Income Inequality from Working While Studying: A Spatial Analysis of Factors and Work Characteristics Influencing Wages among Thai Students

Main Article Content

THITIMA PLUBPLUENG

Abstract

This study aims to (1) examine the determinants of hourly wages among students who work while studying, (2) analyze the relationship between working hours and weekly income, and (3) assess income inequality within this group. Using secondary data from the 2022 National Labor Force Survey, the analysis focused on 1,960 student workers. Two empirical approaches were employed: Quantile Regression to capture distributional differences in wage determinants across hourly wage levels, and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression to estimate the association between working hours and weekly income. Quantile Regression results show that age has a positive association with hourly wages (β = 1.102–2.084), with stronger effects at higher wage quantiles. Working hours exhibit a negative relationship with hourly wages (β = –0.312 to –0.525), while part-time student workers earn higher hourly wages than those working full-time (β = –2.980 to –5.310). A significant interaction effect between region and industry (β = 0.012) highlights spatial disparities in labor market returns. The OLS results indicate that each additional working hour increases weekly income by 31.56 baht. Wage inequality among student workers is moderate, reflected by a Gini coefficient of 0.276 and a P90/P10 ratio of 3.62. Inequality is more pronounced in urban areas (0.289) than in rural areas (0.255). This study contributes to the empirical literature by applying Quantile Regression to analyze wage structures among student workers in a developing-country context and provides the first systematic evidence of spatial interaction effects on student wages in Thailand. The findings underscore the need for targeted policies that support working students, reduce regional disparities, and promote access to higher-quality part-time employment opportunities.

Article Details

How to Cite
PLUBPLUENG, T. (2025). Income Inequality from Working While Studying: A Spatial Analysis of Factors and Work Characteristics Influencing Wages among Thai Students. KKBS Journal of Business Administration and Accountancy, 9(3), 169–187. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kkbsjournal/article/view/279384
Section
Research Articles

References

Baert, S., Neyt, B., Omey, E., & Verhaest, D. (2017). Student work, educational achievement and later employment: A dynamic approach (IZA Discussion Paper No. 11127). IZA – Institute of Labor Economics. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4114193

Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.

Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 75(299), 493–517.

Beffy, M., Fougère, D., & Maurel, A. (2009). L’impact du travail salarié des étudiants sur la réussite et la poursuite des études universitaires. Economie et Statistique, 422, 31-50. https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.2009.8017

International Labour Organization. (2018). Digital labour platforms and the future of work: Towards decent work in the online world. International Labour Office.

International Labour Organization. (2021). World employment and social outlook 2021: The role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work. International Labour Office.

International Labour Organization. (2022). Global Employment Trends for Youth 2022: Investing in transforming futures for young people. International Labour Office. https://doi.org/10.54394/QSMU1809

International Labour Organization. (2024). Global employment trends for youth 2024. International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/publications/major-publications/global-employment-trends-youth-2024

Khanna, G., & Morales, N. (2020). The IT boom and other unanticipated consequences of skilled immigration. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Koenker, R., & Bassett, G., Jr. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33–50.

Kroupová, Z., Havránek, T., & Iršová, Z. (2024). Student employment and education: A meta-analysis. Economics of Education Review, 100, Article 102539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102539

National Statistical Office. (2021). Report on the Household Socio-Economic Survey 2021. Bangkok: National Statistical Office.

National Statistical Office. (2023). Report on the Household Socio-Economic Survey 2021. Bangkok: National Statistical Office.

National Statistical Office. (2024). Report on the Household Socio-Economic Survey 2021. Bangkok: National Statistical Office.

National Economic and Social Development Council. (2017). Thailand 4.0: A New Economy Driven by Innovation. Bangkok: NESDC.

Neyt, B., Omey, E., Verhaest, D., & Baert, S. (2019). Does student work really affect educational outcomes? A review of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(3), 896–942. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12289

OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en

Phokatirakul, P. et al. (2020). The effect from working part-time job of the University Students in Nakhon Pathom Province. Journal of Academic for Public and Private Management, 2(3), 115–124.

Reich, M., Gordon, D. M., & Edwards, R. C. (1973). Dual labor markets: A theory of labor market segmentation. American Economic Review, 63(2), 359–365.

Soeakaew, S. (2018). Report of the Study of Part-time Employment Among KKU Students in 2018. Khon Kaen: Student Affairs and Alumni Relations Division, KKU.

Thianthai, C., & Tamdee, P. (2024). Understanding digital well-being and insights from technological impacts on university students' everyday lives in Bangkok. Journal of Health Research, 38(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.56808/2586-940X.1069

UNDP, & UNICEF. (2020). Socio-economic impact assessment of COVID-19 in Thailand. United Nations Country Team in Thailand.

UNICEF Thailand & Sasin Sustainability & Entrepreneurship Center. (2021). Voices of youth and employers on youth employability in Thailand. UNICEF Thailand.

Wattanarat, S. (2019). The disruption of platform economy on income generating: A case study of workers in on-demand food delivery platforms in Bangkok [Master's thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. Chula Digital Repository.

World Bank. (2021). Thailand Economic Monitor: Living with COVID in a digital world – December 2021. The World Bank Group.

World Bank. (2024). Bridging the gap: Inequality and jobs in Thailand (Updated ed.). World Bank Group.