LEGAL MEASURES ON RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN CRIMINAL CASES
Keywords:
Restorative Justice, MediationAbstract
This research has a purpose. 1) to study the background, meaning, concepts, theories, and legal measures related to the reconciliation of Thai and foreign criminal cases. Court of Appeal Legal measures And related research contributions. 2) To study the problems and legal issues related to the reconciliation of Thai criminal cases. How to fix 3) To study and compare the problems of reconciliation in Thai and foreign criminal cases. How different or different with Thailand? 4) to introduce a legal framework for the establishment of a harmonized international criminal justice system. To apply the law of Thailand to be effective in many countries. This research is a qualitative research by documentary research and questionnaire. By in-depth interview. The sample population is a government agency that oversees the relevant staff. To obtain primary information about this, both theoretical and practical. The basic statistical analysis is based on survey data. The results of the study.
According to studies, it has been found that Thailand has no law requiring other agencies to take part in the deliberations to issue a moratorium on criminal prosecution. Section 44 and Section 46 grant the power to order the prosecution to be the sole public prosecutor. Do not allow the accused. Or the victim Has exercised the right to appeal the order.
The research is Bill of measures to replace criminal cases BE ... should be added other units that exist. To allow the accused, the defendant or the injured person to exercise the right to appeal the order of the prosecutor. To achieve the righteousness of the order. and bring stability to the criminal justice process.
References
กระทรวงยุติธรรม. (2546). กระบวนทัศน์ใหม่ของกระบวนการยุติธรรมในการปฏิบัติต่อผู้กระทำผิด.กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักกิจการยุติธรรม กระทรวงยุติธรรม.
จุฑารัตน์ เอื้ออำนวย. (2547). กระบวยการยุติธรรมเชิงสมานฉันท์ ทางเลือกในการยุติข้อขัดแย้งทางอาญาสำหรับสังคมไทย. กรุงเทพมหานคร: ดุลพห.
สำนักระงับข้อพิพาท สำนักงานศาลยุติธรรม. (2552). การไกล่เกลี่ยฟื้นสัมพันธ์ในคดีอาญา. กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักระงับข้อพิพาท สำนักงานศาลยุติธรรม.
Roche, Declan. (2003). Accountability in Restorative Justice. New York: Oxford University Press
Weitekamp, Elmar G. M. (2000). Research on Victim-Offender Mediation: Findings and Needs for the Future. In Victim-Offender Mediation in Europe: Making Restorative Justice Work pp.99-121. Leuven (Belgium): Leuven University Press.
Wenzel, L. H. (2000). Understanding managerial coaching: The role of manager attributes and skills in effective coaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The articles published are copyrighted by the Sarasas Journal of Humanities and Social Science. The opinions expressed in each article in this academic journal are those of the individual authors and do not reflect the views of Sarasas Suvarnabhumi Institute of Technology. The authors are solely responsible for all aspects of their respective articles. Any errors or inaccuracies in the articles are the sole responsibility of the authors.
