TEACHER SUPERVISION PROGRAM TO CONTRIBUTE TEACHER’S LEARNING TO TEACH GLOCAL ENGLISHES

Authors

  • THANANYA VIRIYAPANYANONT BURAPHA UNIVERSITY
  • PUNWALAI KEWARA BURAPHA UNIVERSITY
  • DENCHAI PRABJANDEE BURAPHA UNIVERSITY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/nrru-rdi.2020.8

Keywords:

Teacher professional development, Teacher’s learning, Teacher supervision program, Glocal Englishes

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore effects of a teacher supervision program to enhance teachers’ learning to teach Glocal Englishes. The participants were 2 in-service English teachers from two different high schools from Nakhon Ratchasima Provincial Administration Organization, who were purposefully selected to participate in this study. The research instruments used for data collection were supervision dialogue, classroom observations, and reflection note. Qualitative data were collected and analyzed by the thematic analysis method.

            The results of this study indicated that the data revealed three themes, which were 1) teacher characteristic which included teacher costume, voice of tone and physical expression, 2) techniques in the classroom that refer about the teaching style that transform the English traditional style instead with Glocal Englishes teaching style, provide various medias in the classroom, focus on the students group work project, gave a chance to use the student’s mobile phone to search the data or information from the internet and emphasized more on the student-centered, and 3) the relationship between student and teacher which included the students feeling about the comfortable, joyful and friendly. The Glocal Englishes classroom’s atmosphere can be relax and happier because teachers try to conduct the new thing from the data shown in three themes and the feedbacks from the students were better and they wanted this learning style again. So, three themes were organized after the teachers implemented with teacher supervision program.

References

Abdulla, A. (2008). Educational supervision: a new challenge. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 101(1), 6.

Bates, A. J., Drits, D., & Ramirez, L. A. (2011). Self-awareness and enactment of supervisory stance: Influences on responsiveness toward student teacher learning. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(3), 69-87.

Birman, B., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 24(3), 3.

Blair, P. (2009). Input-Output Analysis Foundations and Extensions. Second Edition : Cambridge University Press.

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.

Borko, H. (2004). Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping to Terrain. SAGE Journal, 33(8), 3-15.

Boyd, D. (2006). G/localization: When global information and local interaction collide. Talk presented at the O’Reilly Emerging Technology Conference, San Diego, CA. Retrieved September 20, 2019, from https://www.danah.org/papers/Etech2006.html

Brown, H. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. White Plains, NY : Longman.

Burns, R. W., & Badiali, B. (2016). Unearthing the complexities of clinical pedagogy in supervision: Identifying the pedagogical skills of supervisors. Action in Teacher Education, 38(2), 156-174.

Clark, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (1994). Reconceptualising teacher change. Challenges in mathematics education: Constraints on construction, 1, 153-164.

_______. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947-957.

Coleman, J. S., & Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., & Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC : U.S. Government Printing Office.

Cross, R., & Gearson, M. (2004). Second Language teacher education: Sociocultural directions for the future. Paper presented at Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education. Melbourne, Australia.

Crystal, D. (2011). English as a Global language. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education policy analysis archives, 8, 1.

Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B., & Thorenson, A. (2001). Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 57-77.

Darling-Hammond, L., Chung, R., & Frelow, F. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach? Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 286-302.

Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2001). What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers. American educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-925.

Elmore, R. F., & Burney, D. (1997). School Variation and Systemic Instructional Improvement in Community School District# 2, New York City. High Performance Learning Communities Project.

Espitia Carrascal, R. E., & Montes Rotela, M. (2009). INFLUENCIA DE LA FAMILIA EN EL PROCESO EDUCATIVO DE LOS MENORES DEL BARRIO COSTA AZUL DE SINCELEJO (COLOMBIA). Investigación y desarrollo, 17(1).

Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2013). Using listening journals to raise awareness of Global Englishes in ELT. ELT Journal, 68(4), 386-396.

Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What Makes Professional Development Effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American educational Research Journal. 38(4), 915-945.

Gebhard, J. (1990). Freeing the Teacher: A Supervisory Process. Foreign Language Annuals, 23, 517-525.

Globalization & Education Research Starters. (2017). Technological Revolution. Retrieved September 22, 2019, from https://www.enotes.com/research-starters/globalization-education #research-starter-research-starter>

Golombek, R., & Johnson, E. (2003). “Seeing” Teacher Learning. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 729-737.

González-Pienda, J. A (2003). El rendimiento escolar. Un análisis de la variables que lo condicionan. Revista Galego-Portuguesa de Psicoloxía e Educación, 7(9), 247-258.

Jenkins, J. (2015). Global Englishes. New York : Routledge.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2015). Developing Young Learners’ Local Culture Awareness and Global English: Integrated Instruction. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(9), 677-681.

Khondker, H. H. (2004). Glocalization as globalization: Evolution of a sociological concept. Bangladesh eJournal of Sociology, 1(2). Retrieved September 22, 2019, from https:// muktomona.net/Articles/habibul_haque/Globalization.pdf

Kim, T.-Y., Kim, Y.-K., & Zhang, Q.-M. (2014). Differences in demotivation between Chinese and Korean English teachers: A mixed-methods study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23, 299-310.

Kitgaard, R. H., & Hall, G. R. (1974). Are there unusually effective schools? Journal of Human Resources, 10(3), 40-106.

Kossek, E., & Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. (2011). Workplace social support and work-family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work-family-specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel psychology, 64, 289-313.

Lee, S. Y., & Gallagher, D. (2008). Assessment methods in human body composition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care, 11, 566-572.

Luk-Fong, P. (2005). A search for new ways of describing parent-child relationships voices from principals, teachers, guidance professionals, parents and pupils. Childhood-a Global Journal of Child Research-CHILDHOOD, 12, 111-137.

Lynch, H. & Patel, F. (2013). Glocalization as an Alternative to Internationalization in Higher Education: Embedding Positive Glocal Learning Perspectives. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 25(2), 223-230.

Moradi, K., & Sepehrifar, S., & Khadiv, T. (2014). Exploring Iranian EFL teachers’ perceptions on supervision. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1214-1223.

Murnane, R. J., & Philips, B. R. (1981). Learning by doing, vintage and selection: Three pieces of the puzzle relating teaching experience and teaching performance. Economics of Education Review, 11(4), 691-693.

Office of Education Council. (2015). The National Plan in 2017-2026. Retrieved Mar 17, 2017, from https://www.onec.go.th/index.php/outstand/2532. (In Thai)

Penuel, W., Fisherman, J. B., Gallagher, P. L., Yamaguchi, R. (2007). What Makes Professional Development Effective? Strategies That Foster Curriculum Implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921-958.

Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Fuel and Energy Abstracts, 36, 257-267.

Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2000). Variable definitions, data, and programs for teachers, students, and academic achievement, Econometrica Supplementary Material, 73, 2.

Schaeffer, H. R. (2003). Social interaction and the beginnings of communication. In A.Slater & G.Bremner (eds.), An Introduction to Developmental Psychology. Oxford : Blackwell.

Schon, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London : Temple Smith.

Simmie, G. (2007). Teacher Design Teams (TDTs)-building capacity for innovation, learning and curriculum implementation in the continuing professional development of in-career teachers. Irish Educational Studies, 26(2), 163-176.

Smyth, J., & Henry, C. (1985). Case Study Experience of a Collaborative and Responsible Form of Professional Development for Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 10(1), 1.

Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning environments research, 15(2), 171-193.

Tesema, A. (2014). The practices and challenges of school-based supervision in government secondary schools of Kamashi Zone of Benishangul Gumuz Regional State. Dissertation for Doctoral of Educational Planning and Management, Jimma University, Ethiopia.

The Glossary of Education Reform. (2013). Professional Development. Retrieved Mar 18, 2017, from https://www.edglossary.org/professional-development.

Tong, H. K., & Cheung, L. H. (2011). Cultural identity and languages: a proposed framework for cultural globalization and glocalisation. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 32(1), 55-69.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. (A. Kozulin ed.). Cambridge MA : The MIT Press.

Williams, M. & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for Language Teachers: A Social Constructivist Approach. Emst Klett Sprachen.

Yang, R., & Qiu, F. (2010). Globalisation and Chinese knowledge diaspora: An Australian case study. The Australian Educational Researcher, 37(3), 19-37.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-01

How to Cite

VIRIYAPANYANONT, T., KEWARA, P. ., & PRABJANDEE, D. (2020). TEACHER SUPERVISION PROGRAM TO CONTRIBUTE TEACHER’S LEARNING TO TEACH GLOCAL ENGLISHES. Research Community and Social Development Journal, 14(1), 79–109. https://doi.org/10.14456/nrru-rdi.2020.8

Issue

Section

Research Articles