Assessing the impact of emission control areas policy on ship emissions in the Gulf of Thailand using AIS data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2025.275311Keywords:
Ship emission; Emission Control Areas; Automatic Identification System data; Gulf of ThailandAbstract
The rising concern over ship emissions has prompted the exploration of Emission Control Areas (ECAs) in various regions. This study provides a comparative analysis of ship emissions in non-ECA areas and offers insights for implementing ECA policies in the Gulf of Thailand. Utilizing Automatic Identification System (AIS) data from January 1 to 31, 2023, this study models ship emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and particulate matter (PM). Spatial analysis reveals critical emission hotspots associated with ship density, port locations, and major shipping lanes, identifying oil tankers as primary emitters. A comparative analysis with existing ECAs demonstrates that implementing an ECA in the Gulf of Thailand could substantially reduce emissions. The findings offer actionable insights for policymakers, including strategies like adopting low-sulfur fuels, optimizing shipping routes, and incentivizing cleaner technologies. Furthermore, this study highlights the importance of addressing economic challenges and ensuring comprehensive data collection to capture seasonal and demand-driven emission variations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cite this article:
Premsamarn, P., Win, T.K., Watanabe, D. (2025). Assessing the impact of emission control areas policy on ship emissions in the Gulf of Thailand using AIS data. Maritime Technology and Research, 7(3), 275311. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2025.275311
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Highlights
- Oil tankers are the largest contributors, accounting for 75 % of total emissions.
- AIS data reveals emission hotspots in port areas and major shipping lanes in the Gulf of Thailand.
- Comparing emissions in the Gulf of Thailand with existing ECA areas highlights the potential for significant emission reductions.
- A bottom-up approach using AIS data provides precise spatial analysis of emissions.
- Adopting low-sulfur fuels and clean technologies could significantly reduce ship emissions.
References
Aksoyoglu, S., Baltensperger, U., & Prévôt, A. S. H. (2016). Contribution of ship emissions to the concentration and deposition of air pollutants in Europe. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 16(4), 1895-1906. https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1895-2016
Buhaug, Ø., Corbett, J. J., Endresen, Ø., Eyring, V., Faber, J., Hanayama, S., Lee, D. S., Lee, D., Lindstad, H., Markowska, A. Z., Mjelde, A., Nelissen, D., Nilsen, J., Pålsson, C., Winebrake, J. J., Wu, W., & Yoshida, K. (2009). Second IMO GHG Study 2009. London, UK: International Maritime Organization.
Chen, D., Liang, D., Li, L., Guo, X., Lang, J., & Zhou, Y. (2021). The temporal and spatial changes of ship-contributed PM2.5 due to the inter-annual meteorological variation in Yangtze River Delta, China. Atmosphere, 12(6), 722. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos12060722
ClassNK. (n.d.). SOx and PM regulations. Retrieved from https://www.classnk.or.jp/hp/ja/activities/statutory/soxpm/index.html
Corbett, J. J., Winebrake, J. J., Green, E. H., Kasibhatla, P., Eyring, V., & Lauer, A. (2007). Mortality from ship emissions: A global assessment. Environmental Science & Technology, 41(24), 8512-8518. https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es071686z
DNV GL. (2018). Air emissions from shipping in the ASEAN region (Report No. 2018-0260, Rev. 1). Norwegian Maritime Authority.
Dulebenets, M. A. (2016). Advantages and disadvantages from enforcing emission restrictions within emission control areas. Maritime Business Review, 1(2), 107-132. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MABR-05-2016-0011
Faber, J., Hanayama, S., Zhang, S., Pereda, P., Comer, B., Hauerhof, E., van der Loeff, W. S., Smith, T., Zhang, Y., Kosaka, H., Adachi, M., Bonello, J. M., Galbraith, C., Gong, Z., Hirata, K., Hummels, D., Kleijn, A., Lee, D. S., Liu, Y., Lucchesi, A., Mao, X., Muraoka, E., Osipova, L., Qian, H., Rutherford, D., de la Fuente, S. S., Yuan, H., Perico, C. V., Wu, L., Sun, D., Yoo, D. H., & Xing, H. (2021). Fourth IMO GHG Study 2020. International Maritime Organization.
Firląg, S., Rogulski, M., & Badyda, A. (2018). The influence of marine traffic on particulate matter (PM) levels in the region of Danish straits, north and Baltic seas. Sustainability, 10(11), 4231. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10114231
Hassellöv, I. M., Turner, D. R., Lauer, A., & Corbett, J. J. (2013). Shipping contributes to ocean acidification. Geophysical Research Letters, 40, 2731-2736. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/grl.50521
International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2014). Diesel and gasoline engine exhausts and some nitroarenes: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 105. Retrieved from https://publications.iarc.fr/129
International Maritime Organization. (2003). Guidelines for the installation of a shipborne automatic identification system (AIS) (SN/Circ.227). London, UK: International Maritime Organization.
International Maritime Organization. (2015). Resolution A.1106(29): Revised guidelines for the onboard operational use of shipborne automatic identification systems (AIS) (A 29/Res.1106). London, UK: International Maritime Organization.
Jalkanen, J. P., Johansson, L., Kukkonen, J., Brink, A., Kalli, J., & Stipa, T. (2012). Extension of an assessment model of ship traffic exhaust emissions for particulate matter and carbon monoxide. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 12(5), 2641-2659. https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2641-2012
Jalkanen, J. P., Majamäki, E., Heikkilä, M., & Johansson, L. (2023). Emissions from Baltic Sea shipping in 2022. Finnish Meteorological Institute. Retrieved from HELCOM Baltic Sea Environment Fact Sheets 2023.
Li, C., Yuan, Z., Ou, J., Fan, X., Ye, S., Xiao, T., et al. (2016). An AIS-based high-resolution ship emission inventory and its uncertainty in the Pearl River Delta region, China. Science of the Total Environment, 573, 1-10. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.219
Li, Y., Xie, W., Yang, Y., Mei, Q., Wang, Z., Li, Z., & Wang, P. (2023). Research on the carbon emissions traceability inventory and multi-horizon prediction of ship carbon emissions: A case study of Tianjin Port. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10, 1174411. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1174411
Lindstad, H., Asbjørnslett, B. E., & Strømman, A. H. (2011). Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and cost by shipping at lower speeds. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3456-3464. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.044
Liu, T., & Ma, J. (2022). Ship navigation behavior prediction based on AIS data. IEEE Access, 10, 47997-48008. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172308
Miola, A., & Ciuffo, B. (2011). Estimating air emissions from ships: Meta-analysis of modelling approaches and available data sources. Atmospheric Environment, 45(13), 2242-2251. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.046
Ng, S. K., Loh, C., Lin, C., Booth, V., Chan, J. W. M., Yip, A. C., Li, Y., & Lau, A. K. H. (2013). Policy change driven by an AIS-assisted marine emission inventory in Hong Kong and the Pearl River Delta. Atmospheric Environment, 76, 102-112. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.070
Sathapongpakdee, P. (2023). Thailand Industry Outlook 2023-2551: Sea Freight Transport. Krungsri Research.
Shi, K., Weng, J., & Li, G. (2020). Exploring the effectiveness of ECA policies in reducing pollutant emissions from merchant ships in Shanghai port waters. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 155, 111164. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111164
Smith, T. W. P., Jalkanen, J. P., Anderson, B. A., Corbett, J. J., Faber, J., Hanayama, S., O’Keeffe, E., Parker, S., Johansson, L., Aldous, L., Raucci, C., Traut, M., Ettinger, S., Nelissen, D., Lee, D. S., Ng, S., Agrawal, A., Winebrake, J. J., Hoen, M., Chesworth, S., & Pandey, A. (2015). Third IMO Greenhouse Gas Study 2014: Executive Summary and Final Report. International Maritime Organization.
Starcrest Consulting Group, LLC. (2021). San Pedro Bay Ports Emissions Inventory Methodology Report. Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles.
Sustainable Ships. (2023). Masterclass Emission Control Area. Retrieved from https://www.sustainable-ships.org/internal-stories/general-terms-and-conditions
Svanberg, M., Santén, V., Hörteborn, A., Holm, H., & Finnsgård, C. (2019). AIS in maritime research. Marine Policy, 106, 103520. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103520
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2002). Health assessment document for diesel engine exhaust (EPA/600/8-90/057F). Washington, DC: National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Transportation and Air Quality.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). Regulatory Impact Analysis: Control of Emissions of Air Pollution from Category 3 Marine Diesel Engines (EPA-420-R-09-019). Office of Transportation and Air Quality.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2016). National Port Strategy Assessment: Reducing Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases at U.S. Ports (EPA-420-S-16-002). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2016). Third report to Congress: Highlights from the Diesel Emission Reduction Program (EPA-420-R-16-004). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2022). Port emissions inventory guidance: Methodologies for estimating port-related and goods movement mobile source emissions (EPA-420-B-22-011). Transportation and Climate Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality.
UNCTAD. (2024). Review of Maritime Transport 2024: Navigating maritime chokepoints. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/publication/review-maritime-transport-2024
Walker, T. R. (2016). Green marine: An environmental program to establish sustainability in marine transportation. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 105(1), 199-207. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.02.029
Walsh, C., & Bows, A. (2012). Size matters: Exploring the importance of vessel characteristics to inform estimates of shipping emissions. Applied Energy, 98, 128-137. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.03.015
Wan, Z., Zhang, Q., Xu, Z., Chen, J., & Wang, Q. (2019). Impact of emission control areas on atmospheric pollutant emissions from major ocean-going ships entering Shanghai Port, China. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 142, 525-532. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.03.053
Wang, C., & Corbett, J. J. (2007). The costs and benefits of reducing SO₂ emissions from ships in the US West Coastal waters. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 12(8), 577-588. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2007.08.003
Weng, J., Han, T., Shi, K., & Li, G. (2022). Impact analysis of ECA policies on ship trajectories and emissions. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 179, 113687. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113687
Win, T. K., & Watanabe, D. (2024). Study of air pollution diffusion from ships based on AIS data: Survey of the situation in the port of Yangon. Transactions of Navigation, 9(1), 1-10. https://dx.doi.org/10.18949/jintransnavi.9.1_1
Yau, P. S., Lee, S. C., Corbett, J. J., Wang, C., Cheng, Y., & Ho, K. F. (2012). Estimation of exhaust emissions from ocean-going vessels in Hong Kong. Science of the Total Environment, 431, 299-306. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.092
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maritime Technology and Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
