The Evaluation of Dual Master Degree in Public Administration and Business Administration Curriculum (Improved Curriculum, 2018)
Keywords:
Curriculum evaluation, objective of the curriculum, satisfactionAbstract
This research was a quantitative research employing questionnaire for data collection from students, graduates, employers of graduates, faculty members, and experts. It was revealed that faculty members, employers of a graduates and experts demonstrated that the programme were very much responsive to present social need and real life whereas present students and graduates expressed very favorable attitude toward the program in the said espects. Moreover, employers of graduates reported that they were very satisfied with the graduates in both their qualifications and performances.
References
erences
Bobbit, Franklin. (1973). The Curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. : 42
Good, C.V. (1973). Dictionary of Education. 4th ed. New York : McGraw-Hill Book.
Kerr, J.R. (1976). The Curriculum: Content, Design & Development. Edinburgh :Oliver & Boyd.: 16-17.
Lewis, Arther J., and Miel, Alice. (1972). Supervision for Improved Instruction. Belmont, California:Wore Worth Publishing Company,Inc.
Oliva , Peter F. (1992) . Developing The Curriculum 3 rd ed. New York : Harper Collins Publishers.
Saylor , Alexander and Lewis. (1981). Curriculum Planning for The Better Teaching and Learning. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.Taba.
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. (1970: 218), Educational evaluation and Decision Making.Iilinois : F. E. Peacock Publishing.
Tyler, R.W. (1986). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago The University of Chicago Press.: 79.
Wongyai, Wichai. (2554). Development of higher education curriculum. 2 nd ed.Bangkok. Beauchamp, G.A. (1975). Curriculum theory . 4 th ed.. Itasca : Fe Peacock.
Zais, R.S. (1976).Curriculum: Principle and Foundations. New York :Thomas Y. Crowell.: 439.
Bobbit, Franklin. (1973). The Curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. : 42
Good, C.V. (1973). Dictionary of Education. 4th ed. New York : McGraw-Hill Book.
Kerr, J.R. (1976). The Curriculum: Content, Design & Development. Edinburgh :Oliver & Boyd.: 16-17.
Lewis, Arther J., and Miel, Alice. (1972). Supervision for Improved Instruction. Belmont, California:Wore Worth Publishing Company,Inc.
Oliva , Peter F. (1992) . Developing The Curriculum 3 rd ed. New York : Harper Collins Publishers.
Saylor , Alexander and Lewis. (1981). Curriculum Planning for The Better Teaching and Learning. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.Taba.
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. (1970: 218), Educational evaluation and Decision Making.Iilinois : F. E. Peacock Publishing.
Tyler, R.W. (1986). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago The University of Chicago Press.: 79.
Wongyai, Wichai. (2554). Development of higher education curriculum. 2 nd ed.Bangkok. Beauchamp, G.A. (1975). Curriculum theory . 4 th ed.. Itasca : Fe Peacock.
Zais, R.S. (1976).Curriculum: Principle and Foundations. New York :Thomas Y. Crowell.: 439.
Downloads
Published
2018-10-11
How to Cite
เจียรจินดา น., ธรสารสมบัติ ว., & เวศสุนทรเทพ ว. (2018). The Evaluation of Dual Master Degree in Public Administration and Business Administration Curriculum (Improved Curriculum, 2018). KASEM BUNDIT JOURNAL, 19(October), 295–311. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jkbu/article/view/145568
Issue
Section
Research articles
License
ทัศนคติ ความคิดเห็นใด ๆ ที่ปรากฏในวารสารเกษมบัณฑิตฉบับนี้เป็นของผู้เขียน โดยเฉพาะ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษมบัณฑิตและบรรณาธิการ ไม่จำเป็นต้องมีความเห็นพ้องด้วย
