Effects of Cooperative Learning and Peer Influence on English Debate Learning Experience of Novice Student Debaters: A Case Study of a University Debate Club
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This qualitative study focuses on how cooperative learning experience and peer influence plays a role in debate learning experience of novice student debaters. Of all of the emerging themes, this paper specifically presents the cooperative learning and peer influence theme. Eleven participants with no prior English debate experience were selected through purposive sampling. The participants completed ten sessions of English debate training and data were collected through the use of three instruments including three individual interviews, learning log diaries and class observations. Each of these instruments presented similar questions for the integrated analysis. Coding analysis was conducted and similar findings from each source suggested both positive and negative effects of cooperative learning and peer influence on the participants’ learning experience. The positive side was represented by knowledge and mental support occurring both directly and indirectly. For the knowledge support, the direct support was represented by peer-tutoring, consultation and knowledge/idea sharing, while the indirect support included peer observation /modeling and class immersion. In terms of mental support, participants directly benefit from peer consolation and indirectly from a sense of teamwork and togetherness and peer observation. However, the negative effects were found to include peer pressure and team overreliance causing discouragement and reduced individual responsibility. Effects of peer pressure were paralleled with individual’s level of self-esteem and class heterogeneity.
Article Details
References
Ahmed, N., Phatan, Z. H., & Khan, F. S. (2012). Exploring the causes of English language speaking anxiety among postgraduate students. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(2), 99-105.
Akerman, R., & Neale, I. (2011). Debating the evidence: An international review of current situation and perceptions (Research Report). Berkshire, England.
Alasmari, A., & Ahmed, S. S. (2013). Using debate in EFL classes. Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(1), 147-152.
Al-Yaseen, W. S. (2014). Cooperative learning in the EFL classroom.The 2014 WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings. Vienna, Austria.
Azizinezhad, M., Hashemi, M., & Darvishi, S. (2013). Application of cooperative learning in EFL classes to enhance the students’ languagelearning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 138-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.166
Battaglini, M., Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. M. P. (2005). Self-control in peer groups. Journal of Economic Theory, 123(2), 105-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2005.04.001
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). London, England: Allyn and Bacon.
Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2015). Cooperative learning and social skills development. In R. Gillies (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Developmentsin research and practice (pp.201-217). New York, NY: Nova Science.
Buechel, B., Mechtenberg, L., & Petersen, J. (2018). If I can do it, so can you! peer effects on perseverance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 155, 301-314.
Burek, D., & Losos, C. (2014). Debate: Where speaking and listening come first. voices from the middle, 22(1), 49-57, Retrieved from http://www.kateshuster.com/wp-content/uploads/debate-voices-published.pdf
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, England: Sage.
Chavangklang, T., & Suppasetseree, S. (2018). Enhancing Thai EFL university students’ reading comprehension through a flipped cooperative classroom. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 238-261.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches(3rd ed.). New York, NY: Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Cutrone, P. (2002). Using group work to facilitate speaking in an oral English class in Japan: A consideration of the positive benefits of such an approach. The Journal of Nagasaki University of Foreign Studies, 4, 67-77.
Darasawang, P. (2007). English language teaching and education in Thailand: A decade of Change. In D. Prescott (Ed.), English in Southeast Asia: varieties, literacies and literatures (pp.185-202). Newcastle, England: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Donato. R. (1988). A psycholinguistic rationale for collective activity in second language learning. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
Dörnyei, Z. (1997). Psychological processes in cooperative language learning: Group dynamics and motivation. Modern Language Journal, 81, 482-493.
Falk, A., & Knell, M. (2004). Choosing the Joneses: Endogenous goals and reference standards. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 417–435.
Festinger, L., Torrey, J., & Willerman, B. (1954). Self-evaluation as a function of attraction to the group. Human Relations, 7, 161-174.
Foss, K. A, & Reitzel, A. C. (1988). A Relationship Model for Managing secondindividualistic. Review of Educational Research, 44, 213–240.
Freely, A. J., & Steinberge, D. L.(2005). Argumentation and debate: Critical thinking for reasoned decision making. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Frijters, S., Dam, G. & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2006). Effects of dialogic learning on valueloaded critical thinking. Learning and Instruction. 18, 66-82.
Gillies, R. M. (2007). Cooperative learning: Integrating theory and practice. New York, NY: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329598
Goodwin, J. (2003). Students’ perspectives on debate exercises in content area classes. Communication Education. 52(1), 157-163.
Jacobs G. M., & McCafferty, S. G. (2006). Connections between cooperative learning and second language teaching and learning. In S. G. McCafferty, G. M. Jacobs, & Iddings, C. (Eds.), Cooperative learning and second language teaching (pp. 18-29). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Jacobs, G. M., Lee, G. S., & Ball, J. (1997). Learning cooperative learning via cooperative learning. San Clemente, CA:Kagan Cooperative Learning.
Jalilifar, A. (2009). The effect of cooperative learning techniques on college students’ reading comprehension. System, 38(1), 96-108.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1974). Instructional goal structure: Cooperative, competitive, or individualistic. Review of educational research, 44(2), 213-240. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543044002213J
ohnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1979). Conflict in the classroom: Constructive controversy and learning. Review of Educational Research, 49, 51–61.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1994). Leading the cooperative school (2nd Ed.) Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (2008). Cooperation in the classroom (8th ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1998). Active Learning Cooperation in the College Classroom (2nd ed.). Edina, MN: International Book.
Jolliffe, W. (2007). Cooperative learning in the classroom: putting it into practice. London, England: Paul Chapman.
Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Clemente, CA: Resources for Teachers.
Kagan, S. (1995). We Can Talk: Cooperative Learning in the Elementary ESL Classroom. Washington, DC: ERIC.
Kenedy, R. (2007). In-class debate: Fertile ground for active learning and the cultivation of critical thinking and oral communication. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 183-190.
Kennedy, R. (2009). The power of in-class debates. Active Learning in Higher Education. 10, 225-36.
Kettunen, J. (2015). Learning and teaching in the European strategic network. The Online Journal of Quality in Higher Education, 2(2), 57-64.
Kim, B. W. (2011). Students teaching students? peer teaching in the EFL classroom in Japan. The Language Teacher Reader’s Forum, 35(5), 32-34 Retrieved from https://jalt-publications.org/files/pdf-article/art2_18.pdf
Lirola, M. M. (2016). The importance of promoting multimodal teaching in the foreign language classroom for the acquisition of social competences: Practical examples. International Journal for 21st Century Education, 3(special), 77-88.
Lyman, F. T. (1981). The responsive classroom discussion: The inclusion of all students, College Park, MD: University of Maryland Press.
Malelohit, J. (2010). The effects of using STAD technique of cooperative learning method on English reading comprehension of second years students at Thaksin University, Phathalung Campus. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Thaksin University, 5(1), 175-181.
Malelohit, J. (2016). The effects of cooperative learning using student-teams-achievement division (STAD) technique on the undergraduate students’ learning outcome of English grammar at Thaksin University. Parichart journal, 28(2), 162-184.
Martínez, L. M. (2016).How to use cooperative learning for assessing students’ emotional competences: A practical example at the tertiary level. PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 18(2), 153-165.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Natthawut, P., & Suwannarak, S. (2018). Thai students and teachers’ perceptions of learning and teaching English through the communicative language teaching approach. NIDA Journal of Language and Communication, 23(33), 23-42.
Noom-Ura, S. (2013). English-t eaching problems in Thailand and Thai teachers’ professional development needs. English Language Teaching, 11(6), 139-147.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream.TESOL Quarterly, 21, 227-249.
Oros, A. (2007). Let’s Debate: Active Learning Encourages Student Participation and Critical Thinking. Journal of Political Science Education. 3, 292-311.
Polsombat, C. (2006) The development of English listening and speaking Skills for Pratomsuksa V students by using the communicative language teaching emphasizing the authentic assessment (Unpublished master’s thesis). Khon Khaen University, Khon Khaen, Thailand.
Quinn, P. (2006). Cooperative learning and student motivation(Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/ehd_theses/285/
Saldana (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researcher. London, England: Sage.
Shuster, K., & Meany, J. (2005). Speak out! debate and public speaking in the middle grades. New York, NY: International Debate Education Association.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning:Theory, research, and practice.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning; Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Slavin, R. E. (2008). Cooperative learning, success for all, and evidence-based reform in education. Éducation et didactique, 2(2), 149-157. doi: 10.4000/educationdidactique.334
Slavin, R. E. (1987). Cooperative learning and cooperative School. Educational leadership. 45(3), 7-13.
Somjai, S., & Jansem, A. (2015). The use of debate technique to develop speaking ability of grade ten students at Bodindecha (Sing Singhaseni) school. International Journal of Technical Research and Applications. Special Issue. 13, 27- 31. Retrieved from https://www.ijtra.com/special-issue-view.php?paper=the-use-of-debate-technique-to-develop-speaking-ability-of-grade-ten-students-at-bodindecha-sing-singhaseni-school.pdf
Song, Y., Loewenstein, George & Shi, Y. (2018). Heterogeneous effects of peer tutoring: evidence from rural Chinese middle schools. Research in Economics, Elsevier, 72(1), 33-48.
Suciati, S. (2016). Cooperative controversy technique to improve students’ motivation in English debate. Journal on English as a foreign language, 6(1), 43-58.
Suleimanova, Z. (2013). Speaking anxiety in a foreign language classroom in Kazakhstan. Precedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1860-1868. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042813035763.doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.131
Sun, D. (2014). From communicative competence to interactional competence: a new outlook to the teaching of spoken English. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(5), 1062-1070. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.5.1062-1070
Swain, M. & Watanabe, Y. (2012). Languaging: collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 3218-3225). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0664
Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky. (pp. 95-108). London, England: Continuum.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and Second Language Learning: Two Adolescent French Immersion Students Working Together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320-337. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wahyukti, T. (2017). Enhancing students' cooperative learning in an EFL classroom through lesson study. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR),(Vol. 109): the 4th Asia Pacific Education Conference (AECON 2017) (pp. 288 – 292). https://doi.org/10.2991/aecon-17.2017.53
Wanchai, N. (2012). Difficulties encountered in implementing a communicative curriculum: EFL teachers’ perspectives. Retrieved from http://www.culi.chula.ac.th/Research/e-Journal/2012/Final%20
Wichadee, S. (2007). The Effects of cooperative learning on English reading skills and attitudes of the first-year students at Bangkok University. Retrieved from https://www.bu.ac.th/knowledgecenter/epaper/july_dec2005/saovapa.pdf
Wiriyachitra, A. (2001). A Thai university English scenario in the coming decade. Thai TESOL, 14(1), 4-7.
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149(3681), 269-274.
Zare, P.& Othman, M. (2013). Classroom Debate as a systematic teaching/learning approach. World Applied Science Journal, 28(11), 1506 -1513.