Towards A Taxonomical Structure of Book Reviews in Applied Linguistics: A Move Analysis

Main Article Content

Sirisuda Siripukdi

Abstract

Practice in writing book reviews (BRs) is considered beneficial for graduate students as it helps them develop academic argumentation skills prior to writing their dissertations. Taxonomical differences in BRs exist across disciplines, particularly in their generic and rhetorical structures. As part of a material development initiative in Applied Linguistics, this paper analyses BRs published in the RELC Journal between 2015 and 2020 to establish their taxonomical structures. A total of 32 book reviews were examined, and both their generic and rhetorical structures were analysed using Swales’s (1990) move analysis approach and the framework proposed by Gezegin (2015). The communicative functions of each move were also identified to enhance students’ genre awareness. The analysis revealed four dominant generic structures and their associated rhetorical moves: introducing the book (General topic^, Author(s)^, Readership^, Book insertion^), outlining the book (Organisation^, Topics^, Extra text material^), highlighting parts of the book (Focused evaluation^), and providing a closing evaluation (Recommendation^). Furthermore, the analysis identified four distinct compositional approaches employed by BR writers, generating novel insights and offering pedagogical benefits for second-language writing instruction.

Article Details

How to Cite
Siripukdi, S. (2026). Towards A Taxonomical Structure of Book Reviews in Applied Linguistics: A Move Analysis. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 19(1), 503–524. https://doi.org/10.70730/VFEW9512
Section
Research Articles

References

Akbarian, I. (2019). Second language research: Methodology and design. RELC Journal, 50(2), 358-361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217707630

Ansary, H., & Babaii, E. (2005). The generic integrity of newspaper editorials: A systemic functional perspective. RELC Journal, 36(3), 271-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688205060051

Banegas, D. (2014). Book review: Teacher research in language teaching: A critical analysis. RELC Journal, 46(1), 105-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214555355

Banegas, D. L. (2016). Book review: International perspectives on teacher research. RELC Journal, 47(1), 115-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688215619519

Bhatia, V. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. Continuum International.

Bondi, M. (2009). Historians at work: Reporting frameworks in English and Italian book review articles. In K. Hyland & G. Diani, Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings (pp. 179-196). Palgrave MacMillan.

Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., & Spinks, S. (2012). Using functional grammar: An explorer’s guide (3rd ed.). National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.

Damrongmanee, M., & Rojanaatichartasakul, S. (2023). How do art critics critique? A move analysis of art reviews written by professional writers. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(2), 40-60. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/266932

De-Carvalho, G. (2001). Rhetorical patterns of academic book reviews written in Portuguese and in English. In the 2nd International Linguistics Conference (pp. 261-268). Universidad do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.

Diani, G. (2009). Reporting and evaluation in English book review articles: A cross-disciplinary study. In K. Hyland & G. Diani, Academic Evaluation: Review genres in university settings (pp. 87-105). Palgrave Macmillan.

Duman, G., Orhon, G., & Gedik, N. (2015). Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012. ReCALL, 27(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000287

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Pinter Pub Ltd..

England, N. (2015). Book review: The developing language learner: An introduction to exploratory practice. RELC Journal, 46(2), 207-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688215585572

Fung, K. S. C. (2019). Book review: Teaching in low-resource classrooms: Voices of experience. RELC Journal, 50(3), 499-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218771382

Gea-Valor, M. (2000). A pragmatic approach to politeness and modality in book review articles. Universidad de València.

Gezegin, B. (2015). Book review genre in academic writing: A comparative study of English and Turkish across ten disciplines [Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University].

Giannoni, D. (2002). Hard words, soft technology. Criticism and endorsement in the software review genre. In M. Gotti, D. Heller & M. Dossena, Conflict and negotiation in specialized texts (pp. 335-363). Peter Lang.

Graham, K. M. (2019). Book review: English-medium instruction in Chinese universities: Perspectives, discourse, and evaluation. RELC Journal, 50(3), 501-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368821876030

Haas, C. (1994). Learning to read biology: One student’s rhetorical development in college. Written Communication, 11(1), 43-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088394011001004

Hall, S. J. (2016). Book review: Motivation in the language classroom. RELC Journal, 47(2), 269-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216651

Halliday, M. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.

Hammond, J., & Macken-Horarik, M. (1999). Critical literacy: Challenges and questions for ESL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 528-544. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587678

Hartley, J. (2006). Academic writing and publishing: A practical handbook. Routledge.

Holliday, A. (2015). Qualitative research and analysis. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti, Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 49-62). Bloomsbury Academic.

Hyland, K. (2000). Praise and criticism: Interactions in book reviews. In K. Hyland, Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing (pp. 41-62). Longman.

Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse. Continuum.

Hyland, K., & Diani, G. (2009). Introduction: Academic evaluation and review genres. In K. Hyland & G. Diani, Academic Evaluation. Review Genres in University Settings (pp. 1-14). Palgrave Macmillan.

Khezrlou, S. (2015). Book review: Innovations in learning technologies for English language teaching. RELC Journal, 46(2), 205-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214562798

Kohnke, L. (2015). Book review: Extensive reading: The role of motivation. RELC Journal, 55(1), 246-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211038784

Kongpetch, S. (2003). The Implications of the genre-based approach to the teaching of English writing at the apartment of Foreign Language, Khon Kaen University in North-Eastern Thailand [Doctoral dissertation, University of Technology Sydney]. http://hdl.handle.net/10453/20056

Kongpetch, S. (2006). Using a genre-based approach to teach writing to Thai students: A case study. Prospect, 21, 3-33.

Lee, D. (2001). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Oxford University Press.

Lewis, M. (2018). Book review: Reflecting on critical incidents in language education: 40 dilemmas for novice TESOL professionals. RELC Journal, 49(2), 262-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218768108

Lewis, M. (2020). Book review: Words that go ‘Ping’: The ridiculously wonderful world of onomatopoeia, Barbara Lasserre. Sydney: Allen and Unwin 2018. pp. 197. RELC Journal, 51(3), 456-457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219840127

Mah, A. S. H. (2015). Book review: Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. RELC Journal, 46(2), 208-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688215585670

Martin, J. (1984). Language, register and genre. In F. Christie, Children writing: A reader (pp. 21-30). Deakin University Press.

Martin, J. (1992). English text: System and structure. John Benjamins.

Martin, J. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics And Education, 20(1), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.003

Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Equinox Pub.

Moreno, A., & Suárez, L. (2008). A framework for comparing evaluation resources across academic texts. Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 28(6), 749-769. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2008.038

Motta-Roth, D. (1995). Rhetorical features and disciplinary cultures: A genre-based study of academic book reviews in linguistics, chemistry, and economics [Doctoral dissertation, Federal University of Santa Catarina].

Motta-Roth, D. (2001). The social construction of genre by academic reviews. Trabalhos Em Linguística Aplicada, 38, 29-45. https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/tla/article/view/8639332

Paltridge, B. (2014). Genre and second-language academic writing. Language Teaching, 47(3), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000068

Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2024). Change and stability in thesis and dissertation writing: The evolution of an academic genre. Bloomsbury.

Payaprom, S. (2012). The impact of a genre-based approach on English language teaching in an EFL tertiary context in Thailand [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wollongong].

Phakiti, A., & Li, L. (2011). General academic difficulties and reading and writing difficulties among Asian ESL postgraduate students in TESOL at an Australian university. RELC Journal, 42(3), 227-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688211421417

Rose, D. (2012). Genre in the Sydney school. In J. Gee & M. Handford, The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 209-225). Routledge.

Rose, D., & Martin, J. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn. Equinox Publishing.

Scopus. (2021). Scopus content. Scopus.com. Retrieved 6 January 2022, from https://www.scopus.com

Shirazizadeh, M. (2019). Practical corpus linguistics: An introduction to corpus-based language analysis. RELC Journal, 50(2), 361-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217707631

Steele, G. S. (2018). Book review: Materials evaluation and design for language teaching, Second Edition. RELC Journal, 49(3), 402-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217701954

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J.M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge University Press

Sykes, A. H. (2017). Book review: Corpus linguistics for ELT: Research and practice. RELC Journal, 48(1), 159-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216661252

Tse, P., & Hyland, K. (2009). Discipline and gender: Constructing rhetorical identity in book reviews. In K. Hyland & G. Diani, Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings (pp. 105-121). Palgrave Macmillan.

Walker, C. (2019). Classroom dynamics – Kindle Edition. RELC Journal, 50(1), 210-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217730146

Wang, H. (2015). Book review: Global identity in multicultural and international educational contexts: Student identity formation in international schools. RELC Journal, 46(3), 327-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688215609232

Wang, Y. F., & Tsai, P. H. (2007). Textual and contextual contrast connection: A study of Chinese contrastive markers across different text types. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(10), 1775-1815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.011

Watanabe, H. (2017). An examination of written genres in English language textbooks in Japan. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 14(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2017.14.1.5.64

Yeo, M. (2016). Book review: Educating second language teachers. RELC Journal, 47(1), 119-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216639762

Yeo, M. A., Renandya, W. A., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2022). Re-envisioning academic publication: From “publish or perish” to “publish and flourish”. RELC Journal, 53(1), 266-275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220979092