The main theories relating to causality between acts and damages in civil liability law within the Civil Law and Common Law countries

Main Article Content

Supakunya Khangrang

Abstract

This article aims to study various theories relating to the relationship between acts and damages in civil liability law. These theories are currently well known in Civil and Common Law countries and are the main theories for the study of law, especially in civil liability law. Therefore, the study of these theories is very useful in academics. In addition to comprehend background knowledge of the theory, this study allows to understand the conceptual system of the Thai law model countries.                                         The theories discussed in this article are as follows: theory of equivalence of conditions, theory of adequate causality, theory of Aquilian relativity, which are used in Romano-Germanic countries, the Civil Law countries. The focus will also be on the most widely used actual causation in tort adjudication within Anglo-Saxon countries such as but-for test theory, proximate cause theory, efficient or direct cause theory. This study is not only for the analytical mechanisms of these theories, but also the utilization for analysis of the Supreme Court judgment.

Article Details

How to Cite
Khangrang, S. . (2023). The main theories relating to causality between acts and damages in civil liability law within the Civil Law and Common Law countries. Journal of Thai Justice System, 16(2), 169–182. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JTJS/article/view/255549
Section
Academic Articles

References

DURRY, G. Rapport introductif. Les distorsions du lien de causalité en droit de la responsabilité (2006). In Acte du colloque des 15 et 16 décembre 2006. Faculté de droit et de science politique de Rennes (Supplément n° 40 p. 5). Coll. Lamy Droit Civil.

DURRY, G. Le lien de causalité : approche comparative. Les distorsions du lien de causalité en droit de la responsabilité (2006). In Acte du colloque des 15 et 16 décembre 2006. Faculté de droit et de science politique de Rennes (Supplément n° 40 p. 7). Coll. Lamy Droit Civil.

QUEZEL-AMBRUNAZ, C. (2010). Essai sur la causalité en droit de la responsabilité civile. Paris : Dalloz.

VINEY, G., JOURDAIN, P., & CARVEL, S. (2013). Les conditions de la responsabilité. Traité de droit civil (4th ed.,). Paris : LGDJ.

MAGNUS, U. (1998). Causation under German Tort Law. In Unification of Tort Law: Wrongfulness (p. 63). Kluwer Law International.

LEGEAIS, R. (2016). Grands systèmes de droit contemporains (Approche comparative). Paris : Litec.

BUFFELAN-LANORE, Y. & LARRIAU-TERNEYRE, V. (2020). Droit civil : Les obligations. Sirey, coll. Sirey Université.

WRIGHT, RICHARD W. (1985) Causation in Tort Law. 73 Cal. L. Rev. 1735, 1828 (1985).

ศนันท์กรณ์ โสตถิพันธุ์. (2564).คำอธิบายกฎหมายลักษณะละเมิด จัดการงานนอกสั่ง ลาภมิควรได้.(พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 10). กรุงเทพฯ : สำนักพิมพ์วิญญูชน