The main theories relating to causality between acts and damages in civil liability law within the Civil Law and Common Law countries
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims to study various theories relating to the relationship between acts and damages in civil liability law. These theories are currently well known in Civil and Common Law countries and are the main theories for the study of law, especially in civil liability law. Therefore, the study of these theories is very useful in academics. In addition to comprehend background knowledge of the theory, this study allows to understand the conceptual system of the Thai law model countries.
The theories discussed in this article are as follows: theory of equivalence of conditions, theory of adequate causality, theory of Aquilian relativity, which are used in Romano-Germanic countries, the Civil Law countries. The focus will also be on the most widely used actual causation in tort adjudication within Anglo-Saxon countries such as but-for test theory, proximate cause theory, efficient or direct cause theory. This study is not only for the analytical mechanisms of these theories, but also the utilization for analysis of the Supreme Court judgment.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Published Manuscripts are the copyright of the Journal of the Justice System. However; the opinions that appeared in the content are the sole responsibility of the author.
References
ศนันท์กรณ์ โสตถิพันธุ์. (2564).คำอธิบายกฎหมายลักษณะละเมิด จัดการงานนอกสั่ง ลาภมิควรได้ (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 10). กรุงเทพฯ: วิญญูชน.
Buffelan-Lanore, Y. & Larriau-Terneyre, V. (2020). Droit civil : Les obligations. Sirey, coll: Sirey Université.
Durry, G. (2006). Le lien de causalité : approche comparative. Les distorsions du lien de causalité en droit de la responsabilité (2006). In Les distorsions du lienet de causalite en droit de la responsabilite : Acte du colloque des 15 et 16 décembre 2006. Faculté de droit et de science politique de Rennes (7.). Coll: Lamy Droit Civil.
Durry, G. (2006). Rapport introductif. Les distorsions du lien de causalité en droit de la responsabilité. In Acte du colloque des 15 et 16 décembre 2006. Faculté de droit et de science politique de Rennes (5.). Coll: Lamy Droit Civil.
Legeais, R. (2016). Grands systèmes de droit contemporains Approche comparative. Paris : Litec.
Magnus, U. (1998). Causation under German Tort Law. In Koziol, H. & Steininger (Ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Wrongfulness (63-65). N.P.: Kluwer Law International.
Quezel-AmbrunaZ, C. (2010). Essai sur la causalité en droit de la responsabilité civile. Paris : Dalloz.
Slim, H. (2006). Le lien de causelice : aproche comparative. In Durry, G. (Ed.), Les distorsions du lien causaline en droin de la responso blite : Aces du colloque des is15 et 16 december 2006 (64-65). Rennes: Universive de Rennes I, Faculte de droit er de science politique.
Wright, R. W. (1985). Causation in Tort Law. 73 California law Review, 73(6), 1735-1828.
Viney, G., Jourdain, P., & Carvel, S. (2013). Les conditions de la responsabilité. (4th ed.,). Paris : LGDJ.