Causal Factors Innovative Work Behavior of Employees in Local Administrative Organizations in Sakon Nakhon Province


  • Samart Aiyakorn


Transformational leadership, Perceived organizational justice, Work engagement, Organizational trust, Innovative work behaviors


The objective of this research aims 1) examines the level of causal factors namely
transformational leadership perceived organizational justice work engagement organizational
trust and innovative work behavior 2) examines the causal factors influencing innovative work
behavior and 3) proposes policies for developing the innovative working behavior. This
research employs mixed method research methodology and uses stratified random sampling to
obtain 293 samples from the employees in local administrative organizations in Sakon Nakhon
Province. Additionally, this research uses questionnaire and semi-structure interview for collect
data from samples. For the statistics, this research uses means, standard deviation, correlation
coefficient, regression analysis and path analysis techniques. The result of this research
founds the levels of transformational leadership, perceived organizational justice, work
engagement, organization trust and innovative work behaviors are considered as ‘high’ levels;
transformational leadership has influences the innovative work behaviors at significance.
Conversely, perceived organizational justice has no significance influences the innovative work
behaviors. Moreover, work engagement has influences the innovative work behaviors at
significance. Likewise, organization trust has influences the innovative work behaviors at
significance. For transformational leadership has influences the work engagement at
significance. Perceived organizational justice has influences on the work engagement at
significance. Transformational leadership has influences on the organization trust at

significance. Additionally, transformational leadership and perceived organizational justice have
indirect influence on the Innovative work behaviors by work engagement and organizational
trust at mediators. In summation, all causal factors have 84.60 percent predicts the innovative
work behaviors of the employees in local administrative organizations in Sakon Nakhon
Province. This research also provides policies for developing the innovative working behavior
of the employees in local administrative organizations in Sakon Nakhon Province includes the
policy recommendation should be the organizational management development system, the
holistic employee development system and the executives and personal development


Agarwa, A. U. 2014. Linking justice, trust and innovative work behavior to work engagement.

Personnel Review. Vol. 43 No. 1. 41 - 73.

Banchirdrit, S. 2021. New Normal of Human Resource Management in Business Sector in

Post – Covid-19. Journal of Research and Development Institute, Rajabhat Maha

Sarakham University. Vol. 8. No. 2. 45 – 59.

Bandura, A. 1977. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological

review. Vol. 84. No. 2. 191 - 208.

Bass, B. M. and Avolio, B. J. 1994. Improving organizational effectiveness through

transformational leadership. Newbery Park CA: sage.

Chumkesornkulkit, P. and Na Wichian, S. 2018. Innovative work Behavior: Concept,

Antecedents and Challenges. Journal of Behavioral Science for Development

(JBSD). Vol. 10. No. 1. 25 – 41.

Cui, Y. and Jiao, H. 2019. Organizational justice and management trustworthiness during

organizational Change: Interactions of Benevolence, Integrity, and managerial

approaches. Information Processing and Management. Vol. 56. 1526 – 1542.

De Jong, J. P. J. and Den Hartog, D. N. 2010. Measuring Innovative Work Behavior.

Creativity and Innovation Management. Vol. 19. 23 – 36.

Dick, V. R. et al. 2018. Identity leadership going global: Validation of the Identity Leadership

Inventory across 20 countries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational

Psychology. Vol. 91. 697 – 728.

Elrehail, H. Emeagwali, O. L. and Alsaad, A. 2018. The impact of Transformational and

Authentic leadership on innovation in higher education: The contingent role of

knowledge sharing. Telematics and Informatics. Vol. 35. 55 – 67.

Folger, R. and Cropanzano, R. 1998. Organizational justice and Human Resource

Management. California: Sage.

Gemeda, H. K. and Lee, J. 2020. Leadership styles, work engagement and outcomes among

information and communications technology professionals: A cross-national study.

Heliyon. Vol 6. e036992.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham, R. L. 2006. Multivariate

data analysis (Vol. 6). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Google


Ilyas, S. Abid, G. and Ashfaq, F. 2020. Ethical leadership in sustainable organizations: The

moderating role of general self-efficacy and the mediating role of organizational trust.

Sustainable Production and Consumption. Vol. 22. 195 – 204.

Imran, R. 2019. High Performance Work System, Job Engagement and Innovative Work

Behavior: An Exploration in Omani Context. Proceedings of the 2019 2nd

International Conference on Computers in Management and Business. 24 – 28.

Jena, L. K. Pradhan, S. and Panigrahy, N. P. 2018. Pursuit of organisational trust: Role of

employee engagement, psychologicall well - being and transformational leadership.

Asia Pacific Management Review. Vol. 23. 227 – 234.

Jituea, N. and Jadesadalug, V. 2018. Perceived Organizational Justice on Creativity Work

Behavior and Innovation work Performance: The Mediating Effect of Affective

Commitment of Lecturer at Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi.

Phuket Rajabhat University Academic Journal. Vol. 14. No 2. 349 - 380.

Kim, W. and Park, J. 2017. Examining Structural Relationships between Work Engagement,

Organizational Procedural Justice, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovative Work Behavior

for Sustainable Organizations. Sustainability. Vol. 9 No. 205. doi:10.3390/su9020205

King, N. and West, M. A. 2002. Experiences of Innovation at work. Journal of Managerial

Psychology. Vol. 2. No. 3. 6 – 10.

Kmieciak, R. 2020. Trust, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior: empirical

evidence from Poland. European Journal of Innovation Management.


Koednok, S. and Sungsanit, M. 2018. A Causal Model of Innovative trust on Innovative Work

Behavior: The Mediating Role of Employee Work Passion. Human Resource and

Organization Development Journal. Vol. 10. No. 2. 33 – 57.

Kumsrisook, T. and Wongwattanapong, K. 2022. Barriers in Personnel Management of Local

Government Organizations. Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi. Vol. 7. No 1.

- 386.

Latan, H. 2014. The Role of Organizational Justice, Trust and Commitment in a Management

Control System (MCS) - Gain Sharing. International Journal of Accounting and

Financial Reporting. Vol. 4 No. 2. 185 - 200.

Li, H. Sajjad, N. Wang, Q. Ali, A. M. Khaqan, Z. and Amina, S. 2019. Influence of

Transformational Leadership on Employees’ Innovative Work Behavior in Sustainable

Organizations: Test of Mediation and Moderation Processes. Sustainability. Vol 11.

Issue 1594. doi:10.3390/su11061594

Martins Marques De Lima Rua, Manuel, O., Araujo, C., Manuel, J. 2016. Linking

transformational leadership and organizational trust: has organizational commitment a

mediating effect on it?. Cuadernos de Gestion. Vol. 16. No. 1. 43 – 61.

Meng, J. and Berger, K. B. 2019. The impact of Organizational culture and leadership

performance on PR professionals’ Job satisfaction: Testing joint mediating effect of

engagement and trust. Public Relations Review. Vol. 45. 64 - 75.

Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded

sourcebook: Sage Publications.

Mohammed, A. K. Alaa S. J. and Ahmad, A. R. 2019. The Impact of Organizational Justice

Dimensions on Organizational Commitment among Bank Employees. International

Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation. Vol. 23 No. 2. 501 - 513.

Muangamporn, N. 2018. The driving innovative in government organizations(M.P.A,

D.P.A.) Retrived December 30, 2021 from

Mushtaq, R. Ellahi, A. and Khan, M. B. 2019. Influence of Organizational Justice, Supervisor

Support, and Group Cohesiveness on Organizational Commitment: Mediated Role of

Ethical Behavior. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research. Vol. 34. No. 4. 919

– 934.

Nastasi, B. K. and Schensul, S. L. 2005. Contributions of qualitative research to the validity

of intervention research. Journal of School Psychology. Vol. 43. No. 3. 177 - 195.

Ogwuche, C. H. Urama, D. A. and Nyam, J I. 2019. Influence of Organizational culture and

justice on employee job performance among private organization in Makurdi

Metropolis. IFE PsychologIA : An International Journal. Vol. 27. No. 1. 36 - 44.

Page, D. 2018. Identifying Leadership Behaviors, Engagement, and Innovative work

behavior in Health care. Dissertation. Doctor of Education in Interdisciplinary

Leadership. Graduate School of Creighton University. Omaha, NE, USA.

Pojsupap, T.; Khasasin, R.; Kongtanasamut, P. and Prachuabmoh, A. 2020. A synthesis of the

theories in innovative behavior. Modern Management Journal. Vol. 18. No. 1. 1 – 14.

Rajabi, M. Abdar, Z. E. and Agoush, L. 2017. Organizational Justice and Trust Perceptions: A

Comparison of Nurses in public and private hospitals. WORLD FAMILY


Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V. and Bakker, A.B. 2002. The measurement

of engagement and burnout: a confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness

Studies. Vol. 3. 71 - 92.

Shaw, R. B. 1997. Trust in the balance: Building successful organizations on results,

integrity and concern. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Specht, D. A. 1975. On the evaluation of causal models. Social Science Research. Vol. 4.

No. 2. 113 – 133.

Taghipour, A., and Dezfuli, Z. K. 2013. Innovative behaviors: Mediate mechanism of

job attitudes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 84. 1617 - 1621.

Teepapa, T. 2020. The Relationship Between Employee Envelopment, Employee Engagement

and Innovative Work Behavior and Mediating role of Organizational Context of

Employees in Thai Organization. Journal of Suvarnabhumi Institute of Technology

(Humanities and Social Science). Vol. 6. No. 2. 224 – 241.

Uriesi, S. 2019. Organizational justice and trust in managers as factors of organizational

commitment. Psychology Series. Vol. 28. 57 – 66.

Wiratchai, N. 1999. Structural equation model (LISREL) statistical analysis for Research in

the Social Sciences and Behavioral sciences. 3th ed. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn


Wongtongluea, P. 2017. Factors Affecting the Innovative Work Behavior of Employees and

Guidelines for the Enhancement of Small and Medium Enterprises in the Food

Industry: A Mixed Methods Research. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation (Applied

Behavioral Science Research). Srinakharinwirot University.

Xie, Y. 2018. Leadership style and innovation atmosphere in enterprises: An empirical study.

Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 135. No. 10. 257 – 265.

Yamane, T. 1973. Statistics: an introductory analysis. New York: New York: Harper and


Yue, C. A. Men, L. R. Ferguson, M. A. 2019. Bridging transformational leadership, transparent

communication, and employee openness to change: The mediating role of trust.

Public Relations Review. Vol. 45. 1017792.






บทความวิจัย (Research Article)