The Comparative Studies on Reaction against Violent Actions between Hannah Arendt and Frantz Fanon
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although violence is something should be abandoned in opinion of numerous democratic academics in present day. However black academician likes Frantz Fanon makes different way by creating novel idea that violence is a necessary factor for established democratic society. The question is that what does Fanon mean by violence? Why does he think violence is necessary or good? For Hannah Arendt she stays opposition. Arendt denies the existence of violence and she states that the nature of new societies is affected by the nature of actions that bring them into being, not bring them into dangerous like Fanon activities. This concept and activities of Fanon it would be very wrong. By these different ideas contribute to this article. The article aims to illustrate the concept of both academics on responsive against violence in humanity experience.
Article Details
References
Arendt, Hannah. (1951). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Florida, USA: The Harvest Book, Harcourt Brace & Company.
Arendt, Hannah. (1970). On Violence. New York, Harcourt, Brace&World.
Arendt, Hannah. (1998). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, Hannah. (1990). On Revolution. London, England: Penguin Books.
Baehr, Peter. (2000). The Portable of Hannah Arendt. New York, USA: Penguin Books.
Bernstein, Richard J. (2013). Violence: Thinking Without Banisters. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press
Chomsky, Noam. (2000). Rogue States: the rule of force in world affairs. London: Pluto Press.
Chomsky, Noam. (1967). The Legitimacy of Violence as a Political Act? Noam Chomsky debates with Hannah Arendt, Susan Sontag, et al. December 15, 1967. (p. 1-8) http://www.chomsky.info/debates/19671215.htm
Dietz, Mary G. “Arendt and the Holocaust.” In edited by Dana Villa. (2000). The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Fanon, Frantz. (1963). The Wretched of the Earth, Jean-Paul Sartre (preface), Constance Farrington (translator). England: Penguin Books.
Fanon, Frantz. (1965). A Dying Colonialism, Haakon Chevalier (translator), Adolfo Gilly (introduction). New York: Grove Press.
Fanon, Frantz. (1969).Toward the African Revolution, Haakon Chevalier (translator). New York: Grove Press.
Gibson, Nigel C. (2003). Fanon: the Postcolonial Imagination. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity.
Kant, Immanuel. “Toward Perpetual Peace.” In Reiss. H. (Ed.). (1991). Kant: Political Writings, 2nd. Cambridge University Press.
Lawson, George. (2008). A Realistic Utopia?: Nancy Fraser, cosmopolitanism and the making of a just world order. Political Studies, 56 (4). pp. 881-906. ISSN 0032-3217
Mansfield, Edward D. and Snyder, Jack. (1995). Democratization and War. Foreign Affairs. May/Jun95, Vol. 74 Issue 3, p79-97. 19p. 5 Graphs. , Database: Business Source Complete.
Passerin d'Entreves, Maurizio. (1994). The Political Philosophy of Hannah Arendt. London: Routledge.
Strauss, Leo. (1959). What is Political Philosophy? and Other Studies. Free Press.
Villa, Dana (1999). Politics, Philosophy, Terror: Essays on the Thought of Hannah Arendt. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, c1999.
Villa, Dana. “The Development of Arendt’s Political Thought.” In edited by Dana Villa. (2000). The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Wellmer, Alblecht. “Arendt on revolution.” In edited by Dana Villa. (2000). The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.