Learning and learning-to-learn by doing: An experiential learning approach for integrating human factors into maritime design education

  • Apsara Abeysiriwardhane Australian Maritime College, an Institute of the University of Tasmania, Australia
  • Margareta Lützhöft Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway
  • Samrat Ghosh Australian Maritime College, an Institute of the University of Tasmania, Australia
Keywords: Human factors, Human centred design, Maritime design education, Experiential learning, Active learning, Ship design

Abstract

This paper presents the findings of a study conducted to integrate Human Factors (HF) and Human Centered Design (HCD) knowledge into maritime design students’ educational platform and to motivate them to utilize this knowledge in their designs. Naval architecture students at the Australian Maritime College (AMC) were the participants in this study. Firstly, a classroom survey was conducted to determine the students’ current level of awareness and understanding of maritime HF and HCD. Then, an onboard survey was conducted after 5 HF-related activities during a 7-day voyage onboard the research vessel of AMC, MV Bluefin. The onboard activities provided the students with an opportunity to experience experiential learning, including all its key elements, based on Kolb’s experiential learning model. The findings prove experiential learning is a “paradigm of noteworthy learning” that supports multiple learning objectives of learners and shapes their knowledge through experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abeysiriwardhane, A., Lützhöft, M., & Petersen, E. S. (2017). Human centered design knowledge for maritime designers; Enough preaching, time to practice. National Maritime Intelligence-Integration Office (NMIO) - Technical Bulletin, 12. Retrieved from http://nmio.ise.gov/Media/techbulletin

Abeysiriwardhane, A., Lützhöft, M., Petersen, E. S., & Enshaei, H. (2016). Incorporate good practice into ship design process; Future ship designers meet end users. In Proceedings of the ERGOSHIP 2016. Melbourne, Australia.

Abeysiriwardhane, A., Lützhöft, M., Petersen, E. S., & Enshaei, H. (2017). Human centred design knowledge into maritime engineering education; Theoretical framework. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2), 49-60. doi:10.1080/22054952.2017.1287038

Babu, A., Arulanand, N., & Chandran, V. (2020). Skill development through experiential learning: A case study for product development scenario. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 16-21. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.002the

Bakr, M. H. (2015). Teaching electronics for non electrical engineers using blended learning and experiential learning. In Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association Conference. McMaster University. doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.5725

Berg, B., & Lune, H. (2012). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 8 ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Christie, M., & de Graaff, E. (2017). The philosophical and pedagogical underpinnings of active learning in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(1), 5-16. doi:10.1080/03043797.2016.1254160

Costa, N., & Lützhöft, M. (2014). The values of ergonomics in ship design and operation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors in Ship Design and Operation. Royal Institute of Naval Architects, London, UK.

CyClaDes. (2014). Crew centred design and operation of ships and ship systems. Retrieved from http://www.cyclades-project.eu/CyClaDes/index.xhtml

Dewey, J. (2012). Experience and nature. 2 ed. USA: Dover Publications.

Dobie, T. G. (2003). Critical significance of human factors in ship design. In Proceedings of the Research Vessel Operators Committee Meeting. University of Minnesota.

Efron, S. E., & Ravid, R. (2020). Action research in education: A practical guide. 2 ed. Guilford Publications.

Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Philadelphia: McGraw-Hill Education.

Ellis, N. (2009). Vessel design and the well-being of seafarers. In Proceedings of the Seafarers International Research Centre Symposium, Cardiff, UK.

Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco, California, USA: Jossey-Bass.

Fink, L. D., & Fink, A. K. (2009). Designing courses for significant learning: Voices of experience: New directions for teaching and learning. San Francisco, California, USA: Jossey-Bass.

Gautam, S., Nagarajan, K., Loh, K. C., Zhou, K., Yung, L. L. Y., Tong, Y. W., & Li, Z. (2020). Hands-on learning: An experiential approach to train chemical engineering students. Chemical Engineering Education, 5(2), 72-82.

Ghrayeb, O., & Vohra, P. (2011). Experiential learning in engineering education: A case study at NIU. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 13, 82-89.

Girvan, C., Conneely, C., & Tangney, B. (2016). Extending experiential learning in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 129-139. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.04.009

Greene, J. R. (1992). Experience-based learning in electrical and electronic engineering: An effective and affordable approach. In Proceedings of the 3D Africon Conference. Ezulwini Valley, Swaziland.

Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Guerra, A. (2015). Problem-based learning and sustainable engineering education. (Doctor of Philosophy). Aalborg University, Denmark.

Haynes, C. (2007). Experiential learning: Learning by doing. Retrieved from http://news.uchicago.edu/article/2015/04/29/learning-doing-helps-students-perform-better-science

Hemmen, H. F. V. (2008). The need for additional human factors considerations in ship operations. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Ship Operations, Management and Economics. Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Athens, Greece.

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1987). The action research planner. 3 ed. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.

Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. London, United Kingdom: Pearson Education.

Konak, A., Clark, T. K., & Nasereddin, M. (2014). Using Kolb’s experiential learning cycle to improve student learning in virtual computer laboratories. Computers and Education, 72, 11-22. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.013

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. 4 ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Lam, G., Gill, N., & Ghaemi, R. (2019). Semi-structured design and problem-based experiential learning in a first-year biomedical engineering laboratory course. In Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association Conference. Ottawa (Ontario), Canada.

Lawson, H. A., Caringi, J., Pyles, L., Jurkowski, J., & Bozlak, C. (2015). Participatory action research: Pocket guide to social work research methods. Oxford University Press.

Lützhöft, M., Petersen, E. S., & Abeysiriwardhane, A. (2017). The psychology of ship architecture and design. In MacLachlan, M. (Ed.). Maritime psychology: Research in organisational and health behavior at sea. 1 ed. Switzerland: Springer.

Mallam, S. (2016). Distributed participatory design in multidisciplinary engineering projects: Investigating a sustainable approach for ship design and construction. (Doctor of Philosophy). Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden.

Matsangas, P., & Shattuck, N. L. (2020). Habitability in berthing compartments and well-being of sailors working on U.S. Navy surface ships. Human Factors, 1, 1-12. doi: 10.1177/0018720820906050

Mertler, C. A. (2016). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators. SAGE Publications.

Mitchell, M., & Jolley, J. (2012). Research design explained. Cengage Learning.

Moon, J. A. (2013). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. Albingdon, Oxon: Routledge Falmer.

Perkins, D. N. (1991). What constructivism demands of the learner? Educational Technology, 31(9), 19-21.

Petersen, E. S. (2010). User centred design methods must also be user centred: A single voice from the field. (Master of Philosophy). Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Petersen, E. S. (2012). Engineering usability. (Doctor of Philosophy). Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Petersen, E. S., Nyce, J. M., & Lützhöft, M. (2011). Ethnography re-engineered: The two tribes problem. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 12(6), 496-509. doi:10.1080/1463922X.2010.504284

Piaget, J. (1969). The intellectual development of the adolescent. In Caplan, G., & Lebovici, S. (Eds.). Adolescence: Psychosocial perspectives. New York: Barre Books.

Piaget, J. (2013). The principles of genetic epistemology. 7 ed. New York: Routledge Publishers.

Rasmussen, J. (2005). Designing usable ship. In Proceedings of the Human Factors in Ship Design, Safety and Operation. Royal Institute of Naval Architects, London, UK.

Rumawas, V. (2016). Human factors in ship design and operation: Experiential learning. (Doctor of Philosophy). Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.

Stevenson, J. M., Buchanan, D. A., Druckrey, M., McClinton, J., & Wilson-Stevenson, K. (2020). Heart and soul: Higher education action research techniques and strategies of University leadership. Academica Press.

Tejedor, G., Segalàs, J., & Rosas-Casals, M. (2018). Transdisciplinarity in higher education for sustainability: How discourses are approached in engineering education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 29-37.

The Nautical Institute. (2015). Improving ship operational design. 2 ed. London, UK: The Nautical Institute.

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(3), 398-405. doi:10.1111/nhs.12048

Vries, L. D., Hogström, P., Costa, N. A., & Mallam, S. (2017). Designing for safe operations: Promoting a human-centred approach to complex vessel design. Ships and Offshore Structure, 12(8), 1016-1023. doi:10.1080/17445302.2017.1302637

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34-41.

Walker, O. (2011). The human element competency required for design appraisal. In Proceedings of the Human Factors in Ship Design and Operation. Royal Institute of Naval Architects, London, UK.

Wankat, P., & Oreovicz, F. (2015). Teaching engineering. West Lafayette, Indiana, USA: Purdue University Press.

Wiggins, S. (2017). Discursive psychology: Theory, method and applications: SAGE Publications.

Zhan, W., Porter, J. R., & Morgan, J. A. (2013). Experiential learning of digital communication using LabVIEW. IEEE Transactions on Education 57(1), 34-41. doi:10.1109/TE.2013.2264059

Published
2020-07-16
How to Cite
Abeysiriwardhane, A., Lützhöft, M., & Ghosh, S. (2020). Learning and learning-to-learn by doing: An experiential learning approach for integrating human factors into maritime design education. Maritime Technology and Research, 3(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2021.241912