Attitude Toward and Variables Affecting English Speaking Practice Through Computer- Assisted Instruction
Keywords:
Computer Assisted Instruction Program, attitudes, English speaking trainingAbstract
This research investingated a group of 41 the Mattayom 6 students at Hatyairatprachasan School in a Computer Assisted Instruction Program. The results were as follow: The students’ attitude toward practicing speaking English via Computer Assisted Instruction Program was favorable at a high level (=4.13 out of 5.00) ; the variables affecting practicing speaking English through Computer-Assisted Instruction was the speaking English content in the Computer Assisted Instruction Program (=4.49 out of 5.00).
References
Angwattanakul, S. (1997). Methodology of Teaching English.Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. State of the art article language Teaching, 40(1), 21-40.
Berrett, D. (2012). How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The Chronicle of Higher Education
Bloom, B.S. (1976). Human Characteristics and School Learning. New York: McGraw Hill.
Brown, H.D. (2005). Teaching by principles and interactive approach to language pedagogy.New Jersey. Prentice Hall Regents.
Carter, R.Numan,D.(2013). The set of development L2 skill. U.K: Cambridge University Press.
Chiramanee, N. (2007). Intensive Teaching Listening and Speaking toward Sudents’ Language Ability : A Case Study of Thidanukro School, Hatyai, Songkhla : The Thailand Research Fund.
Gardner, R.C.& Lambert, W.E.(1972). Motivation Variables in Second Language Acquisition. In Attitude and Motivation in Second Language Learning.266-272. Massachusetts: Newsberry House, 1972.
Genesee, F.(2000.) Brain research: implications for second language learning. Eric Digest, December.Retrieved on June 1, 2003.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 249-252.
Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in Use for Second Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93,769-782.0026-7902/09/769-782
Littlewood, W.T. (1981). Commucative Language Teaching An introduction. Cambridge University Press.P.1.
Ministry of Education. (2008). The Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E.2551 (A.D.2008): Foreign Language Department.Bangkok.
Olsen&Kagan,(1992).Cooperative language learning: a teacher’s resource book. In: Kessler, C.(Ed.)
Oxford, R.(1990). Language Learning Strategies: What every teachers should know. The University of Alabama.
Padwick, A. (2010). Attitudes towards English and Varieties of English in Globalizing India. University of Groningen.Newcastle, England.
Pongpanich, N. (2011). A Study of Problems in English Speaking in Speech Communication of Management Sciences Studnts+ Kasetsart University, Sriracha Campus: .18 (1): 85-97.
Reid, N.(2003). Getting started in pedagogical research in the physical science. LTSN Physical Sciences Centre,University of Hull. Hull Available:https://hlst.ltsn.ac.uk/ assets/ps/ documents/practice
Testden. (2015). TOEFL Speaking Grades. Retrieved from https://testden.com/toefl/ speaking.thm
Visser, P.S, (2008). Knowledge and Attitudes. In Wonsbach & M.W.
Walberg, Hebbert,J.(1989). The Effective Teacher. New York: McGraw-Hill,1989.
Wiley and Wrigley, G. (1987).Communicating in the real world: Developing Communication Skills for Business and the Professions. California State University, Long Beach. PrenticeHall Regents.
Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. State of the art article language Teaching, 40(1), 21-40.
Berrett, D. (2012). How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The Chronicle of Higher Education
Bloom, B.S. (1976). Human Characteristics and School Learning. New York: McGraw Hill.
Brown, H.D. (2005). Teaching by principles and interactive approach to language pedagogy.New Jersey. Prentice Hall Regents.
Carter, R.Numan,D.(2013). The set of development L2 skill. U.K: Cambridge University Press.
Chiramanee, N. (2007). Intensive Teaching Listening and Speaking toward Sudents’ Language Ability : A Case Study of Thidanukro School, Hatyai, Songkhla : The Thailand Research Fund.
Gardner, R.C.& Lambert, W.E.(1972). Motivation Variables in Second Language Acquisition. In Attitude and Motivation in Second Language Learning.266-272. Massachusetts: Newsberry House, 1972.
Genesee, F.(2000.) Brain research: implications for second language learning. Eric Digest, December.Retrieved on June 1, 2003.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 249-252.
Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in Use for Second Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93,769-782.0026-7902/09/769-782
Littlewood, W.T. (1981). Commucative Language Teaching An introduction. Cambridge University Press.P.1.
Ministry of Education. (2008). The Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E.2551 (A.D.2008): Foreign Language Department.Bangkok.
Olsen&Kagan,(1992).Cooperative language learning: a teacher’s resource book. In: Kessler, C.(Ed.)
Oxford, R.(1990). Language Learning Strategies: What every teachers should know. The University of Alabama.
Padwick, A. (2010). Attitudes towards English and Varieties of English in Globalizing India. University of Groningen.Newcastle, England.
Pongpanich, N. (2011). A Study of Problems in English Speaking in Speech Communication of Management Sciences Studnts+ Kasetsart University, Sriracha Campus: .18 (1): 85-97.
Reid, N.(2003). Getting started in pedagogical research in the physical science. LTSN Physical Sciences Centre,University of Hull. Hull Available:https://hlst.ltsn.ac.uk/ assets/ps/ documents/practice
Testden. (2015). TOEFL Speaking Grades. Retrieved from https://testden.com/toefl/ speaking.thm
Visser, P.S, (2008). Knowledge and Attitudes. In Wonsbach & M.W.
Walberg, Hebbert,J.(1989). The Effective Teacher. New York: McGraw-Hill,1989.
Wiley and Wrigley, G. (1987).Communicating in the real world: Developing Communication Skills for Business and the Professions. California State University, Long Beach. PrenticeHall Regents.
Downloads
Published
2018-10-11
How to Cite
อร่ามวิทย์ ช., & มูสิกรังษี ส. (2018). Attitude Toward and Variables Affecting English Speaking Practice Through Computer- Assisted Instruction. KASEM BUNDIT JOURNAL, 19(October), 14–26. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jkbu/article/view/144897
Issue
Section
Research articles
License
ทัศนคติ ความคิดเห็นใด ๆ ที่ปรากฏในวารสารเกษมบัณฑิตฉบับนี้เป็นของผู้เขียน โดยเฉพาะ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษมบัณฑิตและบรรณาธิการ ไม่จำเป็นต้องมีความเห็นพ้องด้วย
