The Development of A Sustainable Forest Management Model by Community Participation in National Park: A Case Study of Mae Yom National Park, Song District, Phrae Province

Main Article Content

Buchita Sungkaew
Pantharak Phookpan
Unchalee Rattana

Abstract

This article studied a model development of sustainable forest management with community participation at Mae Yom National Park. It aims to study the forest capacity and threats of Mae Yom National Park, status, and future development. Also, it attempts to develop a model of sustainable forest management with community participation at Mae Yom National Park in Song District of Phrae Province. It was a qualitative research. The findings were as follows. First, the forest area in Mae Yom National Park had environmental capacity in terms of teak forest and endangered wildlife species. Then, it had the economic capacity on tourism sites for recreation. The forest also had historical, social, and cultural capacity. However, its threats were illegal logging. Second, Sa-iab sub-district local communities took part in various activities of the Mae Yom forest management such as the management plan of Mae Yom National Park, area management, visitor management and network development for forest management. Third, a model of sustainable forest management should focus on a partnership of the public sector, communities, and forest management players. Also, a model should integrate Mae Yom forest activities.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sungkaew, B., Phookpan, P. ., & Rattana, U. . (2021). The Development of A Sustainable Forest Management Model by Community Participation in National Park: A Case Study of Mae Yom National Park, Song District, Phrae Province. Journal of Social Development and Management Strategy, 23(1), 1–29. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsd/article/view/245590
Section
บทความวิจัย Research Article

References

Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council. (2000). Best Practice in Protected Area Management Planning. Tasmania: Parks and Wildlife Service.

Chulalongkorn University. (1998). Ecological Impact Assessment of Kaeng Sue Ten Dam Project [In Thai]. Bangkok: Office of Environmental Policy and Plan.

Cinner, J.E., Daw, T.M., McClanahn, T.R., Muthiga, N., Abunge, C., Hamed, S., Mwaka, B., Rabearisoa, A., Wamukota, A., Fisher, E. & Jidddawi, N. (2012). Transitions toward Co-Management: The Process of Marine Resource Management Devolution in Three East African Countries. Global Environmental Change, 22(3), 651-658.

Dowding, K. (1995). Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the policy Network Approach. Political Studied, 43(1), 136-158.

Dudley. (2008). Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature.

Hoogstra-Klein, M.A., Permadi, D.B. & Yasmi, Y. (2012). The Value of Cultural Theory for Participatory Processes in Natural Resource Management. Forest Policy and Economics, 20(2012), 99-106.

Lane, M.B. (2003). Participation, Decentralization, and Civil Society: Indigenous Rights and Democracy in Environment Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(4), 360-373.

Leverington, F., Costa.K.L., Courrau, J., Pavese, H., Nolte, C., Marr, M., Coad, L., Burgess, N., Bomhard, B. & Hockings, M. (2010). Management Effectiveness Evaluation in Protected Areas – a Global Study. Australia: The University of Queensland.

Liu, W.H., Wu, C.C., Jhan, H.T. & Ho, C.H. (2011). The Role of Local Government in Marine Spatial Planning and Management in Taiwan. Marine Policy, 35(2), 105-115.

Lockwood, M., Davidson, J., Curtis, A., Stratford, E. & Griffith, R. (2009). Multi-level Environmental Governance: Lessons from Australian Natural Resource Management. Australian Geographer, 40(2), 169-186.

Lostarnau, C., Oyarzun, J., Maturana, H., Soto, G., Senoret, M., Soto, M., Rotting, T., Amezaga, J.M. & Oyarzum, R. (2011). Stakeholder Participation within The Public Environmental System in Chile: Major Gaps between Theory and Practice. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(10), 2470-2478.

Luzi, S., Hamouda, M.A., Sigrist, F. & Tauchnitz, E. (2008). Water Policy Networks in Egypt and Ethiopia. The Journal of Environment Development, 17(3), 238-268.

McDermott, M.H. (2009). Locating Benefits: Decision-spaces, Resource Access and Equity in US Community-based Forestry. Geoforum, 40(2), 249-259.

Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2011). Eleventh National Economic and Social Development Plan (2012-2016). Bangkok: Office of the Prime Minister.

Perkins, P.E. (2011). Public Participation in Watershed Management: International practices for Inclusiveness. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 36(5-6), 204-212.

Polapan, S. (2009). Impact of Forest Area Utilization by Local Communities to Habitat Utilization of Wildlife: A Case Study in Kaeng Krachan National Park [In Thai]. (M.Sc. Thesis). Bangkok: Kasetsart University.

Samanmitr K., Kam-yo T., Wannapong S., & Tiamtaisong W. (2012). Application of Geographic Information Systems for Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) at Natural Potential Site, Mae Yom National Park [In Thai]. Chiang Mai: Maejo University.

Sayan Kham-neung (ed.). (2006). Yom River, Golden Teakwood Forest, Way of life of Sa-Iab People [In Thai]. Bangkok: Wanida Press.

Sueb Nakasathien Foundation. (2015). Thai Forestry Situations [In Thai]. Bangkok: Sueb Nakasathien Foundation.

Sung-kaew, B. (2013). The Developmental Dynamics of Decentralized Decision-making for Local Actors in The Define Large Scale Irrigation Dam Project: Case Study of Kaeng Sua Ten Dam Project, Thailand [1997-2013] [In Thai]. (Ph.D. Dissertation). Bangkok: Thammasat University.

United Nations. (1962). Decentralization for National and Local Development. New York: United Nations Technical Assistance Programme.