FACTORS AND INDICATORS OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXCELLENCE OF QUALITY EDUCATION OF THE LOCAL ADMINISTRATION WITH THE LOWER NORTHEASTERN REGION

Abstract

The purposes of this research were 1) to study of factors and indicators of administrative excellence of quality education of the local administration with the lower northeastern region and 2) to ensure concurrent validity of those indicators. The factors and indicators were determined after an extensive review of literature and interviews of the educated, the experienced. The research instrument used for collecting data was a five rating scale questionnaire. The IOC was 0.80-1.00 and the level of confidence was 0.93. The sample consisted of 100 the local administration with the lower northeastern region. The data were analyzed by using exploratory factor analysis, principal component analysis, and orthogonal varimax rotation. Then a questionnaire base on the indicators was given to 30 quality education of the local administration with the lower northeastern region in the known group. Data analysis was done by using t-test. The findings of this research were 12 factors and 55 indicators of administrative excellence of quality education of the local administration with the lower northeastern region. The variance of 55 indicators was 63.99 Loading value ranked from the highest to the lowest included 1) Team Work with 10 indicators, the highest variance at 9.33% 2) Focus of student, parent and community with 8 indicators, the variance at 9.11% 3) Strategic Planningwith 7 indicators, the variance at 7.76% 4)Communicate for Effectivenesswith 4 indicators, the variance at 5.68% 5) Participation for Development with 4 indicators, the variance at 5.13% 6) Administration Process with 4 indicators, the variance at 4.73%7) Self Assessment with 3 indicators, the variance at 4.25% 8) Information Technologywith 3 indicators, the variance at 4.12% 9) Result of Operationswith 3 indicators, the variance at 3.91% 10) Leadership with 3 indicators, the variance at 3.62% 11) Administrationfor Changewith 3 indicators, the variance at 3.37% and 12) Commitmentfor Successeswith 3 indicators, the variance at 2.76% The analysis of the indicators to the known groups showed statistical significance. This assure that the 55 indicators were concurrently valid.