A Comparative Analysis of the Attitude Resources in Chinese and US Mainstream Media Reports on the Xinjiang Cotton Controversy
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Xinjiang Cotton industry, which is primarily populated with Uyghur workers, has made headline news across the globe. Its discussion has important ramifications for how the world views China’s treatment of ethnic minorities. In this article, I explore how this industry and its workers are represented in one Chinese and one American newspaper. Specifically, I focus on how attitudinal choices are used in 40 news articles on the Xinjiang Cotton industry and surrounding controversies. Using Martin and White’s appraisal framework, I explore the similarities and differences between the New York Times and China Daily. Results show a comparable distribution of judgment, appreciation, and affect in both publications. However, the New York Times included more subjective and emotional positions than the China Daily. Furthermore, eight categories of representation were identified, each of which were used to present positive us-representations and negative them-representations. Moreover, strategic uses of attitude included applying affect to direct emotional messages among readers, employing judgment to increase authoritativeness, and creating opposite representations to their literal meanings. The study not only supports previous findings in the use of attitudinal resources in news discourse, but it also extends the scope of appraisal research by analyzing the representations of social and ethnic groups from a micro perspective.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).References
Arslan, Z., Bobghiashvili, G., Djafarova, L., & Hovhannisyan, E. (2018). Representation of minorities in the media in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Turkey. The Caucasus Edition: Journal of Conflict Transformation. https://caucasusedition.net/representation-of-minorities-in-the-media-in-armenia-azerbaijan-georgia-and-turkey/
Arunsirot, S. (2012). The use of appraisal theory to analyze Thai newspaper commentaries. MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities, 15(1), 70-89. https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-01501005
Atuel, H., Seyranian, V., & Crano, W. D. (2007). Media representations of majority and minority groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(3), 561-572. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.377
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2013). Discourse analysis and media attitudes: The representation of Islam in the British press. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920103
Bai, X. (2013). The contrastive analysis of the graduation resources in China and US press briefings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(10). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.10.1862-1867
Balkin, J. M. (2008). The future of free expression in a digital age. Pepperdine Law Review, 36, 427.
Bednarek, M. (2006). Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. A&C Black.
Cao, X., Zhang, D., & Luo, Q. (2022). Attitudinal stance towards the anti-extradition bill movement in China Daily and South China Morning Post: A corpus-assisted comparative analysis. Journal of Language and Politics, 21(1), 60-80. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21021.cao
Coffin, C. (2000). History as discourse: Construals of time, cause and appraisal [Doctoral dissertation, The University of New South Wales Sydney]. UNSWorks. https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/19764
Ellsworth, P. C. (2013). Appraisal theory: Old and new questions. Emotion Review, 5(2), 125-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912463617
Fernando, J. W., Kashima, Y., & Laham, S. M. (2017). Alternatives to the fixed-set model: A review of appraisal models of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 31(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1074548
Firmstone, J., Georgiou, M., Husband, C., Marinkova, M., & Steibel, F. (2009). Representation of minorities in the media: UK. Final analysis report.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771
Helle H. J. (2016). China: promise or threat?: a comparison of culture. Brill.
Homayounzadeh, M., & Mehrpour, S. (2013). A contrastive analysis of the American and Persian newspaper editorials. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 1-22.
Hood, S. (2004). Appraisal research: Taking a stance in academic writing. [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Technology, Sydney.
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford University Press.
Iedema, R., Feez, S., & White, P. R. R. (1994). Appraisal and journalistic discourse. Media literacy, 1-31.
Mahtani, M. (2001). Representing minorities: Canadian media and minority identities. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 33(3), 99-133.
Jackson, B. F. (2014). Censorship and freedom of expression in the age of Facebook. New Mexico Law Review, 44(1), 121-167.
Jakaza, E., & Visser, M. (2016). ‘Subjectivity’ in newspaper reports on ‘controversial’ and ‘emotional’ debates: An appraisal and controversy analysis. Language Matters, 47(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2015.1060513
Lams, L. (2016). Salience and representation of Islam and Uyghur Muslims in the Chinese Communist Party press. In S. Mertens & H. D. Smaele (Eds.), Representations of Islam in the news: A cross-cultural analysis (pp. 205-224). Lexington Books.
Liu, W., & Zhang, W. (2015). One coin has two sides: A comparative appraisal of New York Times and China Daily’s News coverage of alleged internet hacking. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 4(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v4i4.681
Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text (pp. 142-175). Oxford University Press.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910
Oteíza, T. (2017). The appraisal framework and discourse analysis. In T. Bartlett & G. O’Grady (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics (pp. 457-472). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315413891
Sabao, C., & Visser, M. (2015). Evaluating authorial ‘objectivity’ and ‘stance taking’ in reporting the making of a new constitution in Zimbabwean newspapers. Communication, 41(1), 4-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2015.1011178
Sabao, C. (2016). Arguments for an appraisal linguistic discourse approach to the analysis of ‘objectivity’ in ‘hard’ news reports. African Journalism Studies, 37(1), 40-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2015.1095776
Saeed, A. (2007). Media, racism and Islamophobia: The representation of Islam and Muslims in the media. Sociology Compass, 1(2), 443-462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00039.x
Soo-Guan Khoo, C., Nourbakhsh, A., & Na, J. C. (2012). Sentiment analysis of online news text: A case study of appraisal theory. Online Information Review, 36(6), 858-878. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521211287936
Sorabji, R. (2021). Freedom of speech and expression: Its history, its value, its good use, and its misuse. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197532157.001.0001
Stewart, M. (2015). The language of praise and criticism in a student evaluation survey. Studies in educational evaluation, 45, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.01.004
Ting-Toomey, S. (2010). Applying dimensional values in understanding intercultural communication. Communication Monographs, 77(2), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751003790428
Ungerleider. (1991). Media, minorities, and misconceptions: the portrayal by and representation of minorities in Canadian news media. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 23(3), 158-164.
Yum, J. O. (1988). The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. Communications Monographs, 55(4), 374-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758809376178
Zhuo, P. (2021, May). A comparative analysis of the engagement resources of Chinese and American newspapers on Hong Kong national security law. In 7th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2021) (pp. 665-668). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210519.131
Zhang, D. (2019). A comparative study of competing discursive construction of South China Sea disputes in the Chinese and US English-language newspapers. English Language and Literature Studies, 9(2), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v9n2p46
Zhang, Y., Akhtar, N., Farooq, Q., Yuan, Y., & Khan, I. U. (2021). Comparative study of Chinese and American media reports on the COVID-19 and expressions of social responsibility: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51(3), 455-472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09809-9