“GOOD” AND “BAD” PEOPLE IN THAI CULTURE: MORAL STRUCTURES AND THE DARK SIDES OF GOODNESS IN CONTEMPORARY THAI SOCIETY

Main Article Content

Taisith Kruasom

Abstract

This article reviews and synthesizes conceptual literature on the “good person–bad person” binary in Thai culture. It proposes that goodness should be understood as a moral structure embedded in everyday life, rather than being seen merely as an individual virtue detached from its social context. Drawing on moral anthropology and everyday ethics, the article explains (1) how meanings of goodness are constructed, (2) how goodness becomes a social norm, and (3) how such a moral framework is used to classify individuals as good or bad in contemporary Thai society. The synthesis shows that goodness does not function only as a moral ideal, but also as a mechanism that produces legitimacy and regulates social relationships through cultural expectations, shared ideals, and repeated practices in everyday life. At the same time, part of the literature reveals the darker side of goodness when it is elevated into a norm that is difficult to question, including moral superiority, moral violence, unintentional harm, and pressure placed on those expected to be good. The article argues that these phenomena do not arise only from individual ill intent, but are also related to a moral structure that treats goodness as the highest standard for judging persons. In this way, the article opens a deeper understanding of morality, conflict, and coexistence in contemporary Thai society.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kruasom, T. (2026). “GOOD” AND “BAD” PEOPLE IN THAI CULTURE: MORAL STRUCTURES AND THE DARK SIDES OF GOODNESS IN CONTEMPORARY THAI SOCIETY. Journal of Yanasangvorn Research Institute Mahamakut Buddhist University, 17(1), 61–72. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/yri/article/view/290377
Section
Academic Article

References

Benjamin, J. (2021). Acknowledgment, harming, and political trauma: Reflections after the plague year. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 18(3), 401–

https://doi.org/10.1080/1551806X.2021.1941637

Berker, S., (2024) “Is There Anti-Fittingness?”, Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy 11: 39. https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.6916

Bykvist, K. (2021). Taking values seriously. Synthese, 199(3–4), 6331–6356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03071-1

Chabada, M. (2021). Moral facts as facts of life. Filosofický časopis, 69(Special Issue 3), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.46854/fc.2021.3s10

Chan, B. (2025). The moral worth of mixed actions. Journal of Ethics, 29(4), 613–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-025-09512-0

Choowattanapakorn, T. (1999). The social situation in Thailand: The impact on elderly people. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 5(2),

–99. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-172X.1999.00155.x

Fingerhut, J., & Prinz, J. J. (2018). Grounding evaluative concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 373(1752), 20170142.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0142

Frank, A. W. (2016). Truth telling, companionship, and witness. Hastings Center Report, 46(3), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.591

Haybron, D. M. (2025). Well-being and the problem of suffering (pp. 184–212). In Well-being and the problem of suffering. Oxford University

Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191955853.003.0011

Häyry, M. (2019). Justice and the possibility of good moralism in bioethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 28(2), 236–263.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180119000082

Heiphetz, L. (2019). Moral essentialism and generosity among children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(12), 2077–

https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000587

Hettiarachchi, S. (2012). Sufficiency and material development: A post-secular reflection in the light of Buddhist thought. European Review,

(1), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798711000354

Jasso, G. (2017). Inequality in the distribution of a good is a bad. European Sociological Review, 33(4), 604–614.

https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcx062

Kaptein, M. (2023). A paradox of ethics: Why people in good organizations do bad things. Journal of Business Ethics, 184(1), 297–316.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05142-w

Kirchin, S. (2017). Thick evaluation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198803430.001.0001

Kupfer, J. (2011). When the badness of vice outweighs the goodness of virtue. Journal of Value Inquiry, 45(4), 433–441.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-011-9305-x

Mendes, J. (2024). A treason against goodness and an argument for death: Re-visiting the trope of the “bad Black mother.” Hypatia, 39(4), 812–

https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2024.34

Ni, P. (2016). Can bad guys have good gongfu? Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 43(1–2), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6253.12226

Norcross, A. (2020). Morality by degrees: Reasons without demands. Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198844990.001.0001

Phaosavasdi, S., Taneepanichskul, S., Tannirandorn, Y., Uerpairojkit, B., Pruksapong, C., Kanjanapitak, A., & Phupong, V. (2006). Morality and

rural knowledge to globalization. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 89(2), 265–266.

Piazza, J., Goodwin, G. P., Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2014). When a virtue is not a virtue. Social Cognition, 32(6), 528–558.

https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.6.528

Rice, S., & Trafimow, D. (2011). It’s a just world no matter which way you look at it. Journal of General Psychology, 138(3), 229–242.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2011.582524

Roy, M., Gandsman, A., & Plante, N. (2024). The polarized “naturalizations” of the 2022 Freedom Convoy. Discover Global Society, 2(1), Article

https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-024-00107-y

Szumowska, E., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2019). A stroll through the garden of “goodness” and “badness.” Psychological Inquiry, 30(3), 151–154.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2019.1646053

Wong, D. B. (2025). Human nature in the ethics of Mengzi and Xunzi (pp. 101–144). In Oxford handbook of Chinese philosophy. Oxford

University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199945498.013.5