Development of Competency-based Learning Activity Packages to Promote Reading Literacy among Basic Education Students
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to 1) study the current problems and needs assessment in developing reading literacy, and 2) develop and examine the effects of competency-based learning activity packages on reading literacy among basic education students. The packages integrated the SMART Teaching approach and Kolb’s (1984) experiential learning cycle for students from Grade 1 to Grade 12. The study employed a synthesized mixed-methods design based on action research across 10 grade levels, utilizing a collaborative three-phase structure: user experience and needs assessment analysis of teachers and students, prototype design and development of the activity packages, and evaluation with reflection. The key informants were teachers and students from each grade level. The research instruments included the learning activity packages, a PISA-framework-based reading literacy test, a user experience survey, and reflection logs. The instruments were validated with an index of item-objective congruence (IOC) ranging from 0.67 to 1.00 and reliability coefficients between 0.81 and 0.89. Data were analyzed using the t-test and content analysis. The findings showed that: 1) Students across all grade levels experienced a state of being able to read but lacking literacy; learners could decode words fluently but lacked competencies in interpreting and evaluating texts according to the PISA framework. 2) The studied areas required a structured reading competency system continuous with age groups. 2Students across all grade levels achieved statistically significantly higher post-test mean scores in reading literacy than pre-test scores at the .05 level. The achievement gaps between high-ability and low-ability students.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ปรากฏในวารสารนี้ เป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียน ซึ่งสมาคมนักวิจัยไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วยเสมอไป การนำเสนอผลงานวิจัยและบทความในวารสารนี้ไปเผยแพร่สามารถกระทำได้ โดยระบุแหล่งอ้างอิงจาก "วารสารสมาคมนักวิจัย"
References
สถาบันส่งเสริมการสอนวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี. (2562). ผลการประเมิน PISA 2018 การอ่าน คณิตศาสตร์ และวิทยาศาสตร์. กรุงเทพฯ: สถาบันส่งเสริมการสอนวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี.
สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2562). แนวทางการพัฒนาสมรรถนะผู้เรียนระดับการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา.
Chen, J., Zhang, Y., & Hu, J. (2021). Synergistic effects of instruction and affect factors on high- and low-ability disparities in elementary students' reading literacy. Reading and Writing, 34, 199-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10070-0
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Koyuncu, I., & Firat, T. (2021). Investigating reading literacy in PISA 2018 assessment. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.26822/IEJEE.2021.189
Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (Eds.). (2019). PIRLS 2021 assessment frameworks. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. Retrieved June 30, 2026, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED606056.pdf
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Translated Thai References
Office of the Education Council. (2019). Guidelines for developing learner competencies in basic education. Bangkok: Office of the Education Council. (In Thai)
Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (2019). PISA 2018 results: Reading, mathematics, and science. Bangkok: IPST. Retrieved June 30, 2026, from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2018-results-volume-i_5f07c754-en/full-report.html (In Thai)
