Critical Consciousness Development through Teaching English Reading: A Context of EFL Students in Thailand’s Northeastern Area

Main Article Content

Thidawan Wichanee
Saneh Thongrin

Abstract

EFL reading in non-English environments often expose students to texts from different cultures. However, reading comprehension alone is inadequate to prepare the students to be critical readers, due to different sociocultural and sociopolitical factors that affect interpretations of EFL students who should be prepared with critical perspectives to read more meaningfully and to be able to demonstrate a desire to challenge and transform perceived socio-political inequities and oppressive structures. This study aimed to investigate the extent of enhanced reading ability and to develop critical consciousness by using critical dialogue-oriented reading instruction. The participants were 30 students majoring in English at a university located in Northeastern part of Thailand. The data were collected by using a self-evaluation questionnaire, reading comprehension pretest and posttest, field notes, students’ reflective journals, and interview transcripts. The findings show an increase of the participants’ reading comprehension abilities, moving beyond the lexical comprehension level, and being able to perform critical literacy through reading to writing practice. Also, their developed critical consciousness was manifested through their awareness of social relations and power, their reflections on ongoing circumstances and living systems, and their action against injustice. The findings suggest aspects of critical literacies that challenge normative practices of reading instructions implemented in hegemonic spheres.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wichanee, T., & Thongrin, S. (2024). Critical Consciousness Development through Teaching English Reading: A Context of EFL Students in Thailand’s Northeastern Area. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 440–466. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/270408
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Thidawan Wichanee, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Thammasat University

A Ph.D. candidate in the English Language Studies program at Thammasat University. Her research interests focus on Language and Identity, English Language Teaching, and Critical Literacy.

Saneh Thongrin, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Thammasat University

An Associate Professor in the department of English, Liberal Arts, Thammasat University. Her works have been published in LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, The Asian EFL Journal, an English Language Education Series, Springer, and a Routledge Research in Higher Education series.

References

Alexanders, S. T., & McCargo, D. (2014). Diglossia and identity in Northeast Thailand: Linguistic, social, and political hierarchy. Journal

of Sociolinguistics, 18(1), 60-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12064

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of

educational objectives (Completed.). Longman.

Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307

Brown, A. L., & Perry, D. (2011). First impressions: Developing critical consciousness in counselor training programs. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 23(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2011.548699

Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Maguire, P. (2003). Why action research? Action Research, 1, 9-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503030011002

Cacay, A. D. (2022). Effectiveness of peer assessment as teaching innovation: A classroom-based action research. Puissant, 3, 465-473. https://nbbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-78589-2

Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. Qualitative report, 21(5), 811-831. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2337

Cooney, A., Darcy, E., & Casey, D. (2018). Integrating reading and writing: Supporting students’ writing from source. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 15(5), 3. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.15.5.3

Creswell, J. W. (2011). Controversies in mixed-methods research. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4(1), 269-284.

https://sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/40426

Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., Plano Clark, V. L., & Smith, K. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e566732013-001

Cui, R., & Teo, P. (2023). Dialogic instruction in a Chinese EFL classroom: A practitioner perspective. TESOL Quarterly. 57(2). 1-24. https://dot.org/10.1002/tesq3215

Dolba, S. Q., Gula, L. P., & Nunez, J. (2022). Reading teachers: Reading strategies employed in teaching reading in grade school. Journal of

Language and Literature Studies, 2(2), 62-74. https://doi.org/10.36312/jools.v2i2.874

Farias, P. F., & da Silva, L. (2021). Doing critical language teaching through tasks: Insights from the Brazilian context. Education Sciences, 11(5),

https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050223

Freire, P. (1970). Cultural action and conscientization. Harvard Educational Review, 40(3), 452-477. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.40.3.h76250x720j43175

Freire, P. (2002). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.

Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (2005). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Routledge.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. Pearson.

Gebhard, J. G. (2005). Awareness of teaching through action research: Examples, benefits, limitations. JALT Journal, 27(1), 53-69

https://doi.org/10.37546/jaltjj27.1-3

Godfrey, E. B., & Grayman, J. K. (2014). Teaching citizens: The role of open classroom climate in fostering critical consciousness among youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(11), 1801–1817. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10964-013-0084-5

Huang, S. Y. (2011). Reading further and beyond the text: Student perspectives of critical literacy in EFL reading and writing. Journal of

Adolescent Adult Literacy, 55(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.007

Kaithong, B., & Sawangdee, Y. (2018). Transforming roles and functions of women in the Northeast region of Thailand. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 11(29), 27-41. https://journal.nu.ac.th/JCDR/article/view/1919

Katz, J. (2001). Analytic induction. In N. J. Smelser & B. Baltes. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences.

(pp. 480-484). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076/00774-9

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (Eds). Deakin University Press.

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). Critical theory and participatory action research. Springer.

Ko, M. Y. (2013). Critical literacy practices in the EFL context and the English language proficiency: Further exploration. English Language

Teaching, 6(11), 17-28. https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n11p17

Larking, M. (2017). Critical reading strategies in the advanced English classroom. APU Journal of Language Research, 2(1), 50-68. https://doi.org/10.34409.apujlr.20_50

Lewison, M., Flint, A. S., & Van Sluys, K. (2002). Taking on critical literacy: The journey of newcomers and novices. Language arts, 79(5), 382-

https://www.jstor.org/stable/41483258

Lewison, M., Leland, C., & Hartse, J. (2015). Creating critical classrooms: Reading and writing with an edge. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203826317

Liu, Y. (2017). Critical literacy practices in EFL reading classroom: An experimental study towards Chinese university students. English

Language Teaching, 10(5), 133-138. https: //doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n5p133

McLaughlin, M., & DeVoogd, G. (2004). Critical literacy as comprehension: Expanding reader response. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,

(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.10598/JAAL.48.1.5

McLaren, P. (2005). Capitalists and conquerors: A critical pedagogy against empire. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaäna, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE.

Ndura, E. (2004). ESL and cultural bias: An analysis of elementary through high school textbooks in the Western United States. Language,

Culture, and Curriculum, 17(2), 143-153. https: // doi.org/10.1080/0790831048666680

Olcoń, K., Gilbert, D. J., & Pulliam, R. M. (2020). Teaching about racial and ethnic diversity in social work education: A systematic review.

Journal of social work education, 56(2), 215-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2019.1656578

Oranpattanachai, P. (2023). Relationship between the reading strategy, reading self-efficacy, and reading comprehension of Thai EFL

students. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(1),194-220. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/26343

Pensiri, A., & Adunyarittigun, D. (2019). Behind the scores: In search of the predictive validity of O-NET scores to academic achievements of

English major students. Journal of Studies in the English Language, 14(2), 17-48. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsel/article/view/203708

Petchkam. S. (2018). Local history: Sakon Nakhon. Wanida Press. Pongpanit, A. (2013). It gets better.: Transgenderism/transsexualism and

Thai Theravada Buddhist beliefs in Thai cinema. Humanities Journal. 20(2), 111-142. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/abc/article/view/53611

Ragusa, G. (2013). Science literacy and text book biases. In 2013 ASEE annual conference & exposition proceedings. Publication No. 1508, (pp. 23-1055). https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22440

Ross, A., & Willson, V. L. (2018). Basic and advanced statistical tests: Writing results sections and creating tables and figures. Springer.

Rumelhart, D. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. Brewer (Eds)., Theoretical issues in reading

comprehension (pp. 33-58). Erlbaum Associates.

Rungwaraphong, P. (2018). Framework for dialogic teaching in English reading class: A practice guide for university lecturers. Journal of

Humanities Naresuan University, 15(2), 59-76. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jhnu/article/view/169370/121860

Schneider, M. P. (2019). Critical consciousness of educators: The development and psychometric validation of a measure using Structural Equation Modeling. (Publication No. 1616). [Doctoral dissertation. University of Denver]. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/1616

Shimbo, A., & Tendo, M. (2022). Creating cultural resources and reading: A case study of a public library and invisible parental pedagogy in

Tokyo. International Journal of Educational Research, 113, Article 101970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101970

Shin, H., & Crookes, G. (2005). Exploring the possibilities for EFL critical pedagogy in Korea: A two-part case studies. Critical Inquiry in

Language Studies: An International Journal, 2(2), 113- 136. https:// doi.org/10.1207/s1542759cils0202_3

Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education. Greenwood Publishing Group.

Slavin, R. (2007). Educational Research in an age of accountability. Pearson Education.

Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency.

Research Reading Quarterly, 16(1), 32-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/747348

Thongtow. P., & Limprawat, S. (2020). The roles of beliefs about the spirit to Isan society: A case study of Ubonratchatani. Journal of Liberal

Arts, Rangsit University, 15(2), 221-236. https://rsujournal.rsu.ac.th/index.php/jla/srticle/view/1565

Tierney, R. J., & P. D. Pearson. (1994). Learning to learn from a text: A Framework for Improving Classroom Practice. In R. Ruddell,

M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, (pp. 496-513). International Reading Association.

Tolongtong, N., & Adunyarittigun, D. (2020). The reciprocal teaching procedure: An alternative reading instruction that works. Journal of

Studies in the English Language, 15(2), 27-62. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsel/article/view/239870

Turner, R. C., & Carlson, L. (2003). Indexes of item-objective congruence for multidimensional items. International journal of testing, 3(2), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0302_5

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.

Yulianto, S. W. (2015). Critical pedagogy principles in teaching EFL reading. English Review: Journal of English Education, 4(1), 25-38.

https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v4i1.305