This is an outdated version published on 2022-01-02. Read the most recent version.

The Moderating Effect of CEO Gender on Relationship between CEO Tenure and Risk-taking

Authors

  • duangnapa sukhahuta 0824443777

Keywords:

CEO gender, CEO tenure, Risk-taking

Abstract

The objects of this study are to analyze the relationship between CEO tenure and firm risk-taking and to examine the effect of CEO gender as a moderator on the CEO tenure and risk-taking relationship of firms listed on Thai stock exchange. The result of the study shows that CEO tenure has significantly negative association with risk-taking. According to Agency theory, CEOs as an agent concern making utilities for themselves instead of maximizing benefits to the shareholders.

The result also shows that the effect of the interaction between CEO gender and CEO tenure is significantly positive to risk-taking at 0.01 level. Thus, this study confirms that CEO gender is a moderator. According to sub-group analysis, the relationship between CEO tenure and firm risk-taking is significantly negative at 0.01 level for male group. For female group, it shows the positive relationship between CEO tenure and firm risk-taking. But it is not significant. Thus, it can be concluded that the longer the male CEO held the position, the more dare they invested at risk.

References

บรรณานุกรม
ภิญญดาพัชญ์ ชัยจรัสเจริญลาภ (2558). คุณลักษณะของผู้บริหารสูงสุดและผลการดําเนินงานของบริษัท : กรณีศึกษา บริษัทจดทะเบียนในตลาดหลักทรัพย์แห่งประเทศไทย(SET100). หลักสูตร วิทยาศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต. สาขาวิชาการเงิน. มหาวิทยาลัยกรุงเทพ.
Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51(6), 1173–82.
Berger, P., Ofek, E., & Yermack, D. (1997). Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions. The Journal of Finance. 52(4), 1411-1438.
Cain, M. D., & Mckeon, S. B. (2014). CEO personal risk-taking and corporate policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 51(1), 139-164.
Chakraborty, A., Sheikh, S., & Subramanian, N. (2007). Termination risk and managerial risk taking. Journal of Corporate Finance. 13, 170-188.
Chen, D., & Zheng, Y. (2012). CEO tenure and risk-taking. Working Paper. University of Baltimore. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2038064.
Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2006). Managerial incentives and risk-taking. Journal of Financial Economics. 79(2), 431-468.
Grimm, C., & Smith, K. (1991). Management and Organizational Change: A Note on the Railroad Industry. Strategic Management Journal. 12(7), 557-562.
Hambrick, D.C., Cho, T.S., & Chen, M-J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms ‘competitive moves’. Administrative Science Quarterly. 41, 659-684.
Hermalin, B.E., & Weisbach, M.S. (1998). Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. The American Economic Review. 88, 96–118.
Hirshleifer, D. A., Low, A., & Teoh, S. H. (2012). Are overconfident CEOs better innovators? Journal of Finance. 67(4), 1457-1498.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 3(4), 305-360.
Kim, K., & Buchanan, R. (2011). CEO duality leadership and firm risk-taking propensity. Journal of Applied Business Research. 24(1), 27-41.
Martin, A. D., Nishikawa, T., & Williams, M. A. (2009). CEO gender: Effects on valuation and risk. Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting. 48(3), 23–40.
Meijer, M. (2017). CEO compensation and risk-taking: Evidence from the US banking industry. Retrieved from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:cDdVkR8FytsJ:arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi%3Ffid%3D145043+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=th
Muscarella, C., & Zhao, J. (2013). Promoting the quiet life or risk-taking? CEO severance contracts and managerial decision-making, Working paper, Penn State University.
Peni, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2010). Female executives and earnings management. Managerial finance. 35, 629-645.
Pierluigi, M., Alessandra, R., & Giuseppe D., (2020). The relationships between CEO characteristics and strategic risk-taking in family firms. Journal of Risk Research. 23(1), 95-116.
Ryan, H. E. J., & Wang, L. (2012). CEO mobility and the CEO-firm match: evidence from CEO employment history, Working paper, Georgia State University.
Serfling, M. A. (2013). CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies. Journal of Corporate Finance. 25, 251-273.
Simsek, Z. (2007). CEO tenure and organizational performance: an intervening model. Strategic Management Journal. 28, 653-662.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance. 52(2), 737-783.
Wambugu, A., Gichira, R., Wanjau, K., & Mung’atu, J. (2015). The Relationship Between Risk Taking and Performance of Small and Medium Agro Processing Enterprises In Kenya. International. Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management. 3, 441-455.
Walls, R. M. (2005). Corporate risk-taking and performance: A 20 year look at the petroleum industry. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 48,127-140.

Published

2022-01-02

Versions

How to Cite

sukhahuta, duangnapa. (2022). The Moderating Effect of CEO Gender on Relationship between CEO Tenure and Risk-taking. Modern Management Journal, 19(2). Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/stou-sms-pr/article/view/248037

Issue

Section

Academic Articles