.). Colorado Mesa University. https://www.coloradomesa.edu/forensic-investigation-research-station/firs-tm8-skeletal-photography-2nd-edition.pdf

Forensic Osteology Research Station. (2013). Cranium and mandible imaging protocol: A guide for publication-quality digital photography of the skull (FOROST Occasional Publications No. 2). https://forost.org/Forost_Citation/FOROST_Skull_Photo_Protocol.pdf

Forensic Science Regulator. (2021). Codes of practice and conduct for forensic science providers and practitioners in the criminal justice system (Issue 7). GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/forensic-science-providers-codes-of-practice-and-conduct-2021-issue-7

Healy, M. G. (2024). Perspective distortion tolerances and skull–face registration in craniofacial superimposition. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 69(1), e1–e10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15538

International Criminal Police Organization. (2018). Disaster victim identification: Good practice manual.

International Organization for Standardization. (2018a). ISO 21043-1:2018 Forensic sciences—Part 1: Terms and definitions.

International Organization for Standardization. (2018b). ISO 21043-2:2018 Forensic sciences—Part 2: Recognition, recording, collecting, transport and storage of items.

International Organization for Standardization. (2018c). ISO 21043-3:2018 Forensic sciences—Part 3: Analysis.

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2020). Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science (OSAC) registry. https://www.nist.gov/osac

Panmarasri, R. (2024). Postmortem identification using facial morphological characteristics in forensic photography: A case study of the HTMS Sukhothai shipwreck in the Gulf of Thailand. Journal of Criminology and Forensic Science, 9(2), 182–200. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/forensic/article/view/266753

Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence. (2020). SWGDE best practices for digital evidence. https://www.swgde.org/documents

Scientific Working Group on Imaging Technology. (2013). Best practices for forensic imaging. https://theiai.org/docs/SWGIT_Guidelines.pdf

Ubelaker, D. H. (2018). Forensic anthropology: Current state and future directions. Forensic Sciences Research, 3(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2018.1503523

White, T. D., Black, M. T., & Folkens, P. A. (2012). Human osteology (3rd ed.). Academic Press.