Problems of Protection of the Accused’s Rights at the Preliminary Hearing for Case Filed by Public Prosecutor
Keywords:
Protection of Rights, Preliminary Hearing, Public Prosecutor, AccusedAbstract
This research aims to (1) study the concepts and principles concerning the protection of the accused’s rights at the preliminary hearing, (2) investigate the accused’s rights at the preliminary hearing in Thailand, Federal Republic of Germany and the United States of America, (3) analyze the problem of protection of the accused’s rights at the preliminary hearing for a case filed by the public prosecutor and (4) propose guidelines for amendment to the laws concerning the preliminary hearing for a case filed by the public prosecutor.
The study found the following results. (1) The concept of protection and restriction of rights and liberties of individuals included the principle of finding truth, the principle of case screening and the principle of bilateral hearing in terms of the protection of the accused’ rights at the preliminary hearing. (2) According to the study of the protection of the accused’s rights at the preliminary hearing in Thailand, Federal Republic of Germany and the United States of America, the accused had the right to access to the case screening process by the court, the right to present evidence and the right to appeal. (3) The preliminary hearing for a case filed by the public prosecutor in Thailand was different from Germany and the United States cases. Thai hearing had problems of inappropriate judicial discretion in preliminary hearing as well as restricting the accused’s right to present evidence to the court and right to appeal.
The author argues that the preliminary hearing for a case filed by the public prosecutor should be amended according to the Criminal Procedure Code in terms of determining discretion over preliminary hearing and the accused’s right to present evidence and appeal.
References
Chiraniti Havanon. (2000). Criminal Procedure Rights according to the Consti tution. Bangkok: Winyuchon.
Code of Criminal Procedure. (1935). Royal Gazette, 52(0A), 682, 683, 685, 686, 696.
Code of Criminal Procedure. (1956). Royal Gazette, 73(16A), 134.
Freckmann, A., Anke, L., Wegerich, J., & Thomas, C. (1999). The German legal system. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Kanueng Luechai. (2005). Criminal Procedure Law, Vol. 2. Bangkok: October Printing.
Kunlapol Phonwan. (1978). Laws and Natural Rights. Journal of Public Prosecutor, 6(2), 23.
Lafave, K., Wayne, R., Israel, P., Jerold, H., & Nancy, J. (2000). Criminal procedure (3rd ed.). St,Paul, Minn: West Publishing.
Narong Jaiharn. (2020). Principles of Law and Criminal Procedure, Vol. 2 (6th Edition). Bangkok: Winyuchon.
Smith, O., & Christopher, E. (2003). Criminal procedure. Belmont Calif U.S.A: Wadsworth.
Thira Suteewarangkun. (1999). Protection of Rights and Liberties of Individuals Recognized by the Constitution. Journal of Law , 14 (29), 590.
Wipha Pinweera. (2008). The Role of the Court in Criminal Proceedings. Master of Laws Thesis (Laws). Bangkok: Thammasat University.
Wisarn Panthuna. (1978). Criminal Procedure in the United States. Dulpaha, 5 (25), 39-49.
Worapoj Wisarutpit. (2000). Rights and Freedoms under the Constitution. Bangkok: Winyuchon.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Law and Local Society Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published are copyright of local law and society journals. Faculty of Law Surat Thani Rajabhat University
Content and information in articles published in local law and society journals It is the opinion and responsibility of the author of the article directly. which the journal editor It is not necessary to agree or share any responsibility for articles, information, content, images, etc. published in local law and society journals. It is the copyright of the local jurisprudence journal. If any person or entity wants to distribute all or part of it or to take any action must have prior written permission from the local jurisprudence journal only.